Optimization of clinical protocols for contrast enhanced breast imaging

Contrast enhanced (CE) breast imaging has been proposed as a method to increase the sensitivity and specificity of breast cancer detection. Because malignant lesions often exhibit angiogenesis, the uptake of radio-opaque contrast agents (e.g. iodine) results in increased attenuation compared to the background tissue. Both planar CE digital mammography (CE-DM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (CE-DBT) have been proposed, using temporal or dual energy (DE) subtraction to remove tissue backgrounds. In the current study, we apply a cascaded linear systems model approach to analyze CE techniques with DE subtraction for designing a diagnostic imaging study, including the effects of contrast dynamics. We apply the model for both CE-DM and CE-DBT to calculate the ideal observer signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for the detection of I contrast objects of different sizes and concentrations. The calculation of this figure-of-merit (FOM) was be used to optimize CE clinical imaging protocols.

[1]  A E Burgess,et al.  The Rose model, revisited. , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[2]  Wei Zhao,et al.  Three-dimensional linear system analysis for breast tomosynthesis. , 2008, Medical physics.

[3]  Wei Zhao,et al.  A 3D linear system model for the optimization of dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis , 2011, Medical Imaging.

[4]  Bo Zhao,et al.  Image artifacts in digital breast tomosynthesis: investigation of the effects of system geometry and reconstruction parameters using a linear system approach. , 2008, Medical physics.

[5]  Wei Zhao,et al.  Experimental quantification of lesion detectability in contrast enhanced dual energy digital breast tomosynthesis , 2012, Medical Imaging.

[6]  Bo Zhao,et al.  Optimization of detector operation and imaging geometry for breast tomosynthesis , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[7]  Erik Fredenberg,et al.  Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography with a photon-counting detector. , 2010, Medical physics.

[8]  Ann-Katherine Carton,et al.  Quantification for contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[9]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Scatter radiation in digital tomosynthesis of the breast. , 2007, Medical physics.

[10]  Ann-Katherine Carton,et al.  Optimization of a Dual-Energy Contrast-Enhanced Technique for a Photon Counting Digital Breast Tomosynthesis System , 2008, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[11]  Felix Diekmann,et al.  Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results of a multireader, multicase study , 2012, Breast Cancer Research.

[12]  Thomas Mertelmeier,et al.  Experimental validation of a three-dimensional linear system model for breast tomosynthesis. , 2008, Medical physics.

[13]  A. Burgess,et al.  Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise. , 2001, Medical physics.

[14]  J A Rowlands,et al.  Effects of characteristic x rays on the noise power spectra and detective quantum efficiency of photoconductive x-ray detectors. , 2001, Medical physics.

[15]  William Vennart,et al.  ICRU Report 54: Medical imaging—the assessment of image quality: ISBN 0-913394-53-X. April 1996, Maryland, U.S.A. , 1997 .

[16]  Ann-Katherine Carton,et al.  Validation of MTF measurement for digital mammography quality control. , 2005, Medical physics.

[17]  J H Siewerdsen,et al.  Anatomical background and generalized detectability in tomosynthesis and cone-beam CT. , 2010, Medical physics.

[18]  J H Siewerdsen,et al.  Optimization of dual-energy imaging systems using generalized NEQ and imaging task. , 2006, Medical physics.

[19]  Wei Zhao,et al.  Imaging performance of amorphous selenium based flat-panel detectors for digital mammography: characterization of a small area prototype detector. , 2003, Medical physics.

[20]  Felix Diekmann,et al.  Evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography. , 2011, European journal of radiology.

[21]  Grace J Gang,et al.  Analysis of Fourier-domain task-based detectability index in tomosynthesis and cone-beam CT in relation to human observer performance. , 2011, Medical physics.

[22]  Wei Zhao,et al.  The effect of angular dose distribution on the detection of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis. , 2011, Medical physics.

[23]  K. Hoffmann,et al.  Generalizing the MTF and DQE to include x-ray scatter and focal spot unsharpness: application to a new microangiographic system. , 2005, Medical physics.

[24]  Arthur E. Burgess,et al.  Mammographic structure: data preparation and spatial statistics analysis , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[25]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Conditioning data for calculation of the modulation transfer function. , 2003, Medical physics.

[26]  J A Rowlands,et al.  Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: theoretical analysis of detective quantum efficiency. , 1997, Medical physics.

[27]  Ann-Katherine Carton,et al.  Dual-energy subtraction for contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[28]  Jeffrey H Siewerdsen,et al.  Cascaded systems analysis of noise reduction algorithms in dual-energy imaging. , 2008, Medical physics.

[29]  Bo Zhao,et al.  Imaging performance of an amorphous selenium digital mammography detector in a breast tomosynthesis system. , 2008, Medical physics.

[30]  John M Lewin,et al.  Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital subtraction mammography: feasibility. , 2003, Radiology.

[31]  Wei Zhao,et al.  Breast Structural Noise in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Its Dependence on Reconstruction Methods , 2010, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[32]  Serge Muller,et al.  Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis of breast carcinoma using contrast-enhanced digital mammography. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.