Hybrid spectrum sharing with imperfect sensing in fading channels

This paper considers the hybrid spectrum sharing paradigm where a cognitive radio system first performs spectrum sensing to identify primary users' (PU) status (idle/busy) and then adapts its transmit power according to sensing outcomes. To maximize ergodic throughput in fading environments, joint sensing and power allocation has to be considered. However, existing studies determine the optimal sensing time based on instantaneous channel state information (CSI) at each time slot, which imposes a stringent requirement in practice. In this paper, we obtained a statistical CSI-based optimal sensing time by exploring the ergodic rates of both overlay and underlay access in Rayleigh fading environments. Simulation results validate the derived analytic expressions, showing that significantly higher maximum throughput can be achieved by hybrid access compared with conventional overlay access.

[1]  Sonia Aïssa,et al.  Capacity and power allocation for spectrum-sharing communications in fading channels , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[2]  Halim Yanikomeroglu,et al.  Access Strategies for Spectrum Sharing in Fading Environment: Overlay, Underlay, and Mixed , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[3]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  NeXt generation/dynamic spectrum access/cognitive radio wireless networks: A survey , 2006, Comput. Networks.

[4]  T. Charles Clancy,et al.  Achievable Capacity Under the Interference Temperature Model , 2007, IEEE INFOCOM 2007 - 26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[5]  D. Zwillinger,et al.  Standard Mathematical Tables and Formulae , 1997, The Mathematical Gazette.

[6]  Ying-Chang Liang,et al.  Sensing-Based Spectrum Sharing in Cognitive Radio Networks , 2009, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol..

[7]  Arumugam Nallanathan,et al.  Optimal Sensing Time and Power Allocation in Multiband Cognitive Radio Networks , 2010 .

[8]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Cognitive radio: brain-empowered wireless communications , 2005, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[9]  James C. Bezdek,et al.  Some Notes on Alternating Optimization , 2002, AFSS.

[10]  Athanasios V. Vasilakos,et al.  Novel overlay/underlay cognitive radio waveforms using SD-SMSE framework to enhance spectrum efficiency- part i: theoretical framework and analysis in AWGN channel , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[11]  Mohamed-Slim Alouini,et al.  On the Energy Detection of Unknown Signals Over Fading Channels , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[12]  Christian Ibars,et al.  Distributed Cooperation in Cognitive Radio Networks: Overlay Versus Underlay Paradigm , 2009, VTC Spring 2009 - IEEE 69th Vehicular Technology Conference.

[13]  Joseph Mitola,et al.  Cognitive radio: making software radios more personal , 1999, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[14]  Yonghong Zeng,et al.  Sensing-Throughput Tradeoff for Cognitive Radio Networks , 2008, IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun..

[15]  Gokhan Memik,et al.  Energy Detection Using Estimated Noise Variance for Spectrum Sensing in Cognitive Radio Networks , 2008, 2008 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference.

[16]  A. Anpalagan,et al.  Throughput Analysis of Opportunistic Access Strategies in Hybrid Underlay—Overlay Cognitive Radio Networks , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[17]  Amir Ghasemi,et al.  Fundamental limits of spectrum-sharing in fading environments , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.