Do we hear size or sound? Balls dropped on plates

The aim of this study is to examine whether it is possible to recover directly the size of an object from the sound of an impact. Specifically, the study is designed to investigate whether listeners can tell the size of a ball from the sound when it is dropped on plates of different diameters (on one, two, or three plates in Experiments 1, 2, and 3, respectively). In this paradigm, most of the sound produced is from the plate rather than the ball. Listeners were told neither how many different balls or plates were used nor the materials of the balls and plates. Although listeners provided reasonable ball size estimates, their judgments were influenced by the size of the plate: Balls were judged to be larger when dropped on larger plates. Moreover, listeners were generally unable to recognize either ball and plate materials or the number of plates used in Experiments 2 and 3. Finally, various acoustic properties of the sounds are shown to be correlated with listeners’ judgments.

[1]  G. J. Rich,et al.  A preliminary study of tonal volume. , 1916 .

[2]  Edwin G. Boring,et al.  Auditory Theory with Special Reference to Intensity, Volume, and Localization , 1926 .

[3]  P. Morse Vibration and Sound , 1949, Nature.

[4]  J. W. Gordon,et al.  Perceptual effects of spectral modifications on musical timbres , 1978 .

[5]  D R Perrott,et al.  The expanding-image effect: the concept on tonal volume revisited. , 1980, The Journal of auditory research.

[6]  W H Warren,et al.  Auditory perception of breaking and bouncing events: a case study in ecological acoustics. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  D. Norman,et al.  Everyday listening and auditory icons , 1988 .

[8]  C A Fowler,et al.  Sound-producing sources as objects of perception: rate normalization and nonspeech perception. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  D. Freed,et al.  Auditory correlates of perceived mallet hardness for a set of recorded percussive sound events. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  C A Fowler,et al.  Auditory perception is not special: we see the world, we feel the world, we hear the world. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Robert J. Logan,et al.  Perception of acoustic source characteristics: walking sounds. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  William W. Gaver What in the World Do We Hear? An Ecological Approach to Auditory Event Perception , 1993 .

[13]  William W. Gaver How Do We Hear in the World?: Explorations in Ecological Acoustics , 1993 .

[14]  Stephen McAdams,et al.  The representation of auditory source characteristics: Simple geometric form , 1997 .

[15]  R. Lutfi,et al.  Auditory discrimination of material changes in a struck-clamped bar. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  C. Carello,et al.  Perception of Object Length by Sound , 1998 .

[17]  Dinesh K. Pai,et al.  Perception of Material from Contact Sounds , 2000, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[18]  R A Lutfi,et al.  Auditory detection of hollowness. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Dottorato Di Ricerca,et al.  COMPUTATIONAL ISSUES IN PHYSICALLY-BASED SOUND MODELS , 2001 .

[20]  S. McAdams,et al.  The psychomechanics of simulated sound sources: material properties of impacted bars. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Brian Gygi,et al.  Spectral-temporal factors in the identification of environmental sounds. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.