Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for patients with American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classifications 3 and 4: the minimally invasive approach is associated with significantly quicker recovery and reduced costs

BackgroundConceivably, the benefits of earlier recovery associated with a minimally invasive technique used in laparoscopic colectomy (LC) may be amplified for patients with comorbid disease. The dearth of evidence supporting the safety of laparoscopy for these patients led to a comparison of outcomes between LC and open colectomy (OC) for patients with American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classifications 3 and 4.MethodsData for all ASA 3 and 4 patients who underwent elective LC were reviewed from a prospectively maintained laparoscopic database. The patients who underwent LC were matched with OC patients by age, gender, diagnosis, year, and type of surgery. Estimated blood loss, operation time, time to return of bowel function, length of hospital stay, readmission rate, and 30-day complication and mortality rates were compared using chi-square, Fisher’s exact, and Wilcoxon tests as appropriate. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsIn this study, 231 LCs were matched with 231 OCs. The median age of the patients was 68 years, and 234 (51%) of the patients were male. There were 44 (19%) conversions from LC to OC. More patients in the OC group had undergone previous major laparotomy (5 vs. 15%; p < 0.001). Estimated blood loss, return of bowel function, length of hospital stay, and total direct costs were decreased in the LC group. Wound infection was significantly greater with OC (p = 0.02). When patients with previous major laparotomy were excluded, the two groups had similar overall morbidity. The other benefits of LC, however, persisted.ConclusionThe findings show that LC is a safe option for patients with a high ASA classification. The LC approach is associated with faster postoperative recovery, lower morbidity rates, and lower hospital costs than the OC approach.

[1]  A. Rosman,et al.  Metaanalysis of trials comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for Crohn’s disease , 2005, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[2]  J. Fleshman,et al.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  J. Reed,et al.  Readmissions after colorectal surgery cannot be predicted , 2001, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[4]  C. Zornig,et al.  Laparoscopic resection of sigmoid diverticulitis , 1999, Surgical Endoscopy.

[5]  M. Cadeddu,et al.  Laparoscopic colorectal resection in octogenarians , 2001, Surgical Endoscopy.

[6]  B. Dousset,et al.  The Clinical Outcome of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon Cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2050-2059 , 2004 .

[7]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  Laparoscopic Lysis of Adhesions , 2006, World Journal of Surgery.

[8]  H. Ellis,et al.  Intestinal obstruction from adhesions--how big is the problem? , 1990, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[9]  A. Vernava,et al.  Risk factors for morbidity and mortality after colectomy for colon cancer , 2000, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[10]  A. Senagore,et al.  A critical analysis of laparoscopic colectomy at a single institution: lessons learned after 1000 cases. , 2006, American journal of surgery.

[11]  O. Schwandner,et al.  Laparoscopic colorectal surgery in obese and nonobese patients: Do differences in body mass indices lead to different outcomes? , 2004, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[12]  M. Broder,et al.  Clinical Outcomes and Resource Utilization Associated With Laparoscopic and Open Colectomy Using a Large National Database , 2008, Annals of surgery.

[13]  A. Senagore,et al.  Does Conversion of a Laparoscopic Colectomy Adversely Affect Patient Outcome? , 2004, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[14]  M. Parker,et al.  Postoperative adhesions: Ten-year follow-up of 12,584 patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery , 2001, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[15]  A. Malagón,et al.  Impact of Previous Abdominal Surgery on Colorectal Laparoscopy Results: A Comparative Clinical Study , 2006, Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques.

[16]  R. Veldkamp,et al.  Impact of hospital case volume on short-term outcome after laparoscopic operation for colonic cancer. , 2005, Surgical endoscopy.

[17]  D. Larson,et al.  The Impact of Uncomplicated and Complicated Diverticulitis on Laparoscopic Surgery Conversion Rates and Patient Outcomes , 2007, Surgical Endoscopy.

[18]  H. Lippert,et al.  Laparoscopic surgery in the old patient: do indications and outcomes differ? , 2005, Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.

[19]  E. Weiss,et al.  Is obesity a high-risk factor for laparoscopic colorectal surgery? , 2002, Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques.

[20]  V. Fazio,et al.  Prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopicvs. conventional surgery for refractory ileocolic crohn's disease , 2001, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[21]  A. Senagore,et al.  Is Laparoscopic Colectomy Applicable to Patients With Body Mass Index >30? A Case-Matched Comparative Study With Open Colectomy , 2005, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[22]  R. Veldkamp,et al.  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer : short-term outcomes of a randomised trial , 2022 .

[23]  W. Isbister.  Colorectal surgery in the elderly: an audit of surgery in octogenarians. , 1997, The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery.

[24]  V. Fazio,et al.  Assessment of Operative Risk in Colorectal Cancer Surgery: The Cleveland Clinic Foundation Colorectal Cancer Model , 2004, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[25]  W. Henderson,et al.  Surgical Outcomes for Patients Aged 80 and Older: Morbidity and Mortality from Major Noncardiac Surgery , 2005, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[26]  A. Senagore,et al.  Outcomes and prediction of hospital readmission after intestinal surgery. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[27]  A. Senagore,et al.  Case-Matched Comparison of Clinical and Financial Outcome After Laparoscopic or Open Colorectal Surgery , 2003, Annals of surgery.

[28]  C. Delaney,et al.  Laparoscopic vs open total colectomy: a case-matched comparative study , 2005, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[29]  C. Zornig,et al.  Laparoscopic resection of sigmoid diverticulitis. Results of a multicenter study. Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group. , 1999, Surgical endoscopy.

[30]  Antoni Castells,et al.  Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial , 2002, The Lancet.

[31]  R. Nelson,et al.  Multifactorial index of preoperative risk factors in colon resections , 1992, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[32]  K. Slim,et al.  Postoperative mortality and morbidity in French patients undergoing colorectal surgery: results of a prospective multicenter study. , 2005, Archives of surgery.

[33]  G. Radaelli,et al.  Impact of previous abdominal surgery on the outcome of laparoscopic colectomy: a case-matched control study , 2007, Techniques in Coloproctology.

[34]  A. Senagore,et al.  Laparoscopic colectomy in obese and nonobese patients , 2003, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.

[35]  W. Law,et al.  Laparoscopic colorectal resection: a safe option for elderly patients. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[36]  Philip Quirke,et al.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial , 2005, The Lancet.

[37]  T. Eberlein,et al.  Short-term Endpoints of Conventional Versus Laparoscopic-Assisted Surgery in Patients With Colorectal Cancer (MRC CLASICC Trial): Multicentre, Randomised Controlled TrialGuillou PJ, for the MRC CLASICC Trial Group (St James's Univ Hosp, Leeds, England; et al) Lancet 365:1718–1726, 2005§ , 2006 .