Guidance on variables characterising water bodies including sustainable flood retention basins.

Climate change is likely to increase the frequency of flood events, thus increasing the associated hazard. This may threaten some existing flood defences, which were designed and built prior to climate change being identified as a major issue; therefore, they may require modification to ensure their sustainability. The European Union recognises that member states may face significant challenges in implementing the Flood Directive and has responded with programs such as the Strategic Alliance for Water Management Actions, which aims to provide tools and guidance to aid the member states in implementation. Flooding is a complex spatial planning issue and therefore requires a range of tools and approaches to solve the problem. Solutions are likely to require sustainable (urban) drainage system (SUDS) solutions applied on a small scale combined with sustainable flood retention basins (SFRB) used on a large scale. This paper aims to provide guidance on 40 variables used to rapidly assess water bodies including SFRB in terms of their flood and diffuse pollution control purposes and potentials. The variables described should be the basis for the characterisation of SFRB, which are adaptive structural measures well integrated within the landscape promoting best management practice as part of a sustainable flood risk management strategy. The variables engineered, outlet arrangement, aquatic animal passage, land animal passage, basin and channel connectivity, seasonal influence, relative total pollution and flotsam cover are novel. The list includes sum parameter such as relative total pollution, which address as part of a simplified methodology several complex environmental processes.

[1]  Lee E. Brown,et al.  Environmental effects of drainage, drain-blocking and prescribed vegetation burning in UK upland peatlands , 2009 .

[2]  T. Rowell Management planning guidance for protected sites in the UK; a comparison of decision-making processes in nine guides , 2009 .

[3]  Olena Kravchuk,et al.  Sensitivity of drainage to rainfall, vegetation and soil characteristics , 2009 .

[4]  Doerthe Tetzlaff,et al.  Influence of hydrology and seasonality on DOC exports from three contrasting upland catchments , 2008 .

[5]  M. C. Watzin,et al.  Aquatic ecosystems in agricultural landscapes: A review of ecological indicators and achievable ecological outcomes , 1999 .

[6]  Gerhard Kuhn,et al.  13. Data report: Bulk sediment composition, grain-size, clay and silt mineralogy of Pleistocene sediments from ODP Leg 177 Sites 1089 and 1090. , 2003 .

[7]  G. de Marsily,et al.  Relations between triazine flux, catchment topography and distance between maize fields and the drainage network , 2000 .

[8]  Suzanne E. Bayley,et al.  Effects of river connectivity on marsh vegetation community structure and species richness in montane floodplain wetlands in Jasper National Park, Alberta, Canada , 2008 .

[9]  Lee H. MacDonald,et al.  Measurement and prediction of natural and anthropogenic sediment sources, St. John, U.S. Virgin Islands , 2007 .

[10]  T. Wilbanks,et al.  Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[11]  Fabián A. Bombardelli,et al.  Modeling linkages between sediment resuspension and water quality in a shallow, eutrophic, wind-exposed lake , 2009 .

[12]  Miklas Scholz,et al.  Classification methodology for Sustainable Flood Retention Basins , 2007 .

[13]  Marco Mancini,et al.  Flood hydrograph attenuation induced by a reservoir system: analysis with a distributed rainfall‐runoff model , 2004 .

[14]  John N. Quinton,et al.  Diffuse Pollution Swapping in Arable Agricultural Systems , 2009 .

[15]  Axel Bronstert,et al.  Multi‐scale modelling of land‐use change and river training effects on floods in the Rhine basin , 2007 .

[16]  Fred Worrall,et al.  Regional lead isotope study of a polluted river catchment: River Wear, Northern England, UK. , 2009, The Science of the total environment.

[17]  Paul J. A. Withers,et al.  Transport and delivery of suspended solids, nitrogen and phosphorus from various sources to freshwaters in the UK , 2008 .

[18]  J. Palutikof,et al.  Climate change 2007 : impacts, adaptation and vulnerability , 2001 .

[19]  Miklas Scholz,et al.  Conceptual classification model for Sustainable Flood Retention Basins. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[20]  J. Burkholder,et al.  Harmful algal blooms and eutrophication: Nutrient sources, composition, and consequences , 2002 .

[21]  B. Qin,et al.  The contribution of phytoplankton degradation to chromophoric dissolved organic matter (CDOM) in eutrophic shallow lakes: field and experimental evidence. , 2009, Water research.

[22]  K. Heal,et al.  Manganese and land-use in upland catchments in Scotland. , 2001, The Science of the total environment.

[23]  Miklas Scholz,et al.  Wetland Systems to Control Urban Runoff , 2006 .

[24]  Jesús Álvarez-Mozos,et al.  Determination of long-term erosion rates in vineyards of Navarre (Spain) using botanical benchmarks , 2009 .

[25]  T. R Nisbet,et al.  The role of forest management in controlling diffuse pollution from the afforestation and clearfelling of two public water supply catchments in Argyll, West Scotland , 2002 .

[26]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  Ecological Census Techniques: Contents , 1996 .

[27]  Liisa Ukonmaanaho,et al.  Recent organic matter accumulation in relation to some climatic factors in ombrotrophic peat bogs near heavy metal emission sources in Finland , 2006 .