Positioning Errors and Efficiency in Fiber Spectrographs

The use of wide-field multiobject fiber-input spectrographs for large redshift surveys introduces the possibility of variations in the observed signal-to-noise ratio across the survey area due to errors in positioning the fibers with respect to the target image positions, leading to position-dependent errors in the survey catalog. This paper brings together a comprehensive description of the sources of fiber-to-image position errors in different instrument designs and quantifies their effects on the efficiency with which signal is recorded. For point sources, a function relating a fractional efficiency and an equivalent aperture correction to the fiber-to-image position error, the fiber diameter, and the image size is plotted for typical values of fiber and image sizes found in current instruments. The tools required by observers to maximize the efficiency of fiber-spectrographic surveys are discussed.

[1]  John E. Davis,et al.  Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Early Data Release , 2002 .

[2]  A. V. Filippenko,et al.  THE IMPORTANCE OF ATMOSPHERIC DIFFERENTIAL REFRACTION IN SPECTROPHOTOMETRY. , 1982 .

[3]  Quentin A. Parker,et al.  Wide-field multifiber spectroscopy with FLAIR II , 1994, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation.

[4]  A. Andrei,et al.  Investigation of USNO-A2.0 Catalog Positions , 2001 .

[5]  Neville J. Woolf,et al.  High Resolution Imaging From the Ground , 1982 .

[6]  T. Ingerson,et al.  LOCATING STARS WITH A MULTIPLE-OBJECT SPECTROGRAPH - ARGUS , 1990 .

[7]  C. G. Wynne Systematic losses in fibre-fed spectrographs , 1992 .

[8]  Roger G. Clowes,et al.  The New Era of Wide‐Field Astronomy , 2001 .

[9]  Brian McLean,et al.  The Guide Star Catalog. II. Photometric and Astrometric Models and Solutions , 1990 .

[10]  R. V. Willstrop Atmospheric dispersion compensator for a wide-field three-mirror telescope , 1987 .

[11]  Jean Gabriel Cuby Observational aspects in multi-object fiber spectroscopy , 1994, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation.

[12]  E. al.,et al.  The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical summary , 2000, astro-ph/0006396.

[13]  Mario G. Lattanzi,et al.  Two successful techniques for Schmidt plate astrometry , 1990 .

[14]  Daniel Golombek,et al.  New Horizons from Multi-Wavelength Sky Surveys , 1998 .

[15]  Ivan R. King,et al.  THE PROFILE OF A STAR IMAGE , 1971 .

[16]  Stuart Bowyer,et al.  Optimum choice of fiber diameter for multiple-object spectroscopy , 1988 .

[17]  Jay V. Bixler,et al.  THE IMPLICATIONS OF ATMOSPHERIC EFFECTS FOR FIBER-FED SPECTROSCOPY , 1989 .

[18]  Bruce Margony The Sloan Digital Sky Survey , 1999, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.