Comparison of Student Experiences with Different Online Graduate Courses in Health Promotion

The purpose of this study was to understand the experience of students as they progressed through three specific online graduate courses in health promotion studies delivered primarily by asynchronous computer conferencing. Focused teleconference discussions were conducted with approximately 45 students from the different courses and the transcripts subjected to qualitative analysis. Themes that emerged included what new students appreciated most when adapting to learning online, factors that contributed to learner satisfaction, and the difficulties encountered by students taking a course when the content was not as well suited to the instructional method. The findings are discussed in relation to the three components of Garrison, Anderson and Archer’s (2000) Community of Inquiry model of learning: cognitive, social and teacher presence. Implications are presented for assisting students with the process of adapting to online learning and enhancing the ‘fit’ between course content and online instructional methods.

[1]  David M Kennedy,et al.  Dimensions of distance: a comparison of classroom education and distance education. , 2002, Nurse education today.

[2]  R. Clark.  Media will never influence learning , 1994 .

[3]  C. Gunawardena,et al.  Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer‐mediated conferencing environment , 1997 .

[4]  Stanley Varnhagen,et al.  Instructors’ Adaptation to Online Graduate Education in Health Promotion: A Qualitative Study , 2007 .

[5]  Richard A. Schwier,et al.  Content and Community Redux: Instructor and Student Interpretations of Online Communication in a Graduate Seminar , 2003 .

[6]  Richard A. Krueger,et al.  Focus groups : a practical guide for applied research / by Richard A. Krueger , 1989 .

[7]  D. Garrison,et al.  Assessing Social Presence In Asynchronous Text-based Computer Conferencing , 1999 .

[8]  Elizabeth J. Burge,et al.  Learning in a computer conferenced contexts: The learner''s perspective , 2008 .

[9]  Uschi Felix,et al.  A multivariate analysis of students' experience of web based learning , 2001 .

[10]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education , 1999, Internet High. Educ..

[11]  E. Stacey.  Collaborative Learning in an Online Environment , 1999 .

[12]  Derek A. Holton,et al.  Students' Satisfaction and Perceived Learning with a Web-based Course , 2003, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[13]  D. Morgan.  Focus groups for qualitative research. , 1988, Hospital guest relations report.

[14]  Richard A. Schwier,et al.  The Interplay of Content and Community in Synchronous and Asynchronous Communication: Virtual Communication in a Graduate Seminar , 2002 .

[15]  Chih-Hsiung Tu,et al.  The Measurement of Social Presence in an Online Learning Environment , 2002 .

[16]  Russell T. Hurlburt.  “Lectlets” Deliver Content at a Distance: Introductory Statistics as a Case Study , 2001 .