Millennial Learners and Net-Savvy Teens? Examining Internet Use among Low-Income Students

Abstract This paper discusses access and use of information and communication technologies among urban high school students from low-income families, a topic of great interest to teacher educators, educational policymakers, and others concerned with digital literacy instruction. Recent reports from national digital learning initiatives have portrayed today’s teens as digital natives—youth who are constantly online, perceive themselves as Internet-savvy, and prefer technology-enhanced learning experiences. However, this portrait may not be true for all learners. This study investigated trends in Internet use among students from low-income families compared to national trends. In the spring of 2007, students from low-income families responded to a survey assessing their access to the Internet, frequency and type of use, and capacity to use the Internet. The researchers also conducted focus groups with students. In this paper, we discuss findings and implications for teachers seeking to understand similar students' Internet access, use, and capacity and suggest implications for digital literacy instruction, technology policy, and teacher education.

[1]  Laurie Lewis,et al.  Internet Access in U.S. Public Schools and Classrooms: 1994-2005. Highlights. NCES 2007-020. , 2006 .

[2]  Larry Cuban Oversold and Underused , 2001 .

[3]  Jing Lei Digital Natives As Preservice Teachers , 2009 .

[4]  Colin Lankshear,et al.  New Literacies: Everyday Practices and Classroom Learning , 2006 .

[5]  Guy Merchant New Literacies: Everyday Practices and Classroom Learning (2nd edn.) by Colin Lankshear and Michele Knobel , 2007 .

[6]  Stephen G. Sheldon,et al.  Conditions for Classroom Technology Innovations , 2002, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[7]  Gail Salaway,et al.  The ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 2008 , 2007 .

[8]  Susan P. Choy,et al.  Students Whose Parents Did Not Go to College: Postsecondary Access, Persistence, and Attainment. Findings from the Condition of Education, 2001. , 2001 .

[9]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[10]  Richard A. Krueger,et al.  Analyzing and Reporting Focus Group Results , 1997 .

[11]  Diana G. Oblinger Boomers, Gen-Xers, and Millennials: Understanding the "New Students.". , 2003 .

[12]  Henry Jenkins Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century , 2006 .

[13]  Brigid Barron Interest and Self-Sustained Learning as Catalysts of Development: A Learning Ecology Perspective , 2006, Human Development.

[14]  Michelle M. Chau,et al.  Basic Facts About Low-Income Children: Birth to Age 18 , 2006 .

[15]  Christine Greenhow Connecting Informal and Formal Learning Experiences in the Age of Participatory Media: Commentary on Bull et al. (2008) , 2008 .

[16]  Mark Windschitl,et al.  The WWW and Classroom Research: What Path Should We Take?. , 1998 .

[17]  Mark Ware Learning, Change, and Power: Competing Frames of Technology and Literacy , 2008 .

[18]  伊藤 瑞子 Living and learning with new media : summary of findings from the digital youth project , 2009 .

[19]  Heather A. Horst,et al.  Living and Learning with New Media: White Paper & Summary of Findings from the Digital Youth Project , 1970 .

[20]  Mark Warschauer A Teacher's Place in the Digital Divide , 2007 .

[21]  George D. Kuh,et al.  Adding Value: Learning Communities and Student Engagement , 2004 .

[22]  S. John,et al.  The Access Challenge: Rethinking the Causes of the New Inequality. Policy Issue Report. , 2002 .

[23]  L. Vygotsky Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[24]  Mark Windschitl Using the WWW for Teaching and Learning in K-12 Classrooms: What Are the Interesting Research Questions? , 2000, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[25]  Kellian Clink,et al.  National Center for Children in Poverty , 2011 .

[26]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Whose Space? Differences Among Users and Non-Users of Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[27]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[28]  C. Knox-Quinn International Society for Technology in Education. , 1992 .

[29]  H. Becker Who's Wired and Who's Not , 2000 .

[30]  Kimberly A. Patton Teens and Technology , 2011 .

[31]  Christine Greenhow,et al.  Informal learning and identity formation in online social networks , 2009 .

[32]  Sousan Arafeh,et al.  Writing, Technology and Teens , 2008 .

[33]  Bill McCampbell The Connected School: Technology and Learning in High School , 2001 .

[34]  Shannon D. Smith,et al.  The ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 2009—Key Findings , 2010 .

[35]  Rebecca W. Black Access and Affiliation: The Literacy and Composition Practices of English‐Language Learners in an Online Fanfiction Community , 2005 .

[36]  Donna DeGennaro,et al.  Learning Designs , 2008 .

[37]  Muukkonen Hanni,et al.  Design principles for the Knowledge-Practices Laboratory (KP-Lab) project , 2006 .

[38]  Peter Ackerman,et al.  Networked Nation: Broadband in America , 2009 .

[39]  M. Prensky Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants , 2001 .

[40]  Christine Greenhow,et al.  Response to Comments: Research on Learning and Teaching With Web 2.0: Bridging Conversations , 2009 .

[41]  E. Hargittai,et al.  THE PARTICIPATION DIVIDE: Content creation and sharing in the digital age1 , 2008 .

[42]  Patricia G. Lange,et al.  Living and Learning with New Media: Summary of Findings from the Digital Youth Project , 2009 .

[43]  H. Becker Internet Use by Teachers: Conditions of Professional Use and Teacher-Directed Student Use. Teaching, Learning, and Computing: 1998 National Survey. Report #1. , 1999 .

[44]  Christine Greenhow,et al.  Old Communication, New Literacies: Social Network Sites as Social Learning Resources , 2009, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[45]  M. Volman,et al.  The Web as an Information Resource in K–12 Education: Strategies for Supporting Students in Searching and Processing Information , 2005 .

[46]  Hanni Muukkonen,et al.  Design Principles and Practices for the Knowledge-Practices Laboratory (KP-Lab) Project , 2006, EC-TEL.

[47]  Alexandra Rankin Macgill,et al.  Teens and social media , 2008 .

[48]  Vincent Tinto,et al.  Colleges as Communities: Taking Research on Student Persistence Seriously , 1997, The Review of Higher Education.

[49]  Qing Li Student and Teacher Views About Technology , 2007 .

[50]  Christine Greenhow,et al.  Learning, Teaching, and Scholarship in a Digital Age , 2009 .

[51]  Diana G. Oblinger,et al.  Educating the Net Generation , 2005 .

[52]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.