Wound pH and Surface Temperature as a Predictive Biomarker of Healing in Diabetic Foot Ulcers.

To monitor wound pH and surface temperature as predictors of wound healing in diabetic foot ulcers (DFU). Prospective, observational, time-bound study of 18 months, enrolling patients aged 18 to 60 years with uninfected DFU. The wound was assessed at baseline and after that, every week for 4 weeks according to the leg ulcer measurement tool (LUMT). Concurrently, wound surface pH and temperature were measured. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and a P-value < .05 was considered statistically significant. Fifty-four patients with DFU were included in the study with a mean age of 55 years and a male to female ratio of 1.57. The wound showed progressive improvement, a maximum mean LUMT score of 48.89 (± 2.81) at the initial evaluation and decreased progressively to the mean of 19.80 at week 4 (± 3.43), both of which were statistically significant ( P-value < .001). Similarly, the median wound pH progressively reduced from 7.7 at baseline to 7.20 in the fourth week, and median wound temperature decreased from 90°F (32.22 °C) at baseline to 85°F (29.44 °C) in the fourth week, both of which were statistically significant ( P-value < .001). Progressive and significant change in wound pH to acidic and drop in wound surface temperature, both corresponding to improvement in the status of DFU, maximum at 4 weeks, make them valuable predictors of wound healing. However, further, more extensive studies are required to establish a concrete relationship.

[1]  J. Sugama,et al.  Increased temperature at the healed area detected by thermography predicts recurrent pressure ulcers , 2022, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[2]  K. Cheng,et al.  Higher Periwound Temperature Associated with Wound Healing of Pressure Ulcers Detected by Infrared Thermography , 2021, Journal of clinical medicine.

[3]  Rong Huang,et al.  Flexible integrated sensing platform for monitoring wound temperature and predicting infection , 2021, Microbial biotechnology.

[4]  Jenkuang Lee,et al.  Mobile Health–Based Thermometer for Monitoring Wound Healing After Endovascular Therapy in Patients With Chronic Foot Ulcer: Prospective Cohort Study , 2020, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[5]  H. Haick,et al.  Wearable Sensors and Systems for Wound Healing-Related pH and Temperature Detection , 2021, Micromachines.

[6]  Rosimere Ferreira Santana,et al.  Cross-cultural adaptation of the Leg Ulcer Measurement Tool for Brazil: nursing methodology research. , 2020, Revista brasileira de enfermagem.

[7]  M. Gónzalez-Sánchez,et al.  Clinician Assessment Tools for Patients with Diabetic Foot Disease: A Systematic Review , 2020, Journal of clinical medicine.

[8]  S. Dong,et al.  Smart Flexible Electronics‐Integrated Wound Dressing for Real‐Time Monitoring and On‐Demand Treatment of Infected Wounds , 2020, Advanced science.

[9]  J. Shaw,et al.  Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9th edition. , 2019, Diabetes research and clinical practice.

[10]  Dinesh Kant Kumar,et al.  Is Thermal Imaging a Useful Predictor of the Healing Status of Diabetes-Related Foot Ulcers? A Pilot Study , 2018, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[11]  R. Kirsner,et al.  Diagnosis and Management of Diabetic Foot Complications , 2018, Diabetes.

[12]  Jaynal Abedin,et al.  Monitoring of pH and temperature of neuropathic diabetic and nondiabetic foot ulcers for 12 weeks: An observational study , 2018, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[13]  B. Najafi,et al.  Feasibility and Efficacy of a Smart Mat Technology to Predict Development of Diabetic Plantar Ulcers , 2017, Diabetes Care.

[14]  A. Ibrahim IDF Clinical Practice Recommendation on the Diabetic Foot: A guide for healthcare professionals. , 2017, Diabetes research and clinical practice.

[15]  J. Apelqvist,et al.  High probability of healing without amputation of plantar forefoot ulcers in patients with diabetes , 2015, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[16]  I. Krass,et al.  Adherence to diabetes medication: a systematic review , 2015, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[17]  K. Al-Rubeaan,et al.  Diabetic Foot Complications and Their Risk Factors from a Large Retrospective Cohort Study , 2015, PloS one.

[18]  S. Percival,et al.  The Effect of pH on the Extracellular Matrix and Biofilms. , 2014, Advances in wound care.

[19]  J. Hunt,et al.  The effects of pH on wound healing, biofilms, and antimicrobial efficacy , 2014, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[20]  M. Gebregziabher,et al.  Longitudinal Effects of Medication Nonadherence on Glycemic Control , 2014, The Annals of pharmacotherapy.

[21]  Michael J. Mueller,et al.  Comprehensive Foot Examination and Risk Assessment , 2008, Diabetes Care.

[22]  David G Armstrong,et al.  Skin temperature monitoring reduces the risk for diabetic foot ulceration in high-risk patients. , 2007, The American journal of medicine.

[23]  H. Lambers,et al.  Natural skin surface pH is on average below 5, which is beneficial for its resident flora , 2006, International journal of cosmetic science.

[24]  Rai-Chi Chan,et al.  Relationship of skin temperature to sympathetic dysfunction in diabetic at-risk feet. , 2006, Diabetes research and clinical practice.

[25]  D. Harrison,et al.  Influence of dressing changes on wound temperature. , 2004, Journal of wound care.

[26]  M. G. Woodbury,et al.  Development, Validity, Reliability, and Responsiveness of a New Leg Ulcer Measurement Tool , 2004, Advances in skin & wound care.

[27]  David G Armstrong,et al.  2003 William J. Stickel Silver Award. Skin temperatures as a one-time screening tool do not predict future diabetic foot complications. , 2003, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[28]  J. Griffiths,et al.  The North‐West Diabetes Foot Care Study: incidence of, and risk factors for, new diabetic foot ulceration in a community‐based patient cohort , 2002, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[29]  Z. Xia,et al.  Stimulation of fibroblast growth in vitro by intermittent radiant warming , 2000, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[30]  M. Horžić,et al.  Die Temperaturdynamik während des Heilungsprozesses der chirurgischen Wunde - Temperature Changes in the Operative Wound During the Healing Process , 1995 .

[31]  R. Esclamado,et al.  Effect of local hypothermia on early wound repair. , 1990, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.