Tracking the emergence of synthetic biology
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] D. Endy,et al. Refinement and standardization of synthetic biological parts and devices , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.
[2] Alan L. Porter,et al. How to combine term clumping and technology roadmapping for newly emerging science & technology competitive intelligence: “problem & solution” pattern based semantic TRIZ tool and case study , 2014, Scientometrics.
[3] Rainer Breitling,et al. Synthetic biology advances for pharmaceutical production , 2015, Current opinion in biotechnology.
[4] Ismael Rafols,et al. Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time , 2009, Scientometrics.
[5] Timo Minssen,et al. Standardization, IPRs and open innovation in synthetic biology , 2014 .
[6] Ralf Jungmann,et al. From DNA nanotechnology to synthetic biology , 2008, HFSP journal.
[7] Thomas Reiss,et al. The development of synthetic biology: a patent analysis , 2013, Systems and Synthetic Biology.
[8] Ludo Waltman,et al. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping , 2009, Scientometrics.
[9] Pablo Carbonell,et al. Mapping the patent landscape of synthetic biology for fine chemical production pathways , 2016, Microbial biotechnology.
[10] Martin Fussenegger,et al. Emerging biomedical applications of synthetic biology , 2011, Nature Reviews Genetics.
[11] Martina Merz,et al. The local configuration of new research fields : on regional and national diversity , 2016 .
[12] Ronald Rousseau,et al. From a word to a world: the current situation in the interdisciplinary field of synthetic biology , 2015, PeerJ.
[13] H. Small,et al. Identifying emerging topics in science and technology , 2014 .
[14] Eugene Garfield,et al. THE SIGNIFICANT SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE APPEARS IN A SMALL CORE OF JOURNALS , 1996 .
[15] Magnus Hagevi,et al. Follow the money: Public subsidies and the changing intra-party balance of power between different faces of the party organisation—the case of Sweden , 2018 .
[16] Matthew E Falagas,et al. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses , 2007, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.
[17] Peter van den Besselaar,et al. Mapping science through bibliometric triangulation: An experimental approach applied to water research , 2017, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[18] Andrei Mogoutov,et al. Data search strategy for science and technology emergence: A scalable and evolutionary query for nanotechnology tracking , 2007 .
[19] Loet Leydesdorff,et al. Aggregated journal–journal citation relations in scopus and web of science matched and compared in terms of networks, maps, and interactive overlays , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[20] Alan L. Porter,et al. Capturing new developments in an emerging technology: an updated search strategy for identifying nanotechnology research outputs , 2013, Scientometrics.
[21] F. Lienert,et al. Synthetic biology in mammalian cells: next generation research tools and therapeutics , 2014, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.
[22] Philip Shapira,et al. Synthetic biology in China: An update from the field , 2015 .
[23] Kevin W. Boyack,et al. Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature , 2011, J. Informetrics.
[24] J. Keasling. Synthetic biology and the development of tools for metabolic engineering. , 2012, Metabolic engineering.
[25] Aliya Kuzhabekova,et al. Mapping the emerging field of genome editing , 2014, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..
[26] Li Tang,et al. Funding acknowledgment analysis: Queries and caveats , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[27] Margret Engelhard. Synthetic Biology Analysed : Tools for Discussion and Evaluation , 2016 .
[28] C PhilpJames,et al. Emerging Policy Issues in Synthetic Biology , 2014 .
[29] Karen M Polizzi. What is synthetic biology? , 2013, Methods in molecular biology.
[30] Wolfgang Glänzel. Bibliometrics-aided retrieval: where information retrieval meets scientometrics , 2014, Scientometrics.
[31] Jane Calvert,et al. A Synthetic Biology Roadmap for the UK , 2012 .
[32] Christina D Smolke,et al. Building outside of the box: iGEM and the BioBricks Foundation , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.
[33] Jane Calvert,et al. Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “The Study of Socioethical Issues in Systems Biology” , 2007, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.
