Key Topics in Landscape Ecology: Scale and scaling: a cross-disciplinary perspective

Scale and heterogeneity are two key concepts in landscape ecology which are inherently related. Scale would matter little in a world where entities and relationships remain invariant across space or time, or in a landscape that is spatially or temporally homogeneous (i.e., uniform or random). However, real landscapes are heterogeneous biophysically and socioeconomically, and they must be treated as such for most questions and problems that interest us as scientists or citizens. Spatial heterogeneity – the diversity of entities and their spatial arrangement – is one of the most essential and unifying features of all natural and anthropogenic systems. Landscape heterogeneity is the manifestation of patchiness (discrete patterns) and gradients (continuous variations) that are intertwined across multiple spatial scales. Thus, scale is indispensable for describing and understanding landscape pattern. It is not surprising, therefore, that scale has become one of the most fundamental concepts in landscape ecology, a field that focuses prominently on spatial heterogeneity and its ecological consequences (Risser et al. 1984, Forman and Godron 1986, Forman 1995, Turner et al. 2001). In fact, landscape ecology has been widely recognized by biologists, geographers, and even social scientists for its leading role in studying scale issues (McBratney 1998, Marceau 1999, Withers and Meentemeyer 1999, Meadowcroft 2002, Sayre 2005). However, it was not until the 1980s that the notion of scale began to gain its prominence in landscape ecology (and in ecology in general). Also, landscape ecology is not the only discipline that deals with scale and spatial pattern. The goal of geographical research is to describe and explain the spatial patterns of natural and anthropogenic features on the Earth’s surface (Harvey 1968), and scale as a

[1]  W. S. Robinson Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. , 1950, International journal of epidemiology.

[2]  David M. Raup,et al.  How Nature Works: The Science of Self-Organized Criticality , 1997 .

[3]  Jianguo Wu,et al.  The modifiable areal unit problem and implications for landscape ecology , 1996, Landscape Ecology.

[4]  C. Poole Ecologic analysis as outlook and method. , 1994, American journal of public health.

[5]  Paul L. Rosin Robust pixel unmixing , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[6]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Predicting across scales: Theory development and testing , 1989, Landscape Ecology.

[7]  H. Cyr,et al.  AN ILLUSION OF MECHANISTIC UNDERSTANDING , 2004 .

[8]  J. Wiens Spatial Scaling in Ecology , 1989 .

[9]  Jerome Sacks,et al.  Ecological Regression and Voting Rights , 1991 .

[10]  Jan Kozłowski,et al.  Is West, Brown and Enquist's model of allometric scaling mathematically correct and biologically relevant? , 2004 .

[11]  H. Alker A typology of ecological fallacies , 1969 .

[12]  Lieven Verbeke,et al.  Sub-pixel mapping and sub-pixel sharpening using neural network predicted wavelet coefficients , 2004 .

[13]  Nicholas J. Clifford,et al.  Progress in Physical Geography: retrospect and prospect 2009—10 , 2009 .

[14]  Michael LaBarbera,et al.  ANALYZING BODY SIZE AS A FACTOR IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION , 1989 .

[15]  F. Hainsworth Scaling: why is animal size so important? , 1985 .

[16]  O. Loucks,et al.  From Balance of Nature to Hierarchical Patch Dynamics: A Paradigm Shift in Ecology , 1995, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[17]  Stephen Wolfram,et al.  Cellular automata as models of complexity , 1984, Nature.

[18]  R. O'Neill,et al.  Scale problems in reporting landscape pattern at the regional scale , 1996, Landscape Ecology.

[19]  Robert V. O'Neill,et al.  Transmutation and functional representation of heterogeneous landscapes , 1991, Landscape Ecology.

[20]  Bruce T. Milne,et al.  Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape pattern , 1989, Landscape Ecology.

[21]  Kurt H. Riitters,et al.  Sensitivity of landscape metrics to pixel size , 1995 .

[22]  B. Hewitson,et al.  Climate downscaling: techniques and application , 1996 .

