Fast bias field reduction by localized Lloyd-Max quantization

Bias field reduction is a common problem in medical imaging. A bias field usually manifests itself as a smooth intensity variation across the image. The resulting image inhomogeneity is a severe problem for posterior image processing and analysis techniques such as registration or segmentation. In this paper, we present a fast debiasing technique based on localized Lloyd-Max quantization. Thereby, the local bias is modelled as a multiplicative field and is assumed to be slowly varying. The method is based on the assumption that the local, undegraded histogram is characterized by a limited number of gray values. The goal is then to find the discrete intensity values such that spreading those values according to the local bias field reproduces the global histogram as good as possible. We show that our method is capable of efficiently reducing (even strong) bias fields in 3D volumes in only a few seconds.

[1]  Lucas J. van Vliet,et al.  The digital signal processing handbook , 1998 .

[2]  Bostjan Likar,et al.  A Review of Methods for Correction of Intensity Inhomogeneity in MRI , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  Koenraad Van Leemput,et al.  Automated model-based bias field correction of MR images of the brain , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  Jerry L. Prince,et al.  Adaptive fuzzy c-means algorithm for image segmentation in the presence of intensity inhomogeneities , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[5]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  BrainWeb: Online Interface to a 3D MRI Simulated Brain Database , 1997 .

[6]  Manuel Desco,et al.  Method for bias field correction of brain T1‐weighted magnetic resonance images minimizing segmentation error , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[7]  Benoit M. Dawant,et al.  Correction of intensity variations in MR images for computer-aided tissue classification , 1993, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[8]  José V. Manjón,et al.  A nonparametric MRI inhomogeneity correction method , 2007, Medical Image Anal..

[9]  A. Alavi,et al.  Analysis of brain and cerebrospinal fluid volumes with MR imaging. Part I. Methods, reliability, and validation. , 1991, Radiology.

[10]  M J Yaffe,et al.  Field nonuniformity correction for quantitative analysis of digitized mammograms. , 2001, Medical physics.

[11]  Jan Sijbers,et al.  Maximum-likelihood estimation of Rician distribution parameters , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  G. Bruce Pike,et al.  Standing-wave and RF penetration artifacts caused by elliptic geometry: an electrodynamic analysis of MRI , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  Gérard Gimenez,et al.  MRI intensity nonuniformity correction using simultaneously spatial and gray-level histogram information , 2007, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[14]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  Aly A. Farag,et al.  A modified fuzzy c-means algorithm for bias field estimation and segmentation of MRI data , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  T. W. Ridler,et al.  Picture thresholding using an iterative selection method. , 1978 .

[17]  C. G. Broyden The Convergence of a Class of Double-rank Minimization Algorithms 2. The New Algorithm , 1970 .

[18]  S. Arridge,et al.  Sources of intensity nonuniformity in spin echo images at 1.5 T , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.