Meta-Reasoning: Monitoring and Control of Thinking and Reasoning

[1]  C. B. Colby.  The weirdest people in the world , 1973 .

[2]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  Intuition in insight and noninsight problem solving , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[3]  T. O. Nelson.  Metamemory: A Theoretical Framework and New Findings , 1990 .

[4]  L. Reder,et al.  Metacognition does not imply awareness: Strategy choice is governed by implicit learning and memory , 1996 .

[5]  Asher Koriat,et al.  Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy , 1996 .

[6]  A. Koriat.  Monitoring one's own knowledge during study : A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning , 1997 .

[7]  Asher Koriat,et al.  The Feeling of Knowing: Some Metatheoretical Implications for Consciousness and Control , 2000, Consciousness and Cognition.

[8]  J. Raven.  The Raven's Progressive Matrices: Change and Stability over Culture and Time , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  B. Newell,et al.  Take the best or look at the rest? Factors influencing "one-reason" decision making. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  M. Usher,et al.  Dynamics of metacognitive judgments: pre- and postretrieval mechanisms. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  J. Suls,et al.  Flawed Self-Assessment , 2004, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[12]  J. Baranski,et al.  Individual differences in decision processing and confidence judgments in comparative judgment tasks: The role of cognitive styles , 2005 .

[13]  Valerie A Thompson,et al.  Confidence and accuracy in deductive reasoning , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[14]  Eric Wargo,et al.  Psychological Science in the Public Interest , 2006 .

[15]  Asher Koriat,et al.  The intricate relationships between monitoring and control in metacognition: lessons for the cause-and-effect relation between subjective experience and behavior. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[16]  Arndt Bröder,et al.  Challenging some common beliefs: Empirical work within the adaptive toolbox metaphor , 2008, Judgment and Decision Making.

[17]  Valerie A. Thompson,et al.  The role of training, alternative models, and logical necessity in determining confidence in syllogistic reasoning , 2009 .

[18]  V. Thompson.  Dual-process theories: A metacognitive perspective , 2009 .

[19]  F. Strack,et al.  The analysis of intuition: Processing fluency and affect in judgements of semantic coherence , 2009 .

[20]  S. Levinson,et al.  WEIRD languages have misled us, too , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[21]  Benjamin E. Hilbig,et al.  Reconsidering “evidence” for fast-and-frugal heuristics , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[22]  R. Reber,et al.  Immediate truth – Temporal contiguity between a cognitive problem and its solution determines experienced veracity of the solution , 2010, Cognition.

[23]  K. Stanovich.  Rationality and the Reflective Mind , 2010 .

[24]  W. Neys,et al.  Feeling we’re biased: Autonomic arousal and reasoning conflict , 2010, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[25]  Stephen J. Payne,et al.  Giving up problem solving , 2011, Memory & cognition.

[26]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Improving college students’ evaluation of text learning using idea-unit standards , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[27]  K. Stanovich,et al.  The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks , 2011, Memory & cognition.

[28]  D. Kahneman.  Thinking, Fast and Slow , 2011 .

[29]  Valerie A. Thompson,et al.  Intuition, reason, and metacognition , 2011, Cognitive Psychology.

[30]  G. Gigerenzer,et al.  Intuitive and Deliberate Judgments Are Based on Common Principles This Article Has Been Corrected. See Last Page , 2022 .

[31]  Kinga Morsanyi,et al.  Analytic thinking: do you feel like it? , 2012 .

[32]  Will M. Gervais,et al.  Analytic Thinking Promotes Religious Disbelief , 2012, Science.

[33]  David G. Rand,et al.  Divine intuition: cognitive style influences belief in God. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[34]  J. Haidt,et al.  The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion , 2014, Utilitas.

[35]  Rakefet Ackerman,et al.  The persistence of the fluency–confidence association in problem solving , 2012, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[36]  Rainer Greifeneder,et al.  A general model of fluency effects in judgment and decision making , 2013 .

[37]  R. Bjork,et al.  Self-regulated learning: beliefs, techniques, and illusions. , 2013, Annual review of psychology.

[38]  Jonathan Evans,et al.  Science Perspectives on Psychological , 2022 .

[39]  Sabina Kleitman,et al.  Predicting Achievement: Confidence vs Self-Efficacy, Anxiety, and Self-Concept in Confucian and European Countries. , 2013 .