[23]  G. D. Jenerette,et al.  © 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. Research Article Analysis and simulation of land-use change in the central Arizona – , 2022 .

[24]  S. Levin,et al.  Mathematical and Computational Challenges in Population Biology and Ecosystems Science , 1997, Science.

[25]  V. Meentemeyer,et al.  Concepts of Scale in Landscape Ecology , 1999 .

[26]  C. E. Gehlke,et al.  Certain Effects of Grouping upon the Size of the Correlation Coefficient in Census Tract Material , 1934 .

[27]  A. Henderson‐sellers,et al.  Sensitivity of ecosystem models to the spatial resolution of the NCAR Community Climate Model CCM2 , 1998 .

[28]  H. Stommel,et al.  Varieties of Oceanographic Experience , 1963 .

[29]  S. Levin,et al.  Theories of Simplification and Scaling of Spatially Distributed Processes , 2011 .

[30]  Anthony W King,et al.  Aggregating Fine-Scale Ecological Knowledge to Model Coarser-Scale Attributes of Ecosystems. , 1992, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[31]  James M. Murphy,et al.  Predictions of climate change over Europe using statistical and dynamical downscaling techniques , 2000 .

[32]  James F. Reynolds,et al.  7 – Scaling Ecophysiology from the Plant to the Ecosystem: A Conceptual Framework , 1993 .

[33]  David W. S. Wong The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem (MAUP) , 2004 .

[34]  Gerard B. M. Heuvelink Uncertainty analysis in environmental modelling under a change of spatial scale , 1998 .

[35]  Robert V. O'Neill,et al.  A hierarchical perspective can help scientists understand spatial patterns , 2007 .

[36]  Conghe Song,et al.  Spectral mixture analysis for subpixel vegetation fractions in the urban environment: How to incorporate endmember variability? , 2005 .

[37]  D. Marceau The Scale Issue in the Social and Natural Sciences , 1999 .

[38]  Gerard B.M. Heuvelink,et al.  Uncertainty analysis in environmental modelling under a change of spatial scale , 1998, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[39]  E. Rastetter,et al.  Using Mechanistic Models to Scale Ecological Processes across Space and Time , 2003 .

[40]  T. Wigley,et al.  Downscaling general circulation model output: a review of methods and limitations , 1997 .

[41]  S. Openshaw A million or so correlation coefficients : three experiments on the modifiable areal unit problem , 1979 .

[42]  D. Freedman Ecological Inference and the Ecological Fallacy , 1999 .

[43]  Christopher J. Duffy Scale Dependence and Scale Invariance in Hydrology , 2002 .

[44]  Debra P. C. Peters,et al.  Strategies for ecological extrapolation , 2004 .

[45]  HERBERT A. SIMON,et al.  The Architecture of Complexity , 1991 .

[46]  Santiago Saura,et al.  Effects of remote sensor spatial resolution and data aggregation on selected fragmentation indices , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[47]  B. Hewitson,et al.  Scale Interactions and Regional Climate: Examples from the Susquehanna River Basin , 2002 .

[48]  T. Wigley,et al.  Statistical downscaling of general circulation model output: A comparison of methods , 1998 .

[49]  Arthur S. Lieberman,et al.  Landscape Ecology , 1994, Springer New York.

[50]  Geoffrey J. Hay,et al.  Detecting dominant landscape objects through multiple scales: An integration of object-specific methods and watershed segmentation , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[51]  Michael Ostland,et al.  Response to King's Comment , 1999 .

[52]  Mary Ann Simmons,et al.  A Bayesian test of hierarchy theory: scaling up variability in plant cover from field to remotely sensed data , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[53]  J. Meadowcroft,et al.  Politics and scale: some implications for environmental governance , 2002 .

[54]  James H Brown,et al.  The fractal nature of nature: power laws, ecological complexity and biodiversity. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[55]  C. Amrhein Searching for the Elusive Aggregation Effect: Evidence from Statistical Simulations , 1995 .

