The nature of predation: prey dependent, ratio dependent or neither?

To describe a predator-prey relationship, it is necessary to specify the rate of prey consumption by an average predator. This functional response largely determines dynamic stability, responses to environmental influences and the nature of indirect effects in the food web containing the predator-prey pair. Nevertheless, measurements of functional responses in nature are quite rare. Recently, much work has been devoted to comparing two idealized forms of the functional response: prey dependent and ratio dependent. Although we agree that predator abundance often affects the consumption rate of individual predators, this phenomenon requires more attention. Disagreement remains over which of the two idealized responses serves as a better starting point in building models when data on predator dependence are absent.

[1]  F. Messier,et al.  UNGULATE POPULATION MODELS WITH PREDATION: A CASE STUDY WITH THE NORTH AMERICAN MOOSE' , 1994 .

[2]  Martin Heimann,et al.  Global and hemispheric CO2 sinks deduced from changes in atmospheric O2 concentration , 1996, Nature.

[3]  John Moncrieff,et al.  The propagation of errors in long‐term measurements of land‐atmosphere fluxes of carbon and water , 1996 .

[4]  S. Diehl,et al.  Daphnia-Phytoplankton Interactions in Lakes: Is There a Need for Ratio-Dependent Consumer-Resource Models? , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[5]  Predator Interference across Trophic Chains , 1995 .

[6]  G. F. Gause.  The struggle for existence , 1971 .

[7]  S. Ellner,et al.  Testing for predator dependence in predator-prey dynamics: a non-parametric approach , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  Donald L. DeAngelis,et al.  A MODEL FOR TROPHIC INTERACTION , 1975 .

[9]  Carl J. Walters,et al.  Invulnerable Prey and the Paradox of Enrichment , 1996 .

[10]  H. Resit Akçakaya,et al.  Consequences of Ratio‐Dependent Predation for Steady‐State Properties of Ecosystems , 1992 .

[11]  Stan D. Wullschleger,et al.  Tree responses to rising CO2 in field experiments: implications for the future forest , 1999 .

[12]  M. McClain,et al.  Dissolved organic matter and terrestrial‐lotic linkages in the Central Amazon Basin of Brazil , 1997 .

[13]  P. Ciais,et al.  A large Northern Hemisphere terrestrial CO_2 sink indicated by the C^ /C^ ratio of atmospheric CO_2. , 1995 .

[14]  Peter A. Abrams,et al.  Strengths of Indirect Effects Generated by Optimal Foraging , 1991 .

[15]  C. S. Holling.  The components of prédation as revealed by a study of small-mammal prédation of the European pine sawfly. , 1959 .

[16]  Robert D. Holt,et al.  RESOLVING ECOLOGICAL QUESTIONS THROUGH META‐ANALYSIS: GOALS, METRICS, AND MODELS , 1999 .

[17]  P. Abrams.  Why Predation Rate Should Not be Proportional to Predator Density , 1993 .

[18]  M. Hassell,et al.  New Inductive Population Model for Insect Parasites and its Bearing on Biological Control , 1969, Nature.

[19]  O. Sarnelle.  Inferring Process from Pattern: Trophic Level Abundances and Imbedded Interactions , 1994 .

[20]  P. Abrams.  Anomalous Predictions of Ratio-Dependent Models of Predation , 1997 .

[21]  Gennady Denisov,et al.  The influence of predator saturation effect and competition among predators on predator-prey system dynamics , 1981 .

[22]  J. Finnigan,et al.  A comment on the paper by Lee (1998): “On micrometeorological observations of surface-air exchange over tall vegetation” , 1999 .

[23]  C. Tucker,et al.  Tropical Deforestation and Habitat Fragmentation in the Amazon: Satellite Data from 1978 to 1988 , 1993, Science.

[24]  I. Hanski.  The functional response of predators: Worries about scale , 1991 .

[25]  Xuhui Lee,et al.  On micrometeorological observations of surface-air exchange over tall vegetation , 1998 .

[26]  John E. Gross,et al.  Functional Response of Herbivores in Food‐Concentrated Patches: Tests of a Mechanistic Model , 1993 .

[27]  Yang Kuang,et al.  Global qualitative analysis of a ratio-dependent predator–prey system , 1998 .

