Microbial Community Decision Making Models in Batch and Chemostat Cultures

Microbial community simulations using genome scale metabolic networks (GSMs) are relevant for many application areas, such as the analysis of the human microbiome. Such simulations rely on assumptions about the culturing environment, affecting if the culture may reach a metabolically stationary state with constant microbial concentrations. They also require assumptions on decision making by the microbes: metabolic strategies can be in the interest of individual community members or of the whole community. However, the impact of such common assumptions on community simulation results has not been investigated systematically. Here, we investigate four combinations of assumptions, elucidate how they are applied in literature, provide novel mathematical formulations for their simulation, and show how the resulting predictions differ qualitatively. Crucially, our results stress that different assumption combinations give qualitatively different predictions on microbial coexistence by differential substrate utilization. This fundamental mechanism is critically under explored in the steady state GSM literature with its strong focus on coexistence states due to crossfeeding (division of labor).

[1]  Y. Takeuchi,et al.  Two Types of Coexistence in Cross‐Feeding Microbial Consortia , 2008 .

[2]  Radhakrishnan Mahadevan,et al.  Genome-scale dynamic modeling of the competition between Rhodoferax and Geobacter in anoxic subsurface environments , 2011, The ISME Journal.

[3]  Polarization of microbial communities between competitive and cooperative metabolism , 2021, Nature ecology & evolution.

[4]  Denny Popp,et al.  μBialSim: Constraint-Based Dynamic Simulation of Complex Microbiomes , 2020, Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology.

[5]  Gi Bae Kim,et al.  Current status and applications of genome-scale metabolic models , 2019, Genome Biology.

[6]  N. Fierer Embracing the unknown: disentangling the complexities of the soil microbiome , 2017, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[7]  Kenneth J. Kauffman,et al.  Advances in flux balance analysis. , 2003, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[8]  Ali R. Zomorrodi,et al.  d-OptCom: Dynamic multi-level and multi-objective metabolic modeling of microbial communities. , 2014, ACS synthetic biology.

[9]  Daniel Garrido,et al.  Inferring composition and function of the human gut microbiome in time and space: A review of genome-scale metabolic modelling tools , 2020, Computational and structural biotechnology journal.

[10]  Jörg Stelling,et al.  Probabilistic thermodynamic analysis of metabolic networks , 2021, Bioinform..

[11]  R. McGehee,et al.  Competitive Exclusion , 1980, The American Naturalist.

[12]  Rob Knight,et al.  Current understanding of the human microbiome , 2018, Nature Medicine.

[14]  Jérémie Bourdon,et al.  A multi-objective constraint-based approach for modeling genome-scale microbial ecosystems , 2017, PloS one.

[15]  Zachary A. King,et al.  Constraint-based models predict metabolic and associated cellular functions , 2014, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[16]  F. Doyle,et al.  Dynamic flux balance analysis of diauxic growth in Escherichia coli. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[17]  M. Sagot,et al.  Metabolic Games , 2019, Front. Appl. Math. Stat..

[18]  F. Bruggeman,et al.  Community Flux Balance Analysis for Microbial Consortia at Balanced Growth , 2013, PloS one.

[19]  Jingyi Cai,et al.  Predicting Nash equilibria for microbial metabolic interactions , 2020, Bioinform..

[20]  Costas D. Maranas,et al.  SteadyCom: Predicting microbial abundances while ensuring community stability , 2017, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[21]  Roeland M. H. Merks,et al.  Emergence of microbial diversity due to cross-feeding interactions in a spatial model of gut microbial metabolism , 2016, bioRxiv.

[22]  Costas D. Maranas,et al.  OptCom: A Multi-Level Optimization Framework for the Metabolic Modeling and Analysis of Microbial Communities , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[23]  Erwin Frey Evolutionary game theory: Theoretical concepts and applications to microbial communities , 2010 .

[24]  Ali R. Zomorrodi,et al.  Genome-driven evolutionary game theory helps understand the rise of metabolic interdependencies in microbial communities , 2017, Nature Communications.

[25]  Daniel Aguirre de Cárcer,et al.  Experimental and computational approaches to unravel microbial community assembly , 2020 .

[26]  Ya-Xiang Yuan,et al.  Optimization theory and methods , 2006 .

[27]  Jason A. Papin,et al.  Metabolic network modeling of microbial communities , 2015, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine.

[28]  T. Hwa,et al.  Effect of water flow and chemical environment on microbiota growth and composition in the human colon , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.