[56]  S. Schwartz The fallacy of the ecological fallacy: the potential misuse of a concept and the consequences. , 1994, American journal of public health.

[57]  V. Meentemeyer Geographical perspectives of space, time, and scale , 1989, Landscape Ecology.

[58]  David J. Sailor,et al.  Application of tree-structured regression for regional precipitation prediction using general circulation model output , 2000 .

[59]  Robert V. O'Neill,et al.  Neutral models for the analysis of broad-scale landscape pattern , 1987, Landscape Ecology.

[60]  Alex. B. McBratney,et al.  Some considerations on methods for spatially aggregating and disaggregating soil information , 1998, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[61]  Jianguo Wu,et al.  A patch-based spatial modeling approach: conceptual framework and simulation scheme , 1997 .

[62]  A S Fotheringham,et al.  The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem in Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1991 .

[63]  C. Thompson,et al.  A Comparison of Statistical and Model-Based Downscaling Techniques for Estimating Local Climate Variations. , 1998 .

[64]  P. Risser,et al.  Landscape ecology: Directions and approaches , 1984 .

[65]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Estimation of sub-pixel land cover composition in the presence of untrained classes , 2000 .

[66]  Simon A. Levin,et al.  A Spatial Patch Dynamic Modeling Approach to Pattern and Process in an Annual Grassland , 1994 .

[67]  W. Calder,et al.  ECOLOGICAL SCALING: MAMMALS AND BIRDS , 1983 .

[68]  R. Hobbs,et al.  Key issues and research priorities in landscape ecology: An idiosyncratic synthesis , 2002, Landscape Ecology.

[69]  James M. Murphy,et al.  An Evaluation of Statistical and Dynamical Techniques for Downscaling Local Climate , 1999 .

[70]  M. Watson,et al.  The Scale Problem in Human Geography , 1978 .

[71]  D. Freedman,et al.  A solution to the ecological inference problem , 1997 .

[72]  Jian-guo Wu Hierarchy and scaling: Extrapolating informa-tion along a scaling ladder , 1999 .

[73]  Application of Landscape Allometry to Restoration of Tidal Channels , 2002 .

[74]  Bruce T. Milne,et al.  Spatial Aggregation and Neutral Models in Fractal Landscapes , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[75]  A. King Translating models across scales in the landscape , 1991 .

[76]  E. E. Miller,et al.  Physical Theory for Capillary Flow Phenomena , 1956 .

[77]  R. O'Neill A Hierarchical Concept of Ecosystems. , 1986 .

[78]  N. Sayre Ecological and geographical scale: parallels and potential for integration , 2005 .

[79]  G. J. Hay,et al.  A multiscale framework for landscape analysis: Object-specific analysis and upscaling , 2001, Landscape Ecology.

[80]  J. Lancaster,et al.  Inferring landscape dynamics of bog pools from scaling relationships and spatial patterns , 2002 .

[81]  P. Greig-Smith,et al.  The Use of Random and Contiguous Quadrats in the Study of the Structure of Plant Communities , 1952 .

[82]  D. Schneider Scaling Theory: Application to Marine Ornithology , 2002, Ecosystems.

[83]  P. Klinkhamer Plant allometry: The scaling of form and process , 1995 .

[84]  David J. Tongway,et al.  A Scaling Rule for Landscape Patches and How It Applies to Conserving Soil Resources in Savannas , 2000, Ecosystems.

[85]  Jianguo Wu Modelling the energy exchange processes between plant communities and environment , 1990 .

[86]  R. H. Gardner,et al.  Quantifying scale-dependent effects of animal movement with simple percolation models , 1989, Landscape Ecology.

[87]  David Harvey,et al.  Pattern, Process, and the Scale Problem in Geographical Research , 1968 .

[88]  Robert V. O'Neill,et al.  Heterogeneity and spatial hierarchies , 1991 .

[89]  F. Bokma Evidence against universal metabolic allometry , 2004 .