The performance of active spectral reflectance sensors as influenced by measuring distance, device temperature and light intensity

Ambient conditions and sensor-plant distances may affect active sensors' performance.Effects of changes in light and temperature on three active sensors were investigated.Active sensors' performance is hardly affected by changes in light intensity.Distance between the sensor and the target surface needs to be considered.Varying device temperature should be taken into account. Spectral remote sensing is widely used for land-use management, agriculture, and crop management. Spectral sensors are most frequently adopted for site-specific fertiliser applications and, increasingly, for precision phenotyping. With the use of active sensors in the field, it is inevitable that they will be used under varying ambient conditions and with varying crop distances, but it remains unclear how these factors affect the active sensors' performance. This study was conducted to determine whether changes in light intensity, ambient temperature, and measuring distance influence the accuracy of the spectral reading from three different active sensors (NTech GreenSeeker RT100, Holland Scientific CropCircle ACS 470, YARA N-Sensor ALS). The distance between sensor and target surface was the major factor to be considered, depending on the sensor type. Optimised measuring distances to crop canopies that enable stable sensor outputs were determined from 10 to 200cm sensor-object distance (GreenSeeker: 70-140cm, CropCircle: 30-200cm and ALS N-Sensor: 50-200cm) and compared to manufacturer's recommendations for correct use of the sensors. In addition, the device temperature had variable results depending on sensor and spectral index. In contrast, varying light conditions, including nocturnal usage, hardly affected the performance of the sensors in agreement with the manufacturers' claims that sensor performance is independent of ambient light conditions. Given the preliminary nature of these investigations, further research into optimising the sensor performance with respect to the measuring distance and the device's temperature are needed to improve the application of this technology under field conditions.

[1]  M. Nunez,et al.  Global radiation within corn , 1977 .

[2]  Nicolas Tremblay,et al.  A comparison of crop data measured by two commercial sensors for variable-rate nitrogen application , 2009, Precision Agriculture.

[3]  John E. Sawyer,et al.  Using Active Canopy Sensors to Quantify Corn Nitrogen Stress and Nitrogen Application Rate , 2010 .

[4]  Urs Schmidhalter,et al.  Influence of ambient light and temperature on laser-induced chlorophyll fluorescence measurements , 2010 .

[5]  J. P. Molin,et al.  Active crop sensor to detect variability of nitrogen supply and biomass on sugarcane fields , 2011, Precision Agriculture.

[6]  Bram Govaerts,et al.  Evaluating spatial within plot crop variability for different management practices with an optical sensor? , 2007, Plant and Soil.

[7]  Kenneth A. Sudduth,et al.  Sensor‐Based Nitrogen Applications Out‐Performed Producer‐Chosen Rates for Corn in On‐Farm Demonstrations , 2011 .

[8]  David C. Nielsen,et al.  Evaluating the Crop Water Stress Index and its correlation with latent heat and CO2 fluxes over winter wheat and maize in the North China plain , 2010 .

[9]  Bodo Mistele,et al.  Assessing the vertical footprint of reflectance measurements to characterize nitrogen uptake and biomass distribution in maize canopies , 2012 .

[10]  G. Fitzgerald.  Characterizing vegetation indices derived from active and passive sensors , 2010 .

[11]  David W. Lamb,et al.  Radiometry of Proximal Active Optical Sensors (AOS) for Agricultural Sensing , 2012, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[12]  B. Mistele,et al.  Comparison of active and passive spectral sensors in discriminating biomass parameters and nitrogen status in wheat cultivars , 2011 .

[13]  U. Schmidhalter.  Sensing soil and plant properties by non-destructive measurements , 2005 .

[14]  D. Beegle,et al.  Developing Nitrogen Fertilizer Recommendations for Corn Using an Active Sensor , 2008 .

[15]  David Michael Glenn,et al.  Characteristics of Active Spectral Sensor for Plant Sensing , 2012 .

[16]  A. Gitelson,et al.  Application of Spectral Remote Sensing for Agronomic Decisions , 2008 .

[17]  Urs Schmidhalter,et al.  Nitrogen status and biomass determination of oilseed rape by laser-induced chlorophyll fluorescence , 2009 .

[18]  Viacheslav I. Adamchuk,et al.  Optimization of crop canopy sensor placement for measuring nitrogen status in corn. , 2009 .

[19]  B. Govaerts,et al.  Using NDVI and soil quality analysis to assess influence of agronomic management on within-plot spatial variability and factors limiting production , 2008, Plant and Soil.

[20]  A. H. Mayfield,et al.  Grain yield and protein responses in wheat using the N-Sensor for variable rate N application , 2009 .

[21]  Fernando Solari,et al.  DEVELOPING A CROP BASED STRATEGY FOR ON-THE-GO NITROGEN MANAGEMENT IN IRRIGATED CORNFIELDS , 2006 .

[22]  Johnny Park,et al.  Active Spectral Sensor Evaluation under Varying Conditions , 2010 .