An instructional design process based on expert knowledge for teaching students how mechanisms are explained.

In biology and physiology courses, students face many difficulties when learning to explain mechanisms, a topic that is demanding due to the immense complexity and abstract nature of molecular and cellular mechanisms. To overcome these difficulties, we asked the following question: how does an instructor transform their understanding of biological mechanisms and other difficult-to-learn topics so that students can comprehend them? To address this question, we first reviewed a model of the components used by biologists to explain molecular and cellular mechanisms: the MACH model, with the components of methods (M), analogies (A), context (C), and how (H). Next, instructional materials were developed and the teaching activities were piloted with a physical MACH model. Students who used the MACH model to guide their explanations of mechanisms exhibited both improvements and some new difficulties. Third, a series of design-based research cycles was applied to bring the activities with an improved physical MACH model into biology and biochemistry courses. Finally, a useful rubric was developed to address prevalent student difficulties. Here, we present, for physiology and biology instructors, the knowledge and resources for explaining molecular and cellular mechanisms in undergraduate courses with an instructional design process aimed at realizing pedagogical content knowledge for teaching. Our four-stage process could be adapted to advance instruction with a range of models in the life sciences.

[1]  G. Wiggins,et al.  Understanding by Design , 1998 .

[2]  Gili Marbach-Ad,et al.  Attempting to break the code in student comprehension of genetic concepts , 2001 .

[3]  Helen R. Quinn,et al.  A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas , 2013 .

[4]  Carl-Johan Rundgren,et al.  Educational Challenges of Molecular Life Science: Characteristics and Implications for Education and Research , 2010, CBE life sciences education.

[5]  Leonid Rozenblit,et al.  The misunderstood limits of folk science: an illusion of explanatory depth , 2002, Cogn. Sci..

[6]  Ruth Stavy,et al.  Students' cellular and molecular explanations of genetic phenomena , 2000 .

[7]  Trevor R Anderson,et al.  A Model of How Different Biology Experts Explain Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms , 2015, CBE life sciences education.

[8]  Sophia Tsakraklides,et al.  Alumni Perspectives on Career Preparation during a Postdoctoral Training Program: A Qualitative Study , 2015, CBE life sciences education.

[9]  Brian J. Reiser,et al.  Reasoning across Ontologically Distinct Levels: Students' Understandings of Molecular Genetics. , 2007 .

[10]  John Leach,et al.  What's in a cell? — young people's understanding of the genetic relationship between cells, within an individual , 2000 .

[11]  Abbie Brown,et al.  Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in c , 1992 .

[12]  H I Modell,et al.  How to help students understand physiology? Emphasize general models. , 2000, Advances in physiology education.

[13]  Eleanor Abrams,et al.  The how's and why's of biological change: How learners neglect physical mechanisms in their search for meaning , 2001 .

[14]  Jenny McFarland,et al.  The "core principles" of physiology: what should students understand? , 2009, Advances in physiology education.

[15]  Joel Michael,et al.  What makes physiology hard for students to learn? Results of a faculty survey. , 2007, Advances in physiology education.

[16]  Trevor R Anderson,et al.  Exploring the MACH Model’s Potential as a Metacognitive Tool to Help Undergraduate Students Monitor Their Explanations of Biological Mechanisms , 2016, CBE life sciences education.

[17]  B. Alberts The Cell as a Collection of Protein Machines: Preparing the Next Generation of Molecular Biologists , 1998, Cell.

[18]  Alija Kulenović,et al.  Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing , 1999 .

[19]  J. Michael,et al.  A physiologist's view of homeostasis. , 2015, Advances in physiology education.

[20]  L. Shulman Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching , 1986 .

[21]  J. H. Driel,et al.  Developing science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge , 1998 .