[34] Markus Schmidt,et al. Synthetic biology: An emerging research field in China , 2011, Biotechnology advances.
[35] D. Aksnes. CHARACTERISTICS OF HIGHLY CITED PAPERS , 2003 .
[36] Raymond A Zilinskas,et al. The promise and perils of synthetic biology. , 2006, New Atlantis.
[37] D. Stemerding,et al. Discourses on synthetic biology in Europe , 2013 .
[38] Can Huang,et al. Nanoscience and technology publications and patents: a review of social science studies and search strategies , 2011 .
[39] L.J. Clarke,et al. Synthetic biology in the UK – An outline of plans and progress , 2016, Synthetic and systems biotechnology.
[40] J. Collins,et al. A brief history of synthetic biology , 2014, Nature Reviews Microbiology.
[41] George M. Church,et al. Regenesis: How Synthetic Biology Will Reinvent Nature and Ourselves , 2012 .
[42] P. Waila,et al. Sentiment analysis of movie reviews: A new feature-based heuristic for aspect-level sentiment classification , 2013, 2013 International Mutli-Conference on Automation, Computing, Communication, Control and Compressed Sensing (iMac4s).
[43] D. W. Sharp. CITATION DATA IDENTIFY COLON CANCER, MENTAL HEALTH AS HOT RESEARCH AREAS , 1996 .
[44] Christopher Moraes,et al. Next generation tools to accelerate the synthetic biology process. , 2016, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.
[45] Philip Shapira,et al. UK Synthetic Biology Centres tasked with addressing public concerns , 2015 .
[46] Paula E. Stephan. How Economics Shapes Science , 2012 .
[47] Kristin Hagen,et al. Science Policy and Concomitant Research in Synthetic Biology—Some Critical Thoughts , 2016 .
[48] Rainer Breitling,et al. Judging synthetic biology risks , 2015, Science.
[49] Morgan Meyer,et al. Assembling, Governing, and Debating an Emerging Science: The Rise of Synthetic Biology in France , 2013 .
[50] Eric M. Ramirez-Weaver,et al. A saving science , 2017 .
[51] Jan L. Youtie,et al. Is there a clubbing effect underlying Chinese research citation Increases? , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[52] Alan L. Porter,et al. Science overlay maps: A new tool for research policy and library management , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[53] Le Feuvre RA,et al. SYNBIOCHEM Synthetic Biology Research Centre, Manchester – A UK foundry for fine and speciality chemicals production , 2016, Synthetic and systems biotechnology.
[54] Philip Shapira,et al. Funding acknowledgement analysis: an enhanced tool to investigate research sponsorship impacts: the case of nanotechnology , 2011, Scientometrics.
[55] Helen Pearson. NEWS FEATURE 眠ってやせる , 2006 .
[56] Jonathan Adams,et al. China's absorptive State: research, innovation and the prospects for China-UK collaboration , 2013 .
[57] Erin A. Cech,et al. How Economics Shapes Science , 2013 .
[58] Markus Schmidt,et al. Synthetic biology in the view of European public funding organisations , 2012, Public understanding of science.
[59] Luis Campos,et al. That Was the Synthetic Biology That Was , 2009 .
[60] Jane Calvert,et al. The Commodification of Emergence: Systems Biology, Synthetic Biology and Intellectual Property , 2008 .
[61] Shouhuai Xu,et al. Spatiotemporal Patterns and Predictability of Cyberattacks , 2015, PloS one.
[62] Amal Zouaq,et al. An Assessment of Online Semantic Annotators for the Keyword Extraction Task , 2014, PRICAI.
[63] Daniele Rotolo,et al. Emerging Technology , 2001 .
[64] Antonio Perianes-Rodríguez,et al. Differences in citation impact across countries , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[65] Huimin Zhao,et al. A brief overview of synthetic biology research programs and roadmap studies in the United States , 2016, Synthetic and systems biotechnology.
