Threshold Effects of Coastal Urbanization on Phragmites australis (Common Reed) Abundance and Foliar Nitrogen

The invasion of North American tidal marshes by Phragmites anstralis, or common reed, is a large-scale ecological problem that has been primarily studied at small spatial scales. Previous local-scale studies have provided evidence that the expansion of Phragmites is facilitated by disturbance and increased nitrogen (N) associated with agricultural and urban-suburban (developed) land uses along wetland-upland borders. We tested the generality of previous findings across a larger spatial scale and wider range of environmental conditions in Chesapeake Bay, the largest estuarine ecosystem in the USA. We sampled 90 tidal wetlands nested within 30 distinct subestuarine watersheds and examined the relationship between land use and Phragrnites abundance and foliar N, an indicator of nitrogen availability. We estimated land use adjacent to wetland borders and within subestuary watersheds and explored the importance of spatial proximity by weighting land use by its distance from the wetland border or subestuary shoreline, respectively. Regression tree and changepoint analyses revealed that Phragmites abundance sharply increased in almost every wetland where development adjacent to borders exceeded 15%. Where development was 14-22% shoreline development, the same level of development that corresponded to high levels of invasion. Our results suggest that development near wetlands is at least partially responsible for patterns of invasion across Chesapeake Bay. Larger-scale phenomena, such as nitrogen pollution at the watershed-subest uary scale, also may be facilitating invasion. Urbanization near coastlines appears to play an important role in the invasion success of Phragmites in coastal wetlands of Chesapeake Bay and probably much of eastern North America.

[1]  J. Beaman,et al.  Watershed land use is strongly linked to PCBs in white perch in Chesapeake Bay subestuaries. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  Zhi-jun Liu,et al.  Effects of land-use change on nutrient discharges from the Patuxent River watershed , 2003 .

[3]  Donald E. Weller,et al.  Relating nutrient discharges from watersheds to land use and streamflow variability , 1997 .

[4]  M. Bertness,et al.  Anthropogenic modification of New England salt marsh landscapes , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Joan G. Ehrenfeld,et al.  NET IMPACT OF A PLANT INVASION ON NITROGEN-CYCLING PROCESSES WITHIN A BRACKISH TIDAL MARSH , 2003 .

[6]  L. Meyerson,et al.  Effects of common reed (Phragmites australis) expansions on nitrogen dynamics of tidal marshes of the northeastern U.S. , 2003 .

[7]  Curtis J. Richardson,et al.  Integrating Bioassessment and Ecological Risk Assessment: An Approach to Developing Numerical Water-Quality Criteria , 2003, Environmental management.

[8]  G. De’ath,et al.  CLASSIFICATION AND REGRESSION TREES: A POWERFUL YET SIMPLE TECHNIQUE FOR ECOLOGICAL DATA ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[9]  D. Weller,et al.  Sources of nutrient inputs to the Patuxent River estuary , 2003 .

[10]  M. Bertness,et al.  DISTURBANCE-MEDIATED COMPETITION AND THE SPREAD OF PHRAGMITES AUSTRALIS IN A COASTAL MARSH , 2003 .

[11]  K. Saltonstall,et al.  A comparison of Phragmites australisin freshwater and brackish marsh environments in North America , 2000, Wetlands Ecology and Management.

[12]  Donald E. Weller,et al.  SPATIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR LINKING WATERSHED LAND COVER TO ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS IN STREAMS , 2005 .

[13]  R. Field,et al.  Phragmites australis expansion in Delaware Bay salt marshes , 2005 .

[14]  R. King,et al.  Regional, watershed and local correlates of blue crab and bivalve abundances in subestuaries of Chesapeake Bay, USA , 2005 .

[15]  John F. Paul,et al.  Relationships between watershed Stressors and sediment contamination in Chesapeake Bay estuaries , 1996, Landscape Ecology.

