Morphological processing: A comparison between free and bound stem facilitation

Linguists distinguish between words formed from free stems (e.g., actor: act) and those formed from bound stems (e.g., spectator: spect). In a forward masked priming task, we observed significant morphological facilitation for prime-target pairs that shared either a free (e.g., deform-CONFORM) or a bound (e.g., revive-SURVIVE) stem. Relative to an unrelated baseline, magnitudes of facilitation for free (e.g., form) and bound (e.g., vive) stems were significant and comparable, but relative to an orthographic baseline free stem facilitation was greater than bound stem facilitation. In addition, the magnitude of bound (but not free) stem morphological facilitation correlated with the number of morphological relatives.

[1]  Robert F. Stanners,et al.  Memory representation for prefixed words , 1979 .

[2]  M. Taft.  Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect , 1979, Memory & cognition.

[3]  L. Feldman,et al.  Discrepancies between orthographic and unrelated baselines in masked priming undermine a decompositional account of morphological facilitation. , 2002 .

[4]  R. H. Baayen,et al.  The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .

[5]  Laurie Beth Feldman,et al.  Does Prime Modality Influence Morphological Processing? , 2002, Brain and Language.

[6]  Karen Emmorey,et al.  Auditory morphological priming in the lexicon , 1989 .

[7]  K. Forster,et al.  Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? , 1987 .

[8]  K. Forster,et al.  Masked priming for prefixed words with bound stems: Does submit prime permit? , 2000 .

[9]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Morphology by itself in planning the production of spoken words , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[10]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Neighborhood-frequency effects when primes and targets are of different lengths , 2000, Psychological research.

[11]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Morphological structure in language processing , 2003 .

[12]  Marcus Taft,et al.  The representation of bound morphemes in the lexicon: A Chinese study. , 1995 .

[13]  K. Forster,et al.  Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words , 1975 .

[14]  K. Forster,et al.  REPETITION PRIMING AND FREQUENCY ATTENUATION IN LEXICAL ACCESS , 1984 .

[15]  M. Taft.  Prefix Stripping Revisited. , 1981 .

[16]  Robert Schreuder,et al.  The Processing and Representation of Dutch and English Compounds: Peripheral Morphological and Central Orthographic Effects , 2002, Brain and Language.

[17]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[18]  M. W. Bergman,et al.  How Simple Complex Words Can Be: Morphological Processing and Word Representations , 1988 .

[19]  Marcus Taft,et al.  Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing , 1994 .

[20]  Mark Aronoff,et al.  Word Formation in Generative Grammar , 1979 .

[21]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. , 1994 .

[22]  L. Feldman,et al.  What do graded effects of semantic transparency reveal about morphological processing? , 2004, Brain and Language.

[23]  J. Grainger,et al.  Masked morphological priming in visual word recognition. , 1991 .

[24]  Nivja H. de Jong,et al.  The morphological family size effect and morphology , 2000 .

[25]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Morphological units in the Arabic mental lexicon , 2001, Cognition.

[26]  Laurie Beth Feldman,et al.  Are morphological effects distinguishable from the effects of shared meaning and shared form , 2000 .

[27]  Laurie Beth Feldman,et al.  Morphological aspects of language processing. , 1997 .

[28]  S. Bentin,et al.  Morphological Analysis of Disrupted Morphemes: Evidence from Hebrew , 1994, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[29]  Robert Schreuder,et al.  Effects of Family Size for Complex Words , 2000 .