Higher-order aggregate networks in the analysis of temporal networks: path structures and centralities

AbstractDespite recent advances in the study of temporal networks, the analysis of time-stamped network data is still a fundamental challenge. In particular, recent studies have shown that correlations in the ordering of links crucially alter causal topologies of temporal networks, thus invalidating analyses based on static, time-aggregated representations of time-stamped data. These findings not only highlight an important dimension of complexity in temporal networks, but also call for new network-analytic methods suitable to analyze complex systems with time-varying topologies. Addressing this open challenge, here we introduce a novel framework for the study of path-based centralities in temporal networks. Studying betweenness, closeness and reach centrality, we first show than an application of these measures to time-aggregated, static representations of temporal networks yields misleading results about the actual importance of nodes. To overcome this problem, we define path-based centralities in higher-order aggregate networks, a recently proposed generalization of the commonly used static representation of time-stamped data. Using data on six empirical temporal networks, we show that the resulting higher-order measures better capture the true, temporal centralities of nodes. Our results demonstrate that higher-order aggregate networks constitute a powerful abstraction, with broad perspectives for the design of new, computationally efficient data mining techniques for time-stamped relational data.

[1]  Przemyslaw Kazienko,et al.  Matching Organizational Structure and Social Network Extracted from Email Communication , 2011, BIS.

[2]  Martin Rosvall,et al.  Effect of Memory on the Dynamics of Random Walks on Networks , 2014, J. Complex Networks.

[3]  Martin Rosvall,et al.  Memory in network flows and its effects on spreading dynamics and community detection , 2013, Nature Communications.

[4]  Ingo Scholtes,et al.  Betweenness Preference: Quantifying Correlations in the Topological Dynamics of Temporal Networks , 2012, Physical review letters.

[5]  Ingo Scholtes,et al.  Causality-driven slow-down and speed-up of diffusion in non-Markovian temporal networks , 2013, Nature Communications.

[6]  PentlandAlex,et al.  Reality mining: sensing complex social systems , 2006 .

[7]  Jari Saramäki,et al.  Temporal Networks , 2011, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[8]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Random walks and search in time-varying networks. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[9]  Igor M. Sokolov,et al.  Unfolding accessibility provides a macroscopic approach to temporal networks , 2012, Physical review letters.

[10]  V. Poghosyan,et al.  Numerical study of the correspondence between the dissipative and fixed-energy Abelian sandpile models. , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[11]  R. Pastor-Satorras,et al.  Activity driven modeling of time varying networks , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[12]  Amit Kumar,et al.  Connectivity and inference problems for temporal networks , 2000, STOC '00.

[13]  Petter Holme,et al.  Simulated Epidemics in an Empirical Spatiotemporal Network of 50,185 Sexual Contacts , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[14]  Petter Holme,et al.  Bursty Communication Patterns Facilitate Spreading in a Threshold-Based Epidemic Dynamics , 2012, PloS one.

[15]  Martin G. Everett,et al.  Analyzing social networks , 2013 .

[16]  Jari Saramäki,et al.  Small But Slow World: How Network Topology and Burstiness Slow Down Spreading , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[17]  Kimmo Kaski,et al.  Analytically Solvable Model of Spreading Dynamics with Non-Poissonian Processes , 2013, 1309.0701.

[18]  A. Barrat,et al.  Estimating Potential Infection Transmission Routes in Hospital Wards Using Wearable Proximity Sensors , 2013, PloS one.

[19]  Esteban Moro,et al.  Impact of human activity patterns on the dynamics of information diffusion. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[20]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Time varying networks and the weakness of strong ties , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[21]  Yuichi Yoshida,et al.  Coverage centralities for temporal networks , 2015, The European Physical Journal B.

[22]  Jari Saramäki,et al.  Path lengths, correlations, and centrality in temporal networks , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[23]  Mason A. Porter,et al.  Random Walks on Stochastic Temporal Networks , 2013, ArXiv.

[24]  Xu Tiefeng,et al.  On the enhancement of superconductivity due to Van Hove singularity , 1992 .

[25]  Ross J. Anderson,et al.  Temporal node centrality in complex networks. , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[26]  Leonard M. Freeman,et al.  A set of measures of centrality based upon betweenness , 1977 .

[27]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Reality mining: sensing complex social systems , 2006, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[28]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[29]  Anna Dornhaus,et al.  Time-Ordered Networks Reveal Limitations to Information Flow in Ant Colonies , 2011, PloS one.

[30]  Romualdo Pastor-Satorras,et al.  Random walks on temporal networks. , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[31]  Petter Holme,et al.  Modern temporal network theory: a colloquium , 2015, The European Physical Journal B.

[32]  Torsten A. Ensslin,et al.  Reply to “Comment on ‘Inference with minimal Gibbs free energy in information field theory’ ” , 2012, 1203.4480.

[33]  Vincent D. Blondel,et al.  Bursts of Vertex Activation and Epidemics in Evolving Networks , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..