[16]  K. Saltonstall,et al.  EXPANSION OF PHRAGMITES AUSTRALIS INTO TIDAL WETLANDS OF NORTH AMERICA , 1999 .

[17]  Dean L. Urban,et al.  Spatial Dependency of Vegetation–Environment Linkages in an Anthropogenically Influenced Wetland Ecosystem , 2004, Ecosystems.

[18]  David Bart,et al.  The role of large rhizome dispersal and low salinity windows in the establishment of common reed,Phragmites australis, in salt marshes: New links to human activities , 2003 .

[19]  K. Saltonstall,et al.  Cryptic invasion by a non-native genotype of the common reed, Phragmites australis, into North America , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  D. Burdick,et al.  Determinants of expansion forPhragmites australis, common reed, in natural and impacted coastal marshes , 2003 .

[21]  M. Weinstein,et al.  Does the common reed,Phragmites australis, affect essential fish habitat? , 1999 .

[22]  Edward P. Glenn,et al.  Salt tolerance underlies the cryptic invasion of North American salt marshes by an introduced haplotype of the common reed Phragmites australis (Poaceae) , 2005 .

[23]  J. Stevenson,et al.  Colonization and expansion of Phragmites australis in upper Chesapeake Bay tidal marshes , 2000, Wetlands.

[24]  D F Boesch,et al.  Chesapeake Bay eutrophication: scientific understanding, ecosystem restoration, and challenges for agriculture. , 2001, Journal of environmental quality.

[25]  R. C. Anderson,et al.  Effects of nitrogen addition on the invasive grass Phragmites australis and a native competitor Spartina pectinata , 2004 .

[26]  R. Askins,et al.  Impact of the spread ofPhragmites on the distribution of birds in Connecticut tidal marshes , 1999, Wetlands.

[27]  Jan Lepš,et al.  How reliable are our vegetation analyses , 1992 .

[28]  Mark D. Bertness,et al.  Mechanisms of exclusion of native coastal marsh plants by an invasive grass , 2006 .

[29]  David M. Burdick,et al.  Variation in soil salinity associated with expansion of Phragmites australis in salt marshes , 2001 .

[30]  J. L. Gallagher,et al.  The effects of salinity and flooding on Phragmites australis , 1992 .

[31]  J. Timothy Wootton,et al.  Local interactions predict large-scale pattern in empirically derived cellular automata , 2001, Nature.

[32]  Richard C. Lathrop,et al.  Phosphorus Loads to Surface Waters: A Simple Model to Account for Spatial Pattern of Land Use , 1996 .

[33]  C. Hershner,et al.  Influence of land use on macrobenthic communities in nearshore estuarine habitats , 2006 .

[34]  Colin E. Studds,et al.  Influence of land use on the integrity of marsh bird communities of Chesapeake Bay, USA , 2004, Wetlands.

[35]  John F. Paul,et al.  Watershed landscape indicators of estuarine benthic condition , 2004 .

[36]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Classification and Regression Trees , 1984 .

[37]  S. Carpenter Eutrophication of aquatic ecosystems: bistability and soil phosphorus. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  M. Bertness,et al.  CLONAL INTEGRATION AND THE EXPANSION OF PHRAGMITES AUSTRALIS , 2000 .

[39]  J. Weis,et al.  Patterns of metal accumulation in leaves of the tidal marsh plants Spartina alterniflora Loisel and Phragmites australis Cav. Trin ex Steud. Over the growing season , 2003, Wetlands.

[40]  R. Muradian Ecological thresholds: a survey , 2001 .

[41]  Song S. Qian,et al.  Two statistical methods for the detection of environmental thresholds , 2003 .

[42]  W. Reay,et al.  Sources of nitrogen to estuaries in the United States , 2003 .

[43]  Mark D. Bertness,et al.  Shoreline Development Drives Invasion of Phragmites australis and the Loss of Plant Diversity on New England Salt Marshes , 2004 .

[44]  A. Huggett The concept and utility of ecological thresholds in biodiversity conservation , 2005 .