Use of portable exposure meters for comparing mobile phone base station radiation in different types of areas in the cities of Basel and Amsterdam.

BACKGROUND Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) are highly variable and differ considerably within as well as between areas. Exposure assessment studies characterizing spatial and temporal variation are limited so far. Our objective was to evaluate sources of data variability and the repeatability of daily measurements using portable exposure meters (PEMs). METHODS Data were collected at 12 days between November 2010 and January 2011 with PEMs in four different types of urban areas in the cities of Basel (BSL) and Amsterdam (AMS). RESULTS Exposure from mobile phone base stations ranged from 0.30 to 0.53 V/m in downtown and business areas and in residential areas from 0.09 to 0.41 V/m. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) demonstrated that measurements from various days were highly reproducible (measurement duration of approximately 30 min) with only 0.6% of the variance of all measurements from mobile phone base station radiation being explained by the measurement day and only 0.2% by the measurement time (morning, noon, afternoon), whereas type of area (30%) and city (50%) explained most of the data variability. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that mobile monitoring of exposure from mobile phone base station radiation with PEMs is useful due to the high repeatability of mobile phone base station exposure levels, despite the high spatial variation.

[1]  Georg Neubauer,et al.  Temporal and spatial variability of personal exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields. , 2009, Environmental research.

[2]  C. Bornkessel,et al.  Determination of the general public exposure around GSM and UMTS base stations. , 2007, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[3]  G Berg-Beckhoff,et al.  Quality control for exposure assessment in epidemiological studies. , 2010, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[4]  Luc Martens,et al.  In-Situ Measurement Procedures for Temporal RF Electromagnetic Field Exposure of the General Public , 2009, Health physics.

[5]  Martin Röösli,et al.  Impact of one’s own mobile phone in stand-by mode on personal radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure , 2013, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[6]  K. Joyner,et al.  Comparative international analysis of radiofrequency exposure surveys of mobile communication radio base stations , 2012, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[7]  Elisabeth Cardis,et al.  Radiofrequency exposure in the French general population: band, time, location and activity variability. , 2009, Environment international.

[8]  T. Eikelboom,et al.  Personal radiofrequency electromagnetic field measurements in The Netherlands: exposure level and variability for everyday activities, times of day and types of area. , 2012, Environment international.

[9]  Kim Usher Indigenous higher degree research students making a difference to the Indigenous health agenda , 2010, Contemporary nurse.

[10]  Györgyi Kubinyi,et al.  Personal RF exposimetry in urban area , 2008, Ann. des Télécommunications.

[11]  M. Egger,et al.  Statistical analysis of personal radiofrequency electromagnetic field measurements with nondetects , 2008, Bioelectromagnetics.

[12]  Georg Neubauer,et al.  A prediction model for personal radio frequency electromagnetic field exposure. , 2009, The Science of the total environment.

[13]  Joe Wiart,et al.  Feasibility of future epidemiological studies on possible health effects of mobile phone base stations , 2006, Bioelectromagnetics.

[14]  H Kromhout,et al.  Geospatial modelling of electromagnetic fields from mobile phone base stations. , 2013, The Science of the total environment.

[15]  E Cardis,et al.  Variability of radiofrequency exposure across days of the week: a population-based study. , 2011, Environmental research.

[16]  G. Thuróczy,et al.  Comparison of personal radio frequency electromagnetic field exposure in different urban areas across Europe. , 2010, Environmental research.

[17]  Luc Martens,et al.  CHARACTERIZATION OF PERSONAL RF ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD EXPOSURE AND ACTUAL ABSORPTION FOR THE GENERAL PUBLIC , 2008, Health physics.

[18]  J. Bolte,et al.  Calibration and uncertainties in personal exposure measurements of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields , 2011, Bioelectromagnetics.

[19]  Georg Neubauer,et al.  Measurement setup and protocol for characterizing and testing radio frequency personal exposure meters , 2012, Bioelectromagnetics.

[20]  I. Cosic,et al.  Factors influencing uncertainty in measurement of electric fields close to the body in personal RF dosimetry. , 2010, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[21]  Luc Martens,et al.  Conduct of a personal radiofrequency electromagnetic field measurement study: proposed study protocol , 2010, Environmental health : a global access science source.