Effectiveness of interventions in reducing pesticide overexposure and poisonings.

OBJECTIVE The objective of this paper was to review the effectiveness of interventions to reduce pesticide overexposure and poisonings in worker populations. METHODS We used the Cochrane Collaboration search strategy to search the following databases for articles that tested the effectiveness of interventions in reducing human pesticide exposure or poisonings: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSHTC). Interventions considered included comparisons of pesticide application methods, pesticide mixing methods, worker education, biological monitoring programs, personal protective equipment (PPE) use, pesticide substitutions, and legislation. The outcomes of interest included biological monitoring measures or personal exposure monitoring indicating a reduction of pesticide exposure, observed increased use of PPE, reduction in lost workdays, and where possible, evidence of changes in pesticide poisoning rates as identified by registries and population surveys. Studies were reviewed in depth with special attention to size and study design. RESULTS Most studies evaluated exposure during differing configurations of PPE or during different mixing or handling methods. Most studies were small field tests of protective equipment involving less than 20 workers. Some studies examined biological indices of exposure such as cholinesterase or urinary metabolites. Studies showed that PPE was effective in reducing exposure. No controlled studies were found that addressed reducing pesticide poisonings. CONCLUSIONS Changes in application procedures, packaging, mixing, use of personal protective equipment, and biological monitoring reduced pesticide exposure under controlled conditions. Cholinesterase monitoring can identify workers with a higher risk of overexposure. Most techniques were not tested in actual worksite programs. Interventions should be examined for their ability to reduce pesticide overexposure in actual working populations. No controlled evaluations of large legislative initiatives were found.

[1]  Fillmore Cm,et al.  A cholinesterase testing program for pesticide applicators. , 1993 .

[2]  A R Putnam,et al.  Exposure of pesticide applicators to nitrofen: influence of formulation, handling systems, and protective garments. , 1983, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[3]  R. Krieger,et al.  Exposure to pesticide mixer/loaders and applicators in California. , 1992, Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[4]  R. Jackson,et al.  Cholinesterase activity depression among California agricultural pesticide applicators. , 1989, American journal of industrial medicine.

[5]  H. F. Enos,et al.  Reduction of pesticide exposure with protective clothing for applicators and mixers. , 1982, Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association.

[6]  Richard A. Fenske,et al.  Pesticide Exposure during Greenhouse Applications, Part I. Dermal Exposure Reduction Due to Directional Ventilation and Worker Training , 1994 .

[7]  Richard A. Fenske.  Comparative Assessment of Protective Clothing Performance by Measurement of Dermal Exposure during Pesticide Applications , 1988 .

[8]  Richard A. Fenske,et al.  Pesticide Exposure During Greenhouse Applications. III. Variable Exposure Due to Ventilation Conditions and Spray Pressure , 1996 .

[9]  R A Fenske,et al.  Worker exposure and protective clothing performance during manual seed treatment with lindane , 1990, Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[10]  R A Fenske,et al.  Occupational exposure to fosetyl-Al fungicide during spraying of ornamentals in greenhouses , 1987, Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[11]  P. Schnitzer,et al.  Development of a surveillance program for occupational pesticide poisoning: lessons learned and future directions. , 1999, Public health reports (1974).

[12]  J. Blondell,et al.  Epidemiology of pesticide poisonings in the United States, with special reference to occupational cases. , 1997, Occupational medicine.

[13]  D. Revitt,et al.  The influence of personal protection, environmental hygiene and exposure to pesticides on the health of immigrant farm workers in a desert country , 1999, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[14]  Richard A. Fenske,et al.  Pesticide Exposure during Greenhouse Applications, Part II. Chemical Permeation Through Protective Clothing in Contact with Treated Foliage , 1994 .

[15]  J. Sanborn,et al.  Monitoring the pesticide-exposed worker. , 1997, Occupational medicine.

[16]  C. Beahler,et al.  Information retrieval in systematic reviews: challenges in the public health arena. , 2000, American journal of preventive medicine.

[17]  W. F. Durham,et al.  Measurement of the exposure of workers to pesticides. , 1962, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[18]  R. Magnotti,et al.  Hazards of closed pesticide mixing and loading systems: the paradox of protective technology in the Third World. , 1992, British journal of industrial medicine.

[19]  F Lander,et al.  Indoor application of anti-cholinesterase agents and the influence of personal protection on uptake , 1992, Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[20]  H.N. Nigg,et al.  Protection afforded greenhouse pesticide applicators by coveralls: A field test , 1993, Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[21]  J. Nielsen,et al.  Anti-cholinesterase agents uptake during cultivation of greenhouse flowers , 1992, Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology.