On the Relation between Visual Spatial Attention and Visual Field Asymmetries

In the typical visual laterality experiment, words and letters are more rapidly and accurately identified in the right visual field than in the left. However, while such studies usually control fixation, the deployment of visual attention is rarely restricted. The present studies investigated the influence of visual attention on the visual field asymmetries normally observed in single-letter identification and lexical decision tasks. Attention was controlled using a peripheral cue that provided advance knowledge of the location of the forthcoming stimulus. The time period between the onset of the cue and the onset of the stimulus (Stimulus Onset Asynchrony—SOA) was varied, such that the time available for attention to focus upon the location was controlled. At short SO As a right visual field advantage for identifying single letters and for making lexical decisions was apparent. However, at longer SOAs letters and words presented in the two visual fields were identified equally well. It is concluded that visual field advantages arise from an interaction of attentional and structural factors and that the attentional component in visual field asymmetries must be controlled in order to approximate more closely a true assessment of the relative functional capabilities of the right and left cerebral hemispheres.

[1]  E. Yund,et al.  Detectability gradients as a function of target location , 1990, Brain and Cognition.

[2]  David B. Boles,et al.  Hemispheric Interaction in Visual Field Asymmetry , 1983, Cortex.

[3]  W. Heron,et al.  Perception as a function of retinal locus and attention. , 1957, The American journal of psychology.

[4]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Can lateral asymmetries in attention explain interfield differences in visual perception? , 1974, Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior.

[5]  R. Remington,et al.  Moving attention: Evidence for time-invariant shifts of visual selective attention , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  M. Bryden,et al.  Right visual field superiority for letter recognition with partial report. , 1976, Canadian journal of psychology.

[7]  Madeleine M. Gross Hemispheric specialization for processing of visually presented verbal and spatial stimuli , 1972 .

[8]  A. V. D. Heijden,et al.  Single-letter recognition accuracy benefits from advance cuing of location , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  J. Findlay,et al.  Sensitivity and criterion effects in the spatial cuing of visual attention , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Word recognition as a function of retinal locus. , 1952, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  G. Shulman,et al.  Moving attention through visual space. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  Mieke Verfaellie,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetries in mediating intention, but not selective attention , 1988, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  D. Boles What bilateral displays do , 1990, Brain and Cognition.

[14]  E. Yund,et al.  Target detection in one visual field in the presence or absence of stimuli in the contralateral field by right-and left-handed subjects , 1990, Brain and Cognition.

[15]  L. Boer,et al.  Eye movements and stages of processing. , 1988, Acta psychologica.

[16]  P. Satz,et al.  Cross-modal asymmetries in perception related to asymmetry in cerebral function. , 1974, Neuropsychologia.

[17]  A. V. D. van der Heijden Probability matching in visual selective attention. , 1989, Canadian journal of psychology.

[18]  S. Yantis,et al.  Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  A. Lambert,et al.  Selective Attention, Visual Laterality, Awareness, and Perceiving the Meaning of Parafoveally Presented Words , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[20]  M. Bryden,et al.  Locus of information in words and the right visual field effect , 1990, Brain and Cognition.

[21]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[22]  M. Bryden,et al.  Attentional factors in visual field asymmetries. , 1991, Canadian journal of psychology.

[23]  E. Yund,et al.  Detectability as a function of spatial location: Effects of selective attention , 1990, Brain and Cognition.

[24]  James C. Johnston,et al.  Reading and the mental lexicon: on the uptake of visual information , 1989 .

[25]  Jordan Grafman,et al.  Handbook of Neuropsychology , 1991 .

[26]  R Sekuler,et al.  Models of stimulus uncertainty in motion perception. , 1980, Psychological review.

[27]  J. Beaumont Divided visual field studies of cerebral organisation , 1982 .

[28]  E. Yund,et al.  Detectability as a function of target location: Effects of spatial configuration , 1990, Brain and Cognition.

[29]  L. Bérubé,et al.  [Clinical neuropsychology]. , 1982, Nursing Quebec.

[30]  E. Yund,et al.  Scanning the visual field without eye movements—A sex difference , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Comparing the cerebral hemispheres on the speed of spatial shifts of visual attention: Evidence from serial search , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  W. McKeever,et al.  Unilateral versus bilateral presentation methods in the reaction time paradigm , 1984, Brain and Cognition.

[34]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Lexical Representation and Process , 1991 .

[35]  J. Liederman Determinants of the Enhancement of the Right Visual Field Advantage by Bilateral vs. Unilateral Stimuli , 1986, Cortex.

[36]  D. Hines Recognition of verbs, abstract nouns and concrete nouns from the left and right visual half-fields , 1976, Neuropsychologia.

[37]  R Klein,et al.  Covert visual orienting: hemifield-activation can be mimicked by zoom lens and midlocation placement strategies. , 1989, Acta psychologica.

[38]  A. Benton Laterality: Functional Asymmetry in the Intact Brain. , 1984 .

[39]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Allocation of attention in the visual field. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  S. Yantis On analog movements of visual attention , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[41]  J. Jonides Towards a model of the mind's eye's movement. , 1980, Canadian journal of psychology.

[42]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[43]  Visual detectability gradients: The effect of distractors in contralateral field , 1990, Brain and Cognition.

[44]  C. Chiarello,et al.  Lateral eyes or lateralized?: Hemiretinal and ocular dominance effects on visual field asymmetries for the lexical decision task , 1988, Brain and Cognition.

[45]  G. V. Simpson,et al.  Orienting attention within visual fields: how efficient is interhemispheric transfer? , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[46]  D. LaBerge Spatial extent of attention to letters and words. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[47]  M. Kinsbourne The cerebral basis of lateral asymmetries in attention. , 1970, Acta psychologica.

[48]  E. Yund,et al.  Serial processing of visual spatial patterns in a search paradigm , 1990, Brain and Cognition.

[49]  J L Bradshaw,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetry: verbal and spatial encoding of visual stimuli. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[50]  Y. Tsal Movements of attention across the visual field. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[51]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[52]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[53]  M. White Does Cerebral Dominance Offer a Sufficient Explanation for Laterality Differences in Tachistoscopic Recognition? , 1973, Perceptual and motor skills.

[54]  G. Leventhal,et al.  Cerebral Dominance and Attentional Bias in Word Recognition , 1988, Perceptual and motor skills.