Binding hot spots in the TEM1-BLIP interface in light of its modular architecture.

Proteins bind one another in aqua's solution to form tight and specific complexes. Previously we have shown that this is achieved through the modular architecture of the interaction network formed by the interface residues, where tight cooperative interactions are found within modules but not between them. Here we extend this study to cover the entire interface of TEM1 beta-lactamase and its protein inhibitor BLIP using an improved method for deriving interaction maps based on REDUCE to add hydrogen atoms and then by evaluating the interactions using modifications of the programs PROBE, NCI and PARE. An extensive mutagenesis study of the interface residues indeed showed that each module is energetically independent on other modules, and that cooperativity is found only within a module. By solving the X-ray structure of two interface mutations affecting two different modules, we demonstrated that protein-protein binding occur via the structural reorganization of the binding modules, either by a "lock and key" or an induced fit mechanism. To explain the cooperativity within a module, we performed multiple-mutant cycle analysis of cluster 2 resulting in a high-resolution energy map of this module. Mutant studies are usually done in reference to alanine, which can be regarded as a deletion of a side-chain. However, from a biological perspective, there is a major interest to understand non-Ala substitutions, as they are most common. Using X-ray crystallography and multiple-mutant cycle analysis we demonstrated the added complexity in understanding non-Ala mutations. Here, a double mutation replacing the wild-type Glu,Tyr to Tyr,Asn on TEM1 (res id 104,105) caused a major backbone structural rearrangement of BLIP, changing the composition of two modules but not of other modules within the interface. This shows the robustness of the modular approach, yet demonstrates the complexity of in silico protein design.

[1]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Conservation of polar residues as hot spots at protein interfaces , 2000, Proteins.

[2]  C. Chothia,et al.  The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  T. Palzkill,et al.  Dissecting the Protein-Protein Interface between β-Lactamase Inhibitory Protein and Class A β-Lactamases* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[4]  David M Kranz,et al.  Long-range cooperative binding effects in a T cell receptor variable domain. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  G Schreiber,et al.  Evaluation of direct and cooperative contributions towards the strength of buried hydrogen bonds and salt bridges. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[6]  O. Dym,et al.  The modular architecture of protein-protein binding interfaces. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  A. Atilgan,et al.  Direct evaluation of thermal fluctuations in proteins using a single-parameter harmonic potential. , 1997, Folding & design.

[8]  D. Koshland Application of a Theory of Enzyme Specificity to Protein Synthesis. , 1958, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  S. Jensen,et al.  Construction and analysis of ss-lactamase-inhibitory protein (BLIP) non-producer mutants of Streptomyces clavuligerus. , 2001, Microbiology.

[10]  Thomas A. Kunkel,et al.  Rapid and efficient site-specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Jack F. Kirsch,et al.  Structural and Computational Characterization of the SHV-1 β-Lactamase-β-Lactamase Inhibitor Protein Interface* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[12]  A. Bogan,et al.  Anatomy of hot spots in protein interfaces. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  J. Richardson,et al.  Asparagine and glutamine: using hydrogen atom contacts in the choice of side-chain amide orientation. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  M. Karplus,et al.  Three key residues form a critical contact network in a protein folding transition state , 2001, Nature.

[15]  Susan Jensen,et al.  Crystal structure and kinetic analysis of β-lactamase inhibitor protein-II in complex with TEM-1 β-lactamase , 2001, Nature Structural Biology.

[16]  D. Myszka Kinetic, equilibrium, and thermodynamic analysis of macromolecular interactions with BIACORE. , 2000, Methods in enzymology.

[17]  Gil Amitai,et al.  Network analysis of protein structures identifies functional residues. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  Tuval Ben Yehezkel,et al.  Variations in the unstructured C-terminal tail of interferons contribute to differential receptor binding and biological activity. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  Alan R. Fersht,et al.  The use of double mutants to detect structural changes in the active site of the tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase (Bacillus stearothermophilus) , 1984, Cell.

[20]  J. Thornton,et al.  Structural characterisation and functional significance of transient protein-protein interactions. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  André Matagne,et al.  Structural and kinetic characterization of a β-lactamase-inhibitor protein , 1994, Nature.

[22]  David E. Kim,et al.  Computational Alanine Scanning of Protein-Protein Interfaces , 2004, Science's STKE.

[23]  G Schreiber,et al.  Biophysical characterization of the interaction of the beta-lactamase TEM-1 with its protein inhibitor BLIP. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[24]  D. Baker,et al.  A simple physical model for binding energy hot spots in protein–protein complexes , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  S. Sidhu,et al.  Phage display for selection of novel binding peptides. , 2000, Methods in enzymology.

[26]  N. Pokala,et al.  Energy functions for protein design: adjustment with protein-protein complex affinities, models for the unfolded state, and negative design of solubility and specificity. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  N. Kannan,et al.  Analysis of homodimeric protein interfaces by graph-spectral methods. , 2002, Protein engineering.

[28]  M. Madan Babu,et al.  NCI: a server to identify non-canonical interactions in protein structures , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[29]  M. Zalis,et al.  Visualizing and quantifying molecular goodness-of-fit: small-probe contact dots with explicit hydrogen atoms. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[30]  E. Fischer Einfluss der Configuration auf die Wirkung der Enzyme , 1894 .

[31]  J. Homola Present and future of surface plasmon resonance biosensors , 2003, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[32]  T. Meyer,et al.  Double mutant studies identify electrostatic interactions that are important for docking cytochrome c2 onto the bacterial reaction center. , 2002, Biochemistry.

[33]  David Baker,et al.  Protein Structure Prediction Using Rosetta , 2004, Numerical Computer Methods, Part D.

[34]  M. L. Connolly Solvent-accessible surfaces of proteins and nucleic acids. , 1983, Science.

[35]  L. Swint-Kruse Using networks to identify fine structural differences between functionally distinct protein states. , 2004, Biochemistry.

[36]  Gideon Schreiber,et al.  Rational design of faster associating and tighter binding protein complexes , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[37]  T. Clackson,et al.  A hot spot of binding energy in a hormone-receptor interface , 1995, Science.

[38]  T. Kunkel Rapid and efficient site-specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  A. Horovitz,et al.  Double-mutant cycles: a powerful tool for analyzing protein structure and function. , 1996, Folding & design.

[40]  Jaime Prilusky,et al.  Automated analysis of interatomic contacts in proteins , 1999, Bioinform..

[41]  Eran Eyal,et al.  Importance of solvent accessibility and contact surfaces in modeling side‐chain conformations in proteins , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[42]  L. Serrano,et al.  Predicting changes in the stability of proteins and protein complexes: a study of more than 1000 mutations. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[43]  P. Schuck,et al.  Reliable determination of binding affinity and kinetics using surface plasmon resonance biosensors. , 1997, Current opinion in biotechnology.