A Minimalist Foundation at Work

What is the nature of mathematics? The different answers given to this perennial question can be gathered from the different theories which have been put forward as foundations of mathematics. In the common contemporary vision, the role of foundations is to provide safe grounds a posteriori for the activity of mathematicians, which on the whole is taken as a matter of fact. This is usually achieved by reducing all concepts of mathematics to that of set, and by postulating sets to form a fixed universe, which exists by itself and is unaffected by any human activity. Thus it is a static vision.

[1]  Bengt Nordström,et al.  Programming in Martin-Lo¨f's type theory: an introduction , 1990 .

[2]  A. Troelstra,et al.  Constructivism in Mathematics: An Introduction , 1988 .

[3]  Maria Emilia Maietti,et al.  About Effective Quotients in Constructive Type Theory , 1998, TYPES.

[4]  Errett Bishop,et al.  Mathematics as a Numerical Language , 1970 .

[5]  Alex Simpson,et al.  Constructive Set Theories and their Category-theoretic Models , 2005, From sets and types to topology and analysis.

[6]  Giovanni Sambin,et al.  Some points in formal topology , 2003, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[7]  J. Hyland The Effective Topos , 1982 .

[8]  M. Dummett Elements of Intuitionism , 2000 .

[9]  Maria Emilia Maietti,et al.  A minimalist two-level foundation for constructive mathematics , 2008, Ann. Pure Appl. Log..

[10]  Silvio Valentini,et al.  Can You Add Power‐Sets to Martin‐Lof's Intuitionistic Set Theory? , 1999, Math. Log. Q..

[11]  Steven J. Vickers,et al.  Compactness in locales and in formal topology , 2006, Ann. Pure Appl. Log..

[12]  Maria Emilia Maietti,et al.  Toward a minimalistic foundation for constructive mathematics , 2005, From sets and types to topology and analysis.

[13]  Maria Emilia Maietti,et al.  Modular correspondence between dependent type theories and categories including pretopoi and topoi , 2005, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science.

[14]  Peter Hancock,et al.  Programming interfaces and basic topology , 2009, Ann. Pure Appl. Log..

[15]  E. Bishop Foundations of Constructive Analysis , 2012 .

[16]  Akiko Kino,et al.  Intuitionism and Proof Theory , 1970 .

[17]  Giulia Battilotti,et al.  Pretopologies and a uniform presentation of sup-lattices, quantales and frames , 2006, Ann. Pure Appl. Log..

[18]  Dimiter G. Skordev Mathematical Logic and Its Applications , 2011 .

[19]  P. T. Johnstone TOPOSES AND LOCAL SET THEORIES: AN INTRODUCTION (Oxford Logic Guides 14) , 1990 .

[20]  G. Sambin Intuitionistic Formal Spaces — A First Communication , 1987 .

[21]  P. Martin-Löf Notes on constructive mathematics , 1970 .

[22]  Per Martin-Löf,et al.  100 years of Zermelo's axiom of choice: what was the problem with it? , 2006, Comput. J..

[23]  Maribel Fernández,et al.  Curry-Style Types for Nominal Terms , 2006, TYPES.

[24]  Giovanni Sambin,et al.  Pretopologies and completeness proofs , 1995, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[25]  Thierry Coquand,et al.  Inductively generated formal topologies , 2003, Ann. Pure Appl. Log..

[26]  John L. Bell,et al.  Toposes and local set theories - an introduction , 1988 .