Neural network‐based array synthesis in presence of obstacles

Traditional antenna array synthesis methods are based on the reconstruction of the array factor coefficients or an equivalent current distribution over a surface enclosing the antenna. The coefficients are then used to estimate the amplitude and phase of the feeding voltages that must be applied to the ports of the array in order to generate a radiated field distribution according to a given set of specifications. These approaches consider implicitly that the radiating elements are ideal, without any interaction between them. Coupling effects between the individual radiating elements once inserted in the array might modify their radiation properties and the necessary feeding values for a specified radiated field distribution, affecting significantly to the global behaviour of the array. Neural networks (NN) offer an efficient way to incorporate the real radiating properties and the coupling effects between the elements of an array in the synthesis process without increasing the complexity of the model from the designer's point of view. Once the coupling effects are modelled, they can be used to perform synthesis tasks in presence of any obstacle in a near environment, which can be modelled as a part of the array, with the induced currents established by the coupling effects taken into account in the NN learning procedure. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  R. G. Ayestaran,et al.  Neural networks and equivalent source reconstruction for real antenna array synthesis , 2003 .

[2]  Christos G. Christodoulou,et al.  Neural network-based adaptive beamforming for one- and two-dimensional antenna arrays , 1998 .

[3]  E. Moreno,et al.  Planar arrays with square lattices and circular boundaries: sum patterns from distributions with uniform, amplitude or very low dynamic-range ratio , 2001 .

[4]  Jean-Jacques Laurin,et al.  An implementation of a direction-finding antenna for mobile communications using a neural network , 1999 .

[5]  R. Harrington Time-Harmonic Electromagnetic Fields , 1961 .

[6]  Jose C. Principe,et al.  Neural and adaptive systems : fundamentals through simulations , 2000 .

[7]  H. Steyskal Synthesis of antenna patterns with imposed near-field nulls , 1994 .

[8]  G J Burke,et al.  Numerical Electromagnetic Code (NEC) - Method of Moments. A User-Oriented Computer Code for Analysis of the Electromagnetic Response of Antennas and Other Metal Structures. Part III. User's Guide. Volume 2. Revised. , 1977 .

[9]  Roger F. Harrington,et al.  Field computation by moment methods , 1968 .

[10]  F ROSENBLATT,et al.  The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. , 1958, Psychological review.

[11]  T. H. O'Donnell,et al.  Direction finding in phased arrays with a neural network beamformer , 1995 .

[12]  Michael Georgiopoulos,et al.  Performance of radial-basis function networks for direction of arrival estimation with antenna arrays , 1997 .

[13]  S. Rengarajan,et al.  Genetic algorithms in the design and optimization of antenna array patterns , 1999 .

[14]  L.F. Herran,et al.  Neural network-based pattern synthesis of array antennas with element specification , 2004, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society Symposium, 2004..

[15]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1998 .

[16]  Michael Georgiopoulos,et al.  A neural network-based smart antenna for multiple source tracking , 2000 .

[17]  Tapan K. Sarkar,et al.  A direct optimization approach for source reconstruction and NF-FF transformation using amplitude-only data , 2002 .

[18]  Alejandro Pazos,et al.  Avoiding interference in planar arrays through the use of artificial neural networks , 2002 .

[19]  F. Girosi,et al.  Networks for approximation and learning , 1990, Proc. IEEE.