Combining a causal effect criterion for evaluation of facial attractiveness models

Attractiveness is an important attribute of a face that can be understood, predicted, and manipulated. Previous studies on facial attractiveness modeling focused on only prediction power. However, a model with high prediction accuracy may fail in attractiveness manipulation problems. In this paper, we add a causal effect criterion for model selection, which can be measured by imposing interventions according to the models and examining the change of attractiveness. We built a new database containing face images with diverse attractiveness and corresponding human ratings. Several manifold embedding and statistical regression methods are performed for attractiveness modeling. We compare different models under the two criteria and find that the performance of facial attractiveness manipulation depends on the causal effect of the model; feature normalization is a crucial step, without which the model will have small causal effect and fail in attractiveness manipulation; LDA manifold is better than PCA and LPP manifolds in attractiveness prediction; the linear model and the nonlinear SVR model are very similar, implying that facial attractiveness is quite directional. The selected model can be interpreted by common sense and works well for both attractiveness prediction and manipulation problems.

[1]  K. Mardia,et al.  Statistical Shape Analysis , 1998 .

[2]  D. Perrett,et al.  Symmetry and human facial attractiveness. , 1999 .

[3]  PietikainenMatti,et al.  Face Description with Local Binary Patterns , 2006 .

[4]  Lawrence Sirovich,et al.  Application of the Karhunen-Loeve Procedure for the Characterization of Human Faces , 1990, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[5]  Hyeonjoon Moon,et al.  The FERET Evaluation Methodology for Face-Recognition Algorithms , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[6]  Pamela M. Pallett,et al.  New “golden” ratios for facial beauty , 2010, Vision Research.

[7]  Jintu Fan,et al.  Prediction of facial attractiveness from facial proportions , 2012, Pattern Recognit..

[8]  J. Warren,et al.  Image deformation using moving least squares , 2006, SIGGRAPH 2006.

[9]  Yadong Mu Computational facial attractiveness prediction by aesthetics-aware features , 2013, Neurocomputing.

[10]  David Zhang,et al.  A Benchmark for Geometric Facial Beauty Study , 2010, ICMB.

[11]  Xiaogang Jin,et al.  Enhancing the Symmetry and Proportion of 3D Face Geometry , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[12]  I. Penton-Voak In retreat from nature? Successes and concerns in Darwinian approaches to facial attractiveness , 2011 .

[13]  Chengjun Liu,et al.  Gabor feature based classification using the enhanced fisher linear discriminant model for face recognition , 2002, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[14]  Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman,et al.  Facial esthetics in adolescents and its relationship to "ideal" ratios and angles. , 2008, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[15]  Haibin Yan,et al.  Cost-sensitive ordinal regression for fully automatic facial beauty assessment , 2014, Neurocomputing.

[16]  S. Chatterjee,et al.  Influential Observations, High Leverage Points, and Outliers in Linear Regression , 1986 .

[17]  Jiri Matas,et al.  XM2VTSDB: The Extended M2VTS Database , 1999 .

[18]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Statistical models of face images - improving specificity , 1998, Image Vis. Comput..

[19]  Yinhua Liu,et al.  Deep self-taught learning for facial beauty prediction , 2014, Neurocomputing.

[20]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Attractiveness of Facial Averageness and Symmetry in Non-Western Cultures: In Search of Biologically Based Standards of Beauty , 2001, Perception.

[21]  Eytan Ruppin,et al.  Facial Attractiveness: Beauty and the Machine , 2006, Neural Computation.

[22]  D. Perrett,et al.  Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness , 1998, Nature.

[23]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[24]  Dani Lischinski,et al.  Data-driven enhancement of facial attractiveness , 2008, SIGGRAPH 2008.

[25]  David I. Perrett,et al.  What is good is beautiful: Face preference reflects desired personality , 2006 .

[26]  Hatice Gunes,et al.  Assessing facial beauty through proportion analysis by image processing and supervised learning , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[27]  David Zhang,et al.  Quantitative analysis of human facial beauty using geometric features , 2011, Pattern Recognit..

[28]  I R Munro,et al.  Vertical and horizontal proportions of the face in young adult North American Caucasians: revision of neoclassical canons. , 1985, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[29]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  Principal Warps: Thin-Plate Splines and the Decomposition of Deformations , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[30]  P. Hancock,et al.  The role of masculinity and distinctiveness in judgments of human male facial attractiveness. , 2002, British journal of psychology.

[31]  Ashok Samal,et al.  Computation of a face attractiveness index based on neoclassical canons, symmetry, and golden ratios , 2008, Pattern Recognit..

[32]  Xiaofei He,et al.  Locality Preserving Projections , 2003, NIPS.

[33]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  Face Description with Local Binary Patterns: Application to Face Recognition , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[34]  Bingbing Ni,et al.  Towards decrypting attractiveness via multi-modality cues , 2013, TOMCCAP.

[35]  A. Gross,et al.  What is good is beautiful. , 1977 .

[36]  Yihong Gong,et al.  Predicting Facial Beauty without Landmarks , 2010, ECCV.

[37]  Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman,et al.  Putative golden proportions as predictors of facial esthetics in adolescents. , 2008, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[38]  Shigekazu Ishihara,et al.  Effect of averageness and sexual dimorphism on the judgment of facial attractiveness , 2009, Vision Research.

[39]  D. Perrett,et al.  Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness , 1994, Nature.

[40]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Appearance Models , 2001, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..