Multimodal Analysis of Cohesion in Multi-party Interactions

Group cohesion is an emergent phenomenon that describes the tendency of the group members’ shared commitment to group tasks and the interpersonal attraction among them. This paper presents a multimodal analysis of group cohesion using a corpus of multi-party interactions. We utilize 16 two-minute segments annotated with cohesion from the AMI corpus. We define three layers of modalities: non-verbal social cues, dialogue acts and interruptions. The initial analysis is performed at the individual level and later, we combine the different modalities to observe their impact on perceived level of cohesion. Results indicate that occurrence of laughter and interruption are higher in high cohesive segments. We also observe that, dialogue acts and head nods did not have an impact on the level of cohesion by itself. However, when combined there was an impact on the perceived level of cohesion. Overall, the analysis shows that multimodal cues are crucial for accurate analysis of group cohesion.

[1]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Sharing Solutions: Persistence and Grounding in Multimodal Collaborative Problem Solving , 2006 .

[2]  E. Schegloff Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation , 2000, Language in Society.

[3]  K. Back Influence through social communication. , 1951, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[4]  Johanna D. Moore,et al.  Computational Modelling of Structural Priming in Dialogue , 2006, NAACL.

[5]  A. Richardsen,et al.  Cohesion as a Basic Bond in Groups , 1983 .

[6]  A. Kendon Some functions of gaze-direction in social interaction. , 1967, Acta psychologica.

[7]  SardinhaTony Berber Building Coherence and Cohesion: Task-oriented Dialogue in English and Spanish , 2006 .

[8]  Jean Carletta,et al.  The AMI Meeting Corpus: A Pre-announcement , 2005, MLMI.

[9]  Martin L. Martens,et al.  Sticking it All Together: A Critical Assessment of the Group Cohesion–Performance Literature , 2009 .

[10]  P. Ekman,et al.  What the face reveals : basic and applied studies of spontaneous expression using the facial action coding system (FACS) , 2005 .

[11]  Clotilde Pontecorvo,et al.  Are there just two people in a dyad? Dyadic configurations in multiparty family conversations , 2000 .

[12]  Hayley Hung,et al.  Estimating verbal expressions of task and social cohesion in meetings by quantifying paralinguistic mimicry , 2017, ICMI.

[13]  C. Pelachaud,et al.  Exploiting Evolutionary Algorithms to Model Nonverbal Reactions to Conversational Interruptions in User-Agent Interactions , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing.

[14]  Tony Berber Sardinha Building Coherence and Cohesion: Task-oriented Dialogue in English and Spanish , 2006, Computational Linguistics.

[15]  Peter Robinson,et al.  OpenFace: An open source facial behavior analysis toolkit , 2016, 2016 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV).

[16]  Paul S. Goodman,et al.  Understanding groups in organizations. , 1987 .

[17]  Steve W. J. Kozlowski,et al.  Measuring and Monitoring the Dynamics of Team Cohesion: Methods, Emerging Tools, and Advanced Technologies , 2015 .

[18]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Computational Models for Multiparty Turn-Taking , 2010 .

[19]  María Teresa Taboada,et al.  Building coherence and cohesion , 2004 .

[20]  S. Carless,et al.  The Measurement of Cohesion in Work Teams , 2000 .

[21]  P. Trudgill,et al.  Gender and discourse , 1998 .

[22]  M. Pickering,et al.  Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[23]  Eric Chevalley,et al.  Managing Third-Party Interruptions in Conversations: Effects of Duration and Conversational Role , 2010 .

[24]  P. Ekman,et al.  The Duchenne smile: emotional expression and brain physiology. II. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  D. Beal,et al.  Cohesion and performance in groups: a meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[26]  Catherine Pelachaud,et al.  The Effects of Interrupting Behavior on Interpersonal Attitude and Engagement in Dyadic Interactions , 2016, AAMAS.

[27]  Don H. Zimmerman,et al.  Small Insults: A Study of Interruptions in Cross-Sex Conversations between Unaquainted Persons , 1983 .

[28]  Yanxia Zhang,et al.  TeamSense , 2018, Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol..

[29]  Mattias Heldner,et al.  Pauses, gaps and overlaps in conversations , 2010, J. Phonetics.

[30]  A. Carrón,et al.  Cohesiveness in Sport Groups: Interpretations ani Considerations , 1982 .

[31]  Harry Bunt,et al.  The Semantics of Dialogue Acts , 2011, IWCS.

[32]  Catherine Pelachaud,et al.  An ECA expressing appreciations , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII).

[33]  L. Braaten Group cohesion: A new multidimensional model , 1991 .

[34]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  Nonverbal Behavior in Interpersonal Relations , 1987 .

[35]  J. Gillon,et al.  Group dynamics , 1996 .

[36]  Daniel Gatica-Perez,et al.  Estimating Cohesion in Small Groups Using Audio-Visual Nonverbal Behavior , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[37]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  Recognizing Action Units for Facial Expression Analysis , 2001, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[38]  Phillip J. Glenn Laughter in Interaction , 2003 .

[39]  A. Carrón,et al.  The Development of an Instrument to Assess Cohesion in Sport Teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire , 1985 .

[40]  L. Festinger Social pressures in informal groups : a study of human factors in housing / by Leon Festinger, Stanley Schachter and Kurt Back , 1950 .

[41]  Masafumi Nishida,et al.  Gaze and turn-taking behavior in casual conversational interactions , 2013, TIIS.

[42]  Riccardo Fusaroli,et al.  Dialog as interpersonal synergy , 2014, New Ideas in Psychology.

[43]  Albert V. Carron,et al.  The Dynamics of Group Cohesion in Sport , 1981 .

[44]  G. Beattie Interruption in conversational interaction, and its relation to the sex and status of the interactants* , 1981 .

[45]  R. Exline Explorations in the process of person perception: visual interaction in relation to competition, sex, and need for affiliation , 1963 .

[46]  H. Li Cooperative and Intrusive Interruptions in Inter- and Intracultural Dyadic Discourse , 2001 .

[47]  P. E. Mudrack,et al.  Defining Group Cohesiveness , 1989 .

[48]  Maja Pantic,et al.  Social signal processing: Survey of an emerging domain , 2009, Image Vis. Comput..

[49]  Uri Hadar,et al.  The timing of shifts of head postures during conservation , 1984 .

[50]  Gregory J. Mills Dialogue in joint activity: complementarity, convergence and conventionalization , 2014 .

[51]  Kristin Precoda,et al.  Detecting leadership and cohesion in spoken interactions , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[52]  E. Schegloff,et al.  A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation , 1974 .