Processing Mechanisms in Hearing-Impaired Listeners: Evidence from Reaction Times and Sentence Interpretation
暂无分享,去创建一个
Thomas Brand | Esther Ruigendijk | Verena Uslar | Rebecca Carroll | Verena Nicole Uslar | T. Brand | E. Ruigendijk | Rebecca Carroll
[1] Arthur Wingfield,et al. Effects of adult aging and hearing loss on comprehension of rapid speech varying in syntactic complexity. , 2006, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[2] Esther Janse,et al. Processing of fast speech by elderly listeners. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[3] Tammo Houtgast,et al. Auditory and nonauditory factors affecting speech reception in noise by older listeners. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[4] A. Zekveld,et al. Cognitive Load During Speech Perception in Noise: The Influence of Age, Hearing Loss, and Cognition on the Pupil Response , 2011, Ear and hearing.
[5] S. Soli,et al. Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[6] Josef Bayer,et al. Case and Linking in Language Comprehension: Evidence from German , 2006 .
[7] P. Rabbitt. Mild hearing loss can cause apparent memory failures which increase with age and reduce with IQ. , 1990, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.
[8] P. Rabbitt,et al. Channel-Capacity, Intelligibility and Immediate Memory , 1968, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[9] Angela D. Friederici,et al. Syntactic parsing and working memory: The effects of syntactic complexity, reading span, and concurrent load , 2001 .
[10] Arthur Wingfield,et al. Hearing Loss and Perceptual Effort: Downstream Effects on Older Adults’ Memory for Speech , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[11] Esther Ruigendijk,et al. The Effects of Syntactic Complexity on Processing Sentences in Noise , 2013, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[12] Elisabeth Dévière,et al. Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R , 2009 .
[13] F. Donders,et al. Over de snelheid van psychische Processen , 1868 .
[14] Jerker Rönnberg,et al. Gated Auditory Speech Perception in Elderly Hearing Aid Users and Elderly Normal-Hearing Individuals: Effects of Hearing Impairment and Cognitive Capacity , 2014, Trends in hearing.
[15] B. Hornsby. The Effects of Hearing Aid Use on Listening Effort and Mental Fatigue Associated With Sustained Speech Processing Demands , 2013, Ear and hearing.
[16] R. Harald Baayen,et al. The Myth of Cognitive Decline: Non-Linear Dynamics of Lifelong Learning , 2014, Top. Cogn. Sci..
[17] J M Festen,et al. Assessing aspects of auditory handicap by means of pupil dilatation. , 1997, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.
[18] Ewen N. MacDonald,et al. Word Recognition for Temporally and Spectrally Distorted Materials: The Effects of Age and Hearing Loss , 2012, Ear and hearing.
[19] Lyn Frazier,et al. Sentence processing: A tutorial review. , 1987 .
[20] Birger Kollmeier,et al. Development and evaluation of a linguistically and audiologically controlled sentence intelligibility test. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[21] A. Wingfield,et al. Cognitive aging and hearing acuity: modeling spoken language comprehension , 2015, Front. Psychol..
[22] T. Lunner,et al. Cognition counts: A working memory system for ease of language understanding (ELU) , 2008, International journal of audiology.
[23] Birger Kollmeier,et al. How Hearing Impairment Affects Sentence Comprehension: Using Eye Fixations to Investigate the Duration of Speech Processing , 2015, Trends in hearing.
[24] S Gatehouse,et al. Response times to speech stimuli as measures of benefit from amplification. , 1990, British journal of audiology.
[25] L. Humes,et al. Reconstructing Wholes From Parts: Effects of Modality, Age, and Hearing Loss on Word Recognition , 2013, Ear and hearing.
[26] A. Wingfield,et al. Neural processing during older adults' comprehension of spoken sentences: age differences in resource allocation and connectivity. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.
[27] H. Dillon,et al. The National Acoustic Laboratories' (NAL) New Procedure for Selecting the Gain and Frequency Response of a Hearing Aid , 1986, Ear and hearing.
[28] Erin M Picou,et al. The Effect of Changing the Secondary Task in Dual-Task Paradigms for Measuring Listening Effort , 2014, Ear and hearing.
[29] James L. McClelland,et al. The TRACE model of speech perception , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.
[30] Birger Kollmeier,et al. Efficient adaptive procedures for threshold and concurrent slope estimates for psychophysics and speech intelligibility tests. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[31] Erin M Picou,et al. How Hearing Aids, Background Noise, and Visual Cues Influence Objective Listening Effort , 2013, Ear and hearing.
[32] A. Stewart,et al. Listening effort and fatigue: What exactly are we measuring? A British Society of Audiology Cognition in Hearing Special Interest Group ‘white paper’ , 2014, International journal of audiology.
[33] D. Downs. Effects of hearing and use on speech discrimination and listening effort. , 1982, Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders.
[34] H. Akaike. A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .
[35] Sridhar Kalluri,et al. Objective measures of listening effort: effects of background noise and noise reduction. , 2009, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[36] A. Wingfield,et al. Cognitive supports and cognitive constraints on comprehension of spoken language. , 2007, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[37] Douglas L. Hintzman,et al. "Schema Abstraction" in a Multiple-Trace Memory Model , 1986 .
[38] Arthur Wingfield,et al. Response latencies in auditory sentence comprehension: effects of linguistic versus perceptual challenge. , 2010, Psychology and aging.
[39] A. Jensen,et al. The theory of intelligence and its measurement , 2011 .
[40] A. Welford. Choice reaction time: Basic concepts , 1980 .
[41] A. Wingfield,et al. Word Recognition Within a Linguistic Context: Effects of Age, Hearing Acuity, Verbal Ability, and Cognitive Function , 2012, Ear and hearing.
[42] IEEE Recommended Practice for Speech Quality Measurements , 1969, IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics.
[43] Amos Paran. Bottom-up and Top-down processing , 1997 .
[44] Paul Miller,et al. Effects of degraded sensory input on memory for speech: Behavioral data and a test of biologically constrained computational models , 2010, Brain Research.
[45] R. Baayen,et al. Analyzing Reaction Times , 2010 .
[46] T. Lunner,et al. The Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) model: theoretical, empirical, and clinical advances , 2013, Front. Syst. Neurosci..
[47] Anna Warzybok,et al. The multilingual matrix test: Principles, applications, and comparison across languages: A review , 2015, International journal of audiology.
[48] T. Lunner,et al. Working memory capacity may influence perceived effort during aided speech recognition in noise. , 2012, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[49] A. Zekveld,et al. The influence of informational masking on speech perception and pupil response in adults with hearing impairment. , 2014, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[50] J Bamford,et al. The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children. , 1979, British journal of audiology.
[51] Brigitte Röder,et al. Parsing of Sentences in a Language with Varying Word Order: Word-by-Word Variations of Processing Demands Are Revealed by Event-Related Brain Potentials ☆ ☆☆ ★ , 1998 .
[52] M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller,et al. Effects of aging on auditory processing of speech , 2003, International journal of audiology.
[53] Mark Huckvale,et al. Effect of noise reduction on reaction time to speech in noise , 2009, INTERSPEECH.
[54] Executive Officer,et al. National Acoustic Laboratories , 2005 .