Global evolutionary isolation measures can capture key local conservation species in Nearctic and Neotropical bird communities

Understanding how to prioritize among the most deserving imperilled species has been a focus of biodiversity science for the past three decades. Though global metrics that integrate evolutionary history and likelihood of loss have been successfully implemented, conservation is typically carried out at sub-global scales on communities of species rather than among members of complete taxonomic assemblages. Whether and how global measures map to a local scale has received little scrutiny. At a local scale, conservation-relevant assemblages of species are likely to be made up of relatively few species spread across a large phylogenetic tree, and as a consequence there are potentially relatively large amounts of evolutionary history at stake. We ask to what extent global metrics of evolutionary history are useful for conservation priority setting at the community level by evaluating the extent to which three global measures of evolutionary isolation (evolutionary distinctiveness (ED), average pairwise distance (APD) and the pendant edge or unique phylogenetic diversity (PD) contribution) capture community-level phylogenetic and trait diversity for a large sample of Neotropical and Nearctic bird communities. We find that prioritizing the most ED species globally safeguards more than twice the total PD of local communities on average, but that this does not translate into increased local trait diversity. By contrast, global APD is strongly related to the APD of those same species at the community level, and prioritizing these species also safeguards local PD and trait diversity. The next step for biologists is to understand the variation in the concordance of global and local level scores and what this means for conservation priorities: we need more directed research on the use of different measures of evolutionary isolation to determine which might best capture desirable aspects of biodiversity.

[1]  A. Mooers,et al.  Measuring Evolutionary Isolation for Conservation , 2014, PloS one.

[2]  Martin Maechler,et al.  Cluster Analysis Extended Rousseeuw et al , 2014 .

[3]  Walter Jetz,et al.  Global Distribution and Conservation of Evolutionary Distinctness in Birds , 2014, Current Biology.

[4]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  The European functional tree of bird life in the face of global change , 2014, Nature Communications.

[5]  L. Buisson,et al.  Toward a loss of functional diversity in stream fish assemblages under climate change , 2013, Global change biology.

[6]  W. Jetz,et al.  The global diversity of birds in space and time , 2012, Nature.

[7]  K. Safi,et al.  Phylogenetically-Informed Priorities for Amphibian Conservation , 2012, PloS one.

[8]  Tyler S. Kuhn,et al.  Investing in evolutionary history: implementing a phylogenetic approach for mammal conservation , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  X. Mi,et al.  A genome evolution-based framework for measures of originality for clades. , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.

[10]  Bruce B. Collette,et al.  The Impact of Conservation on the Status of the World’s Vertebrates , 2010, Science.

[11]  A. Mooers,et al.  Evolutionary Distinctiveness, Threat Status, and Ecological Oddity in Primates , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[12]  M. Cadotte,et al.  Rarest of the rare: advances in combining evolutionary distinctiveness and scarcity to inform conservation at biogeographical scales , 2010 .

[13]  Daniel P Faith,et al.  Threatened Species and the Potential Loss of Phylogenetic Diversity: Conservation Scenarios Based on Estimated Extinction Probabilities and Phylogenetic Risk Analysis , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[14]  Todd H. Oakley,et al.  Evolutionary history and the effect of biodiversity on plant productivity , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  K. Hartmann,et al.  Evolutionarily distinctive species often capture more phylogenetic diversity than expected. , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.

[16]  Kate E. Jones,et al.  The delayed rise of present-day mammals , 1990, Nature.

[17]  N. Isaac,et al.  Mammals on the EDGE: Conservation Priorities Based on Threat and Phylogeny , 2007, PloS one.

[18]  R. G. Davies,et al.  Global Patterns of Geographic Range Size in Birds , 2006, PLoS biology.

[19]  Paul R. Ehrlich,et al.  Ecosystem consequences of bird declines , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Daniel P. Faith,et al.  Integrating Phylogenetic Diversity, Complementarity, and Endemism for Conservation Assessment , 2004 .

[21]  Korbinian Strimmer,et al.  APE: Analyses of Phylogenetics and Evolution in R language , 2004, Bioinform..

[22]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  Preserving the Tree of Life , 2003, Science.

[23]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Phylogenies and Community Ecology , 2002 .

[24]  R. Lande Anthropogenic, ecological and genetic factors in extinction and conservation , 1998, Researches on Population Ecology.

[25]  R. Crozier Preserving the Information Content of Species: Genetic Diversity, Phylogeny, and Conservation Worth , 1997 .

[26]  B. Ashby Dopamine and schizophrenia , 1990, Nature.

[27]  Robert M. May,et al.  Taxonomy as destiny , 1990, Nature.

[28]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[29]  Peter Dalgaard,et al.  R Development Core Team (2010): R: A language and environment for statistical computing , 2010 .

[30]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[31]  Volker Loeschcke,et al.  The optimization of biodiversity conservation , 1995 .

[32]  D. Faith Biodiversity and systematics: The use and misuse of divergence information in assessing taxonomic diversity , 1994 .

[33]  D. Faith Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity , 1992 .

[34]  Paul H. Williams,et al.  What to protect?—Systematics and the agony of choice , 1991 .

[35]  S. Altschul,et al.  Equal animals , 1990, Nature.