Comparison of voluntary and forced digital leaps in higher education – Teachers’ experiences of the added value of using digital tools in teaching and learning
暂无分享,去创建一个
P. Kinnunen | E. Pyörälä | Anne Haarala-Muhonen | Henrika Anttila | N. Katajavuori | Liisa Myyry | Veera Kallunki | Tarja Tuononen | Nina Katajavuori | H. Anttila
[1] Luis-Alberto Casado-Aranda,et al. Teachers’ digital competencies in higher education: a systematic literature review , 2022, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education.
[2] P. Kinnunen,et al. COVID-19 Accelerating Academic Teachers’ Digital Competence in Distance Teaching , 2022, Frontiers in Education.
[3] Victoria I. Marín,et al. Emergency remote teaching in higher education: mapping the first global online semester , 2021, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education.
[4] Nguyen Thi Xuan Son,et al. The right to education through online learning in times of Covid-19: a case study at the School of Law, Vietnam National University , 2021 .
[5] V. García-Morales,et al. The Transformation of Higher Education After the COVID Disruption: Emerging Challenges in an Online Learning Scenario , 2021, Frontiers in Psychology.
[6] K. Hew,et al. Transitioning to the “new normal” of learning in unpredictable times: pedagogical practices and learning performance in fully online flipped classrooms , 2020, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education.
[7] J. Fernández-Batanero,et al. Digital competences for teacher professional development. Systematic review , 2020, European Journal of Teacher Education.
[8] Julie Nyanjom,et al. Educators’ emotions involved in the transition to online teaching in higher education , 2020, Higher Education Research & Development.
[9] Chrysi Rapanta,et al. Online University Teaching During and After the Covid-19 Crisis: Refocusing Teacher Presence and Learning Activity , 2020, Postdigital Science and Education.
[10] Qian Liu,et al. Understanding academics' adoption of learning technologies: A systematic review , 2020, Comput. Educ..
[11] Malcolm Brady,et al. Learning management systems and their impact on academic work , 2020 .
[12] Amirrudin Kamsin,et al. Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review , 2020, Comput. Educ..
[13] Torrey Trust,et al. Should Teachers be Trained in Emergency Remote Teaching? Lessons Learned from the COVID-19 Pandemic , 2020 .
[14] Barbara Lockee,et al. The Difference Between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning , 2020 .
[15] C. McLoughlin,et al. Threshold concepts about online pedagogy for novice online teachers in higher education , 2019 .
[16] L. Hellström,et al. Teacher Educators' Use of Digital Tools and Needs for Digital Competence in Higher Education , 2019, Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education.
[17] Carlos Marcelo,et al. From chalk to keyboard in higher education classrooms: changes and coherence when integrating technological knowledge into pedagogical content knowledge , 2019 .
[18] Aikaterini Lalatsa,et al. Technology‐enhanced learning in higher education: How to enhance student engagement through blended learning , 2019, European Journal of Education.
[19] X. Mei,et al. Teachers’ use of digital learning tool for teaching in higher education , 2019, Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education.
[20] Ronny Scherer,et al. Teacher educators as gatekeepers: Preparing the next generation of teachers for technology integration in education , 2019, Br. J. Educ. Technol..
[21] Michael J. Nelson,et al. Mediating factors that influence the technology integration practices of teacher educators , 2019, Comput. Educ..
[22] Victoria I. Marín,et al. Digital transformation in German higher education: student and teacher perceptions and usage of digital media , 2018, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education.
[23] Lauri Malmi,et al. Transforming the learning and educational culture at a university , 2018 .
[24] A. Chester,et al. Leading Developmental Peer Observation of Teaching in Higher Education: Perspectives from Australia and England , 2018 .
[25] Jason M. Lodge,et al. Applying Best Practice Online Learning, Teaching, and Support to Intensive Online Environments: An Integrative Review , 2017, Front. Educ..
[26] P. Häkkinen,et al. Teacher Beliefs Regarding Learning, Pedagogy, and the Use of Technology in Higher Education , 2017 .
