Effect of the sun on visible clinical signs of aging in Caucasian skin

Objectives Aging signs can be classified into four main categories: wrinkles/texture, lack of firmness of cutaneous tissues (ptosis), vascular disorders, and pigmentation heterogeneities. During a lifetime, skin will change in appearance and structure not only because of chronological and intrinsic processes but also due to several external factors such as gravity, sun and ultraviolet exposure, and high levels of pollution; or lifestyle factors that have important and obvious effects on skin aging, such as diet, tobacco, illness, or stress. The effect of these external factors leads to progressive degradations of tegument that appear with different kinetics. The aim of this study was to clinically quantify the effect of sun exposure on facial aging in terms of the appearance of new specific signs or in terms of increasing the classical signs of aging. Materials and methods This study was carried out on 298 Caucasian women from 30 years to 78 years old. The participants were divided into two groups according to their sun exposure history: 157 women were characterized as sun-seeking, and the other 141 were classified as sun-phobic. This division was made possible by dermatologist grading of heliodermal status on the basis of several observations of classic criteria: wrinkles, sagging, pigmentation heterogeneities, vascular disorders, elastosis, and so on. This work was an opportunity to complete clinical photographic tools by adding in our portfolio new scales for signs observed in the two groups. Thus, 22 clinical parameters were investigated by a panel of twelve trained experts to characterize each woman’s face regarding standardized photographic scales, and thus describe the aging process. Results By calculating statistical correlations between the four clinical clusters (wrinkles/texture, ptosis, vascular disorders, and pigmentation disorders), and real age and apparent age on the one hand and heliodermal status on the other hand, we identified a link between each clinical cluster and aging and the photoaging process. By comparing evaluations of clinical signs between the two groups for each 10-year cluster, we demonstrated that whatever the age, a prevalence of pigmentation disorders for the sun-seeking group (ie, pigmentation) is strongly linked to ultraviolet (UV) exposure. Meanwhile, clinical signs of ptosis are linked more to chronological aging and do not present differences between the two groups, nor, therefore, photoaging. Wrinkles and texture are affected by the two aging processes. Finally, clinical signs of vascular disorders present no evolution with age. Conclusion Clinical signs of aging are essentially influenced by extrinsic factors, especially sun exposure. Indeed UV exposure seems to be responsible for 80% of visible facial aging signs.

[1]  J. Uitto,et al.  Intrinsic aging vs. photoaging: a comparative histopathological, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural study of skin , 2002, Experimental dermatology.

[2]  B. Gilchrest,et al.  Skin aging and photoaging: an overview. , 1989, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[3]  C. Griffiths,et al.  The clinical identification and quantification of photodamage , 1992, The British journal of dermatology.

[4]  L. Baumann,et al.  Skin ageing and its treatment , 2007, The Journal of pathology.

[5]  R. Lavker,et al.  The anatomy and pathogenesis of wrinkles , 1985, The British journal of dermatology.

[6]  Pulsed Carbon Dioxide Laser Resurfacing of Photoaged Facial Skin , 1996 .

[7]  J. Uitto Understanding premature skin aging. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  A. Young,et al.  Novel Aspects of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Aging of Human Skin: Beneficial Effects of Soy Extract¶ , 2005, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[9]  P. Elsner,et al.  Intrinsic and extrinsic factors in skin ageing: a review , 2008, International journal of cosmetic science.

[10]  R. Glogau Aesthetic and anatomic analysis of the aging skin. , 1996, Seminars in cutaneous medicine and surgery.

[11]  G F Gerberick,et al.  Cumulative effects from repeated exposures to suberythemal doses of UVB and UVA in human skin. , 1995, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[12]  M. Alexiades-Armenakas Rhytides, laxity, and photoaging treated with a combination of radiofrequency, diode laser, and pulsed light and assessed with a comprehensive grading scale. , 2006, Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD.

[13]  T. Fitzpatrick The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. , 1988, Archives of dermatology.

[14]  H. A. David,et al.  The Method of Paired Comparisons (2nd ed.). , 1989 .

[15]  M. Yaar,et al.  Photoageing: mechanism, prevention and therapy , 2007, The British journal of dermatology.

[16]  T. Fitzpatrick The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. , 1988, Archives of Dermatology.

[17]  A K Langton,et al.  Review Article: A new wrinkle on old skin: the role of elastic fibres in skin ageing , 2010, International journal of cosmetic science.

[18]  P. Giacomoni,et al.  Skin Aging: A Generalization of the Micro-inflammatory Hypothesis , 2010 .

[19]  Maximo C. Gacula,et al.  Statistical Methods in Food and Consumer Research , 1985 .

[20]  R. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Pulsed carbon dioxide laser resurfacing of photo-aged facial skin. , 1996, Archives of dermatology.

[21]  P. Moran On the method of paired comparisons. , 1947, Biometrika.