[28]  Peter A. Abrams,et al.  The Fallacies of "Ratio‐Dependent" Predation , 1994 .

[29]  J. Lloyd,et al.  Current perspectives on the terrestrial carbon cycle , 1999 .

[30]  G. Harrison,et al.  Comparing Predator‐Prey Models to Luckinbill's Experiment with Didinium and Paramecium , 1995 .

[31]  C. Peres.  Ground fires as agents of mortality in a Central Amazonian forest , 1999, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[32]  C. Hopkinson,et al.  Effects of global change on carbon storage in tropical forests of South America , 1995 .

[33]  S. L. Lima.  Stress and Decision Making under the Risk of Predation: Recent Developments from Behavioral, Reproductive, and Ecological Perspectives , 1998 .

[34]  P. H. Leslie.  SOME FURTHER NOTES ON THE USE OF MATRICES IN POPULATION MATHEMATICS , 1948 .

[35]  C. Potter,et al.  Large-scale impoverishment of Amazonian forests by logging and fire , 1999, Nature.

[36]  Phillips,et al.  Changes in the carbon balance of tropical forests: evidence from long-term plots , 1998, Science.

[37]  Christian Jost,et al.  About deterministic extinction in ratio-dependent predator-prey models , 1999 .

[38]  H. Tian,et al.  Effect of interannual climate variability on carbon storage in Amazonian ecosystems , 1998, Nature.

[39]  Donald L. DeAngelis,et al.  A Model for Tropic Interaction , 1975 .

[40]  Peter A. Abrams,et al.  Predators that Benefit Prey and Prey that Harm Predators: Unusual Effects of Interacting Foraging Adaptation , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[41]  Richard E. Lenski,et al.  Effect of resource enrichment on a chemostat community of bacteria and bacteriophage , 1997 .

[42]  D. Randall,et al.  Latitudinal gradient of atmospheric CO2 due to seasonal exchange with land biota , 1995, Nature.

[43]  J. Beddington,et al.  Mutual Interference Between Parasites or Predators and its Effect on Searching Efficiency , 1975 .

[44]  J. Fryxell,et al.  DENSITY DEPENDENCE, PREY DEPENDENCE, AND POPULATION DYNAMICS OF MARTENS IN ONTARIO , 1999 .

[45]  R. Arditi,et al.  Emergence of donor control in patchy predator—prey systems , 1998 .

[46]  Roger Arditi,et al.  Ratio-Dependent Predation: An Abstraction That Works , 1995 .

[47]  M. Hassell.  The dynamics of arthropod predator-prey systems. , 1979, Monographs in population biology.

[48]  P. Turchin,et al.  An Empirically Based Model for Latitudinal Gradient in Vole Population Dynamics , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[49]  J. Moen,et al.  The Time-Scale Problem in Exploiter-Victim Models: Does the Solution Lie in Ratio-Dependent Exploitation? , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[50]  C. Potter,et al.  Regional application of an ecosystem production model for studies of biogeochemistry in Brazilian Amazonia , 1998 .

[51]  Marten Scheffer,et al.  Implications of spatial heterogeneity for the paradox of enrichment , 1995 .

[52]  M. Lerdau,et al.  ISOPRENE EMISSION AND PHOTOSYNTHESIS IN A TROPICAL FOREST CANOPY: IMPLICATIONS FOR MODEL DEVELOPMENT , 1999 .

[53]  R. K. Dixon,et al.  Carbon Pools and Flux of Global Forest Ecosystems , 1994, Science.

[54]  L. Tranvik,et al.  Consumption patterns, complexity and enrichment in aquatic food chains , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[55]  R. Arditi,et al.  Coupling in predator-prey dynamics: Ratio-Dependence , 1989 .

[56]  John D. Reeve,et al.  Predation and bark beetle dynamics , 1997, Oecologia.

[57]  D. DeAngelis,et al.  Effects of spatial grouping on the functional response of predators. , 1999, Theoretical population biology.

[58]  Peter J. Morin,et al.  Productivity controls food-chain properties in microbial communities , 1998, Nature.

[59]  Lev R. Ginzburg,et al.  Assuming reproduction to be a function of consumption raises doubts about some popular predator–prey models , 1998 .