[27] M. Adnan. Professional development in the transition to online teaching: The voice of entrant online instructors , 2017, ReCALL.
[28] Lauri Malmi,et al. Aalto Online Learning - a pathway to reforming education at the Aalto University , 2017 .
[29] Sarah Elizabeth O'Shea,et al. Exploring how students narrate their engagement with higher education institutions in an online learning environment , 2017 .
[30] Daniel Reynaud,et al. Navigating Learning Journeys of Online Teachers: Threshold Concepts and Self-efficacy , 2015 .
[31] Liisa Myyry,et al. Open-book, open-web online examinations: Developing examination practices to support university students’ learning and self-efficacy , 2015 .
[32] Janine Delahunty,et al. “I ‘feel’ like I am at university even though I am online.” Exploring how students narrate their engagement with higher education institutions in an online learning environment , 2015 .
[33] Anni Rytkönen,et al. University of Helsinki teachers as users and adopters of change of web-based learning environments in teaching , 2014 .
[34] Linda Price,et al. Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: what is ‘enhanced’ and how do we know? A critical literature review , 2014 .
[35] C. Reigeluth. The Learner-Centered Paradigm of Education: Roles for Technology. , 2014 .
[36] Päivi Häkkinen,et al. INTERACTION AND EEDUCATION: WHAT KIND OF SUPPORT IS NEEDED TO DEVELOP UNIVERSITY TEACHING? , 2014 .
[37] Lauri Malmi,et al. A Review of Generic Program Visualization Systems for Introductory Programming Education , 2013, TOCE.
[38] Liping Deng,et al. From Moodle to Facebook: Exploring students' motivation and experiences in online communities , 2013, Comput. Educ..
[39] Sara Hennessy,et al. Developing a typology of teacher beliefs and practices concerning classroom use of ICT , 2013, Comput. Educ..
[40] P. Petocz,et al. Adopting Mobile Learning in Tertiary Environments: Instructional, Curricular and Organizational Matters , 2013 .
[41] Min Kyu Kim,et al. Teacher Beliefs and Technology Integration. , 2013 .
[42] Päivi Häkkinen,et al. Shared and personal learning spaces: Challenges for pedagogical design , 2012, Internet High. Educ..
[43] Peggy A. Ertmer,et al. Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship , 2012, Comput. Educ..
[44] Ann D. Thompson,et al. Transforming online teaching practice: critical analysis of the literature on the roles and competencies of online teachers , 2011 .
[45] Peggy A. Ertmer,et al. Teacher value beliefs associated with using technology: Addressing professional and student needs , 2010, Comput. Educ..
[46] Robert K. Yin,et al. Qualitative Research from Start to Finish , 2010 .
[47] Fethi A. Inan,et al. Evidence of impact: Transforming teacher education with preparing tomorrow's teachers to teach with technology (PT3) grants , 2010 .
[48] Dale S. Niederhauser,et al. Beyond self-efficacy: Measuring pre-service teachers' Instructional Technology Outcome Expectations , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[49] Xitao Fan,et al. Comparing response rates in e-mail and paper surveys: A meta-analysis , 2009 .
[50] Matthew J. Koehler,et al. Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge , 2006, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.
[51] N. Denzin,et al. Introduction: The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research. , 2005 .
[52] Andy Field,et al. Discovering statistics using SPSS, 2nd ed. , 2005 .
[53] D. Garrison,et al. Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education , 2004, Internet High. Educ..
[54] M. Patton. Qualitative research & evaluation methods , 2002 .
[55] Russel L. Thompson,et al. A Meta-Analysis of Response Rates in Web- or Internet-Based Surveys , 2000 .
[56] A. Bandura. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.
[57] Susan M. Land,et al. The foundations and assumptions of technology-enhanced student-centered learning environments , 1997 .
[58] Deborah Compeau,et al. Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..
[59] Fred D. Davis. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..
[60] A. Bandura. The Explanatory and Predictive Scope of Self-Efficacy Theory , 1986 .
[61] E. Guba,et al. Naturalistic inquiry: Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1985, 416 pp., $25.00 (Cloth) , 1985 .