On Technological Objects and the Adoption of Technological Product Innovations: Rules, Routines and the Transition from Analogue Photography to Digital Imaging

We extend the transformational model of social activity proposed in recent realist social theory by importing into it a theory of technological objects and technological change. The paper begins with an account of the transformational model, focusing particularly on the relationship between routines and social rules. We then outline a theory of what we call the ‘technical identity’ of technological objects, drawing on the notion of collective assignments of agentive functions proposed by the philosopher John Searle. Finally, we link this theory to the transformational model and derive three broad categories of technological change. The framework as a whole is illustrated with empirical material drawn from a recent study of the shift from analogue photography to digital imaging in consumer photography.

[1]  Markus C. Becker.  Organizational routines: a review of the literature , 2004 .

[2]  P. David.  Clio and the Economics of QWERTY , 1985 .

[3]  M. Feldman.  Organizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change , 2000 .

[4]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[5]  M. Feldman.  A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines , 2003 .

[6]  M. Feldman,et al.  Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change , 2003 .

[7]  Peter Kroes,et al.  Screwdriver Philosophy; Searle's analysis of technical functions , 2003 .

[8]  Paul Nightingale,et al.  If Nelson and Winter are only half right about tacit knowledge, which half? A Searlean critique of 'codification' , 2003 .

[9]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change , 1995 .

[10]  Margaret S. Archer,et al.  Realist social theory: The morphogenetic cycle , 1997 .

[11]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  Routines and Other Recurring Action Patterns of Organizations: Contemporary Research Issues , 1996 .

[12]  H. Klein,et al.  The Social Construction of Technology: Structural Considerations , 2002 .

[13]  Jochen Runde.  Filling in the Background , 2002 .

[14]  M. Feldman,et al.  Organizational Routines as Sources of Connections and Understandings , 2002 .

[15]  J. R Hackman,et al.  Habitual routines in task-performing teams , 1990 .

[16]  Geoffrey M. Hodgson,et al.  The Nature and Replication of Routines , 2009 .

[17]  Margaret S. Archer,et al.  Realism and morphogenesis , 1995 .

[18]  Andrew Hargadon,et al.  When Innovations Meet Institutions: Edison and the Design of the Electric Light , 2001 .

[19]  A. Kumaraswamy,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN THE SPONSORSHIP OF COMMON TECHNOLOGICAL STANDARDS: THE CASE OF SUN MICROSYSTEMS AND JAVA * , 2002 .

[20]  C. Lawson,et al.  An Ontology of Technology: Artefacts, Relations and Functions , 2008 .

[21]  Boelie Elzen,et al.  Two Ultracentrifuges: A Comparative Study of the Social Construction of Artefacts , 1986 .

[22]  T. Pinch,et al.  The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other , 1984 .

[23]  H. Lakhani,et al.  Army european tour extension: A multivariate approach , 1985 .

[24]  Matthew J. Lynch,et al.  Medicine And The State , 1963 .

[25]  N. Phillips,et al.  The Birth of the 'Kodak Moment': Institutional Entrepreneurship and the Adoption of New Technologies , 2005 .

[26]  Stewart Russell.  The Social Construction of Artefacts: a Response to Pinch and Bijker , 1986 .

[27]  Peter Kroes,et al.  The dual nature of technical artefacts , 2006 .

[28]  Dorothy Fragaszy,et al.  Wild capuchin monkeys (Cebus libidinosus) use anvils and stone pounding tools , 2004, American journal of primatology.

[29]  C. Gersick,et al.  Habitual routines in task-performing groups. , 1990, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[30]  Martha S. Feldman,et al.  Organizational Routines as a Unit of Analysis , 2005 .

[31]  K. Munir.  The Social Construction of Events: A Study of Institutional Change in the Photographic Field , 2005 .

[32]  Jochen Runde,et al.  On the Identity of Technological Objects and User Innovations in Function , 2009 .

[33]  John R. Searle,et al.  Social ontology , 2006 .

[34]  W. Orlikowski.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000 .