CAR OWNERSHIP DEMAND MODELING USING MACHINE LEARNING: DECISION TREES AND NEURAL NETWORKS

A household car ownership modeling is crucial in understanding the impact on an individual’s or a family’s travel behavior in traveling demand analysis. Trips or tours as a unit of analysis can be used in the modeling of car ownership demand for analyzing travel needs. Machine learning is widely used to describe a car owner’s decision since the machine learning model was specifically designed to give more accurate predictions through a variety of mechanisms. This research presents car ownership modeling using two types of machine learning models, including decision trees and neural networks. The impacts of socio-demographic attributes on household car ownership demand are discussed and compared against these two models after adding the main attributes of variables from tour-based models. Data was collected from 2,015 households surveyed in Khon Kaen Province, Thailand, conducted in 2015. The outcomes indicate that the machine learning model can be used to predict household car ownership. It also found that when using the default parameters across all datasets, whereas the neural networks provide a more accurate result than the decision tree algorithm. However, in cases where the household car ownership prediction from the dataset with add attributes of the key variable used in tour-based models. In that case, the neural networks algorithm would give a prediction accuracy that corresponded to results as found from the prediction using a dataset with only the household's socio-demographic attributes.

[1]  Yusak O. Susilo,et al.  Comparison of Vehicle-Ownership Models , 2008 .

[2]  C. Bhat,et al.  A COMPARISON OF TWO ALTERNATIVE BEHAVIORAL CHOICE MECHANISMS FOR HOUSEHOLD AUTO OWNERSHIP DECISIONS , 1998 .

[3]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  WORK TRAVEL MODE CHOICE AND NUMBER OF NON-WORK COMMUTE STOPS , 1997 .

[4]  Teresa Pamuła,et al.  Neural Networks in Transportation Research-Recent Applications , 2016 .

[5]  Nicanor R. Roxas ESTIMATING THE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF THE CAR SHIFTING BEHAVIOR ALONG EDSA , 2018 .

[6]  Susan L Handy,et al.  Correlation or causality between the built environment and travel behavior? Evidence from Northern California , 2005 .

[7]  Frank Witlox,et al.  Car ownership as a mediating variable in car travel behaviour research using a structural equation modelling approach to identify its dual relationship , 2010 .

[8]  Anabele Lindner,et al.  Comparing decision tree algorithms to estimate intercity trip distribution , 2017 .

[9]  P. Kanaroglou,et al.  Modelling car ownership in urban areas: a case study of Hamilton, Canada , 2008 .

[10]  J. Raymond,et al.  Changes in the structure of car ownership in Spain , 2008 .

[11]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Handbook of Transport Modelling: 2nd Edition , 2007 .

[12]  Eleni I. Vlahogianni,et al.  Statistical methods versus neural networks in transportation research: Differences, similarities and some insights , 2011 .

[13]  Una-May O'Reilly,et al.  Machine learning or discrete choice models for car ownership demand estimation and prediction? , 2017, 2017 5th IEEE International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS).

[14]  P. Hermawati CHOICES MODELS OF TRIP CHAIN AND TRANSPORTATION MODE FOR INTERNATIONAL TOURISTS IN TOURISM DESTINATION ISLAND , 2019, International Journal of GEOMATE.

[15]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Tour-Based Model Development for TxDOT: Evaluation and Transition Steps , 2009 .

[16]  Chi Xie,et al.  WORK TRAVEL MODE CHOICE MODELING USING DATA MINING: DECISION TREES AND NEURAL NETWORKS , 2002 .

[17]  Yunlong Zhang,et al.  Travel Mode Choice Modeling with Support Vector Machines , 2008 .

[18]  Alan J Horowitz Statewide Travel Forecasting Models , 2006 .

[19]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand , 1985 .