Neuron-Compressed Deep Neural Network and Its Application in Industrial Anomaly Detection

Data modeling and online monitoring are two critical stages for data-driven anomaly detection. Regarding data modeling, deep neural networks (DNNs) can learn good decision boundaries to separate the anomaly and normal regions, due to their flexible model structures and excellent fitting ability. However, DNNs, using nonlinear activations with specific boundaries, may indirectly cause a limited anomaly detection margin, especially when there are samples far from centroids. Moreover, an anomaly detection model with a narrow detection margin is deemed insensitive to general faults. An anomaly detection model with a tight detection margin will suffer a severe performance degradation. To mitigate the intrinsic drawbacks of DNNs, we develop a new regularizer based on the maximum likelihood of complete data (i.e., observations and latent variables). The regularizer is neuronwise and mathematically acts as compressing neurons, dragging the marginal points into the centroids. Combining the regularizer with the encoding–decoding structure networks, we perform an industrial case study to verify the superiority of the proposed method.

[1]  Qiu Tang,et al.  Industrial process fault detection based on deep highly-sensitive feature capture , 2021 .

[2]  Jianping Wu,et al.  A modified neighborhood preserving embedding-based incipient fault detection with applications to small-scale cyber-physical systems. , 2020, ISA transactions.

[3]  Zhiqiang Ge,et al.  Gated Stacked Target-Related Autoencoder: A Novel Deep Feature Extraction and Layerwise Ensemble Method for Industrial Soft Sensor Application , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics.

[4]  Jianbo Yu,et al.  Manifold regularized stacked autoencoders-based feature learning for fault detection in industrial processes , 2020 .

[5]  Jinsong Zhao,et al.  A new unsupervised data mining method based on the stacked autoencoder for chemical process fault diagnosis , 2020, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[6]  Furong Gao,et al.  Data-Driven Two-Dimensional Deep Correlated Representation Learning for Nonlinear Batch Process Monitoring , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[7]  Weihua Gui,et al.  A comprehensive hybrid first principles/machine learning modeling framework for complex industrial processes , 2020 .

[8]  Xuefeng Yan,et al.  Whole Process Monitoring Based on Unstable Neuron Output Information in Hidden Layers of Deep Belief Network , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics.

[9]  Ruomu Tan,et al.  Nonstationary Discrete Convolution Kernel for Multimodal Process Monitoring , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems.

[10]  Seoung Bum Kim,et al.  Process monitoring using variational autoencoder for high-dimensional nonlinear processes , 2019, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[11]  James R. Ottewill,et al.  A heterogeneous benchmark dataset for data analytics: Multiphase flow facility case study , 2019, Journal of Process Control.

[12]  Junghui Chen,et al.  Concurrent Fault Detection and Anomaly Location in Closed-Loop Dynamic Systems With Measured Disturbances , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[13]  Junghui Chen,et al.  Systematic Development of a New Variational Autoencoder Model Based on Uncertain Data for Monitoring Nonlinear Processes , 2019, IEEE Access.

[14]  Il-Chul Moon,et al.  Dirichlet Variational Autoencoder , 2019, Pattern Recognit..

[15]  Bin Liu,et al.  A Mixture of Variational Canonical Correlation Analysis for Nonlinear and Quality-Relevant Process Monitoring , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[16]  Naixue Xiong,et al.  Learning Sparse Representation With Variational Auto-Encoder for Anomaly Detection , 2018, IEEE Access.

[17]  Yupu Yang,et al.  Automated feature learning for nonlinear process monitoring – An approach using stacked denoising autoencoder and k-nearest neighbor rule , 2018 .

[18]  Yi Cao,et al.  Canonical Variate Dissimilarity Analysis for Process Incipient Fault Detection , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[19]  Zhiqiang Ge,et al.  Review on data-driven modeling and monitoring for plant-wide industrial processes , 2017 .

[20]  Chunhui Zhao,et al.  Stationarity test and Bayesian monitoring strategy for fault detection in nonlinear multimode processes , 2017 .

[21]  Mahmoud Taibi,et al.  Using multi-scale entropy and principal component analysis to monitor gears degradation via the motor current signature analysis , 2017 .

[22]  Cristobal Ruiz-Carcel,et al.  Statistical process monitoring of a multiphase flow facility , 2015 .

[23]  Alexander J. Smola,et al.  Efficient mini-batch training for stochastic optimization , 2014, KDD.

[24]  Steven X. Ding,et al.  A Review on Basic Data-Driven Approaches for Industrial Process Monitoring , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[25]  Gang Rong,et al.  Nonlinear process monitoring based on maximum variance unfolding projections , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[26]  M. Hazelton,et al.  Cross‐validation Bandwidth Matrices for Multivariate Kernel Density Estimation , 2005 .

[27]  Abdel Razzaq Mugdadi,et al.  A bandwidth selection for kernel density estimation of functions of random variables , 2004, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[28]  S. Joe Qin,et al.  Statistical process monitoring: basics and beyond , 2003 .

[29]  Majdi Mansouri,et al.  Online reduced kernel principal component analysis for process monitoring , 2018 .

[30]  Ruomu Tan,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamic Process Monitoring: The Case Study of a Multiphase Flow Facility , 2017 .

[31]  Guigang Zhang,et al.  Deep Learning , 2016, Int. J. Semantic Comput..