[66] Alan L. Porter,et al. A systematic method to create search strategies for emerging technologies based on the Web of Science: illustrated for ‘Big Data’ , 2015, Scientometrics.
[67] Alan L. Porter,et al. Emerging technologies: quantitative identification and measurement , 2010, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..
[68] Yingying Zhou,et al. The rapid rise of a research nation , 2015, Nature.
[69] Philip Shapira,et al. Is There a Relationship between Research Sponsorship and Publication Impact? An Analysis of Funding Acknowledgments in Nanotechnology Papers , 2015, PloS one.
[70] Henk F. Moed,et al. Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems , 2004 .
[71] J. Stilgoe,et al. Mapping the landscape of climate engineering , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.
[72] Division on Earth,et al. Positioning Synthetic Biology to Meet the Challenges of the 21st Century , 2013 .
[73] Jan Youtie,et al. Social science contributions compared in synthetic biology and nanotechnology , 2015 .
[74] Christopher A. Voigt,et al. Realizing the potential of synthetic biology , 2014, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.
[75] Jean-Philippe Cointet,et al. Mapping the Emergence of Synthetic Biology , 2016, PloS one.
[76] Tiago Moreira,et al. Structures of Scientific Collaboration , 2009 .
[77] Bernadette Bensaude Vincent,et al. Discipline-building in synthetic biology. , 2013, Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences.
[78] Loet Leydesdorff,et al. Nanotechnology as a field of science: Its delineation in terms of journals and patents , 2007, Scientometrics.
[79] Loet Leydesdorff,et al. International Collaboration in Science: The Global Map and the Network , 2013, ArXiv.
[80] Fang Han,et al. Identifying emerging topics in a technological domain , 2016, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..
[81] T. Lu,et al. Synthetic biology: an emerging engineering discipline. , 2012, Annual review of biomedical engineering.
[82] P. Oldham,et al. Synthetic Biology: Mapping the Scientific Landscape , 2012, PloS one.
[83] C. Mao,et al. DNA nanotechnology. , 2004, BioTechniques.
[84] Margret Engelhard,et al. Synthetic Biology Analysed , 2016 .
[85] Synthetic biology in China, UK and US , 2016, Synthetic and systems biotechnology.
[86] L. Aharonson-Daniel,et al. Twitter in the Cross Fire—The Use of Social Media in the Westgate Mall Terror Attack in Kenya , 2014, PloS one.
[87] Michel Zitt,et al. Delineating complex scientific fields by an hybrid lexical-citation method: An application to nanosciences , 2006, Inf. Process. Manag..
[88] Dirk Stemerding,et al. Governing synthetic biology for global health through responsible research and innovation , 2013, Systems and Synthetic Biology.
[89] Ismael Rafols,et al. Visualization of Disciplinary Profiles: Enhanced Science Overlay Maps , 2017, J. Data Inf. Sci..
[90] John P. A. Ioannidis,et al. Concentration of the Most-Cited Papers in the Scientific Literature: Analysis of Journal Ecosystems , 2006, PloS one.
[91] J. Youtie,et al. Refining search terms for nanotechnology , 2008 .
[92] Philip Handler. Biology and the Future of Man , 1970 .
[93] P. K. Ajikumar,et al. The future of metabolic engineering and synthetic biology: towards a systematic practice. , 2012, Metabolic engineering.
[94] Richard J. R. Kelwick,et al. Promoting microbiology education through the iGEM synthetic biology competition. , 2015, FEMS microbiology letters.
[95] Fujia Li,et al. Framing responsible innovation in synthetic biology: the need for a critical discourse analysis approach , 2015 .
[96] Drew Endy,et al. Engineering BioBrick vectors from BioBrick parts , 2008, Journal of Biological Engineering.
[97] Yougen Li,et al. Beyond Protein Engineering: its Applications in Synthetic Biology , 2012 .
[98] David H. Guston,et al. Responsible innovation: who could be against that? , 2015 .