Active Subspace Development of Integrally Bladed Disk Dynamic Properties Due to Manufacturing Variations

The impact of geometry variations on integrally bladed disk eigenvalues is investigated. A large population of industrial bladed disks (blisks) are scanned via a structured light optical scanner to provide as-measured geometries in the form of point-cloud data. The point cloud data are transformed using principal component (PC) analysis that results in a Pareto of PCs. The PCs are used as inputs to predict the variation in a blisk's eigenvalues due to geometry variations from nominal when all blades have the same deviations. A large subset of the PCs is retained to represent the geometry variation, which proves challenging in probabilistic analyses because of the curse of dimensionality. To overcome this, the dimensionality of the problem is reduced by computing an active subspace that describes critical directions in the PC input space. Active variables in this subspace are then fit with a surrogate model of a blisk's eigenvalues. This surrogate can be sampled efficiently with the large subset of PCs retained in the active subspace formulation to yield a predicted distribution in eigenvalues. The ability of building an active subspace mapping PC coefficient to eigenvalues is demonstrated. Results indicate that exploitation of the active subspace is capable of capturing eigenvalue variation.

[1]  Joseph A. Beck,et al.  The Effect of Manufacturing Variations on Unsteady Interaction in a Transonic Turbine , 2017 .

[2]  D. Gleich,et al.  Computing active subspaces with Monte Carlo , 2014, 1408.0545.

[3]  Christian Saumweber,et al.  Effect of Geometry Variations on the Cooling Performance of Fan-Shaped Cooling Holes , 2012 .

[4]  Joseph A. Beck,et al.  Probabilistic Mistuning Assessment Using Nominal and Geometry Based Mistuning Methods , 2013 .

[5]  Matthias Voigt,et al.  Principal component analysis on 3D scanned compressor blades for probabilistic CFD simulation , 2012 .

[6]  Martin N. Goodhand,et al.  The Impact of Geometric Variation on Compressor Two-Dimensional Incidence Range , 2015 .

[7]  Juan J. Alonso,et al.  Active Subspaces for Shape Optimization , 2014 .

[8]  Gianluca Iaccarino,et al.  Developing Design Insight Through Active Subspaces , 2017 .

[9]  Ramana V. Grandhi,et al.  Probabilistic Analysis of Geometric Uncertainty Effects on Blade Modal Response , 2003 .

[10]  Prashant Kulkarni,et al.  SENSITIVITY-BASED APPROACH TO QUANTIFYING UNCERTAINTY IN AIRFOIL MODAL RESPONSE , 2008 .

[11]  Geoffrey T. Parks,et al.  Turbomachinery Active Subspace Performance Maps , 2017 .

[12]  S. Schreiber,et al.  Highly Accurate Automated 3D Measuring and Data Conditioning for Turbine and Compressor Blades , 2009 .

[13]  Joseph A. Beck,et al.  Uncertainties of an Automated Optical 3D Geometry Measurement, Modeling, and Analysis Process for Mistuned Integrally Bladed Rotor Reverse Engineering , 2013 .

[14]  K. Bammert,et al.  Influences of Manufacturing Tolerances and Surface Roughness of Blades on the Performance of Turbines , 1976 .

[15]  Joseph A. Beck,et al.  Automated Finite Element Model Mesh Updating Scheme Applicable to Mistuning Analysis , 2014 .

[16]  Thomas Schmidt,et al.  Distributed Multidisciplinary Optimization of a Turbine Blade Regarding Performance, Reliability and Castability , 2016 .

[17]  Qiqi Wang,et al.  The Implications of Tolerance Optimization on Compressor Blade Design , 2014, 1411.0338.

[18]  Ronald Scott Bunker,et al.  The Effects of Manufacturing Tolerances on Gas Turbine Cooling , 2009 .

[19]  Joseph A. Beck,et al.  Experimental Validation of a Mesh Quality Optimized Morphed Geometric Mistuning Model , 2015 .

[20]  Sonny Andersson A study of tolerance impact on performance of a supersonic turbine , 2007 .

[21]  David L. Darmofal,et al.  Impact of Geometric Variability on Axial Compressor Performance , 2003 .

[22]  Robert J. Miller,et al.  The Impact of Real Geometries on Three-Dimensional Separations in Compressors , 2010 .

[23]  Alex A. Kaszynski,et al.  Modal Expansion Method for Eigensensitivity Calculations of Cyclically Symmetric Bladed Disks , 2018, AIAA Journal.

[24]  Jeffrey M. Brown,et al.  Accurate Blade Tip Timing Limits Through Geometry Mistuning Modeling , 2015 .

[25]  Alexander Lange,et al.  Impact of Manufacturing Variability on Multistage High-Pressure Compressor Performance , 2012 .

[26]  Rainer Schnell,et al.  On the Impact of Geometric Variability on Fan Aerodynamic Performance, Unsteady Blade Row Interaction, and Its Mechanical Characteristics , 2014 .

[27]  B. Iooss,et al.  A Review on Global Sensitivity Analysis Methods , 2014, 1404.2405.

[28]  Qiqi Wang,et al.  Erratum: Active Subspace Methods in Theory and Practice: Applications to Kriging Surfaces , 2013, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[29]  Matthias Voigt,et al.  Impact of Manufacturing Variability and Nonaxisymmetry on High-Pressure Compressor Stage Performance , 2012 .

[30]  D. Gleich,et al.  Computing Active Subspaces , 2014 .

[31]  Bogdan Marcu,et al.  Prediction of Unsteady Loads and Analysis of Flow Changes due to Turbine Blade Manufacturing Variations during the Development of Turbines for the MB-XX Advanced Upper Stage Engine , 2002 .