[40]  Rakefet Ackerman,et al.  Is comprehension of problem solutions resistant to misleading heuristic cues? , 2013, Acta psychologica.

[41]  Jamie I. D. Campbell,et al.  Matching bias on the selection task: It's fast and feels good , 2013 .

[42]  O. Houdé,et al.  Bats, balls, and substitution sensitivity: cognitive misers are no happy fools , 2013, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[43]  Rakefet Ackerman,et al.  The role of answer fluency and perceptual fluency as metacognitive cues for initiating analytic thinking , 2013, Cognition.

[44]  D. Murphey,et al.  The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion , 2013 .

[45]  Eye-tracking and reasoning: What your eyes tell about your inferences , 2014 .

[46]  Sabina Kleitman,et al.  The role of a novel formative assessment tool (Stats-mIQ) and individual differences in real-life academic performance☆ , 2014 .

[47]  Simon A. Jackson,et al.  Individual differences in decision-making and confidence: capturing decision tendencies in a fictitious medical test , 2013, Metacognition and Learning.

[48]  Stephen M. Johnson,et al.  Conflict, metacognition, and analytic thinking , 2014 .

[49]  Rakefet Ackerman,et al.  The diminishing criterion model for metacognitive regulation of time investment. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[50]  Keith E. Stanovich,et al.  Assessing miserly information processing: An expansion of the Cognitive Reflection Test , 2014 .

[51]  Jonathan A. Fugelsang,et al.  Cognitive style and religiosity: The role of conflict detection , 2013, Memory & Cognition.

[52]  Rakefet Ackerman,et al.  Meta-reasoning: What can we learn from meta-memory? , 2014 .

[53]  Sabina Kleitman,et al.  Measures of the trait of confidence , 2015 .

[54]  F. Mancini,et al.  Feelings of error in reasoning—in search of a phenomenon , 2015 .

[55]  M. Usher,et al.  Post choice information integration as a causal determinant of confidence: Novel data and a computational account , 2015, Cognitive Psychology.

[56]  Daphna Oyserman,et al.  Just not worth my time? Experienced difficulty and time investment. , 2015 .

[57]  V. Thompson,et al.  Metacognition and abstract reasoning , 2015, Memory & cognition.

[58]  E. Erdfelder,et al.  The relatedness effect on judgments of learning: A closer look at the contribution of processing fluency , 2015, Memory & cognition.

[59]  A. Koriat,et al.  The Self-Consistency Theory of Subjective Confidence , 2016 .

[60]  Sascha Topolinski,et al.  Can I cut the Gordian tnok? The impact of pronounceability, actual solvability, and length on intuitive problem assessments of anagrams , 2016, Cognition.

[61]  Kirsten G. Volz,et al.  Oops, scratch that! Monitoring one’s own errors during mental calculation , 2016, Cognition.

[62]  Paul Serwinek.  Haidt, J. (2012). The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion. New York: Pantheon Books. , 2016 .

[63]  Jonathan J. Rolison,et al.  The time course of conflict on the Cognitive Reflection Test , 2016, Cognition.

[64]  Pauline Howie,et al.  Cognitive Abilities, Monitoring Confidence, and Control Thresholds Explain Individual Differences in Heuristics and Biases , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[65]  Rakefet Ackerman,et al.  Generalizing screen inferiority - does the medium, screen versus paper, affect performance even with brief tasks? , 2016 .

[66]  Rakefet Ackerman,et al.  Understanding metacognitive inferiority on screen by exposing cues for depth of processing , 2017 .

[67]  Rakefet Ackerman,et al.  The puzzle of study time allocation for the most challenging items , 2017, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[68]  Michael L. Mueller,et al.  How beliefs can impact judgments of learning: Evaluating analytic processing theory with beliefs about fluency , 2017 .

[69]  Jonathan A. Fugelsang,et al.  Dunning–Kruger effects in reasoning: Theoretical implications of the failure to recognize incompetence , 2017, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[70]  Rakefet Ackerman,et al.  Meta-Reasoning : Shedding metacognitive light on reasoning research , 2017 .

[71]  Wim De Neys,et al.  Fast logic?: Examining the time course assumption of dual process theory , 2017, Cognition.

[72]  Rakefet Ackerman,et al.  Shared and distinct cue utilization for metacognitive judgements during reasoning and memorisation , 2017 .

[73]  Ellen M. Kok,et al.  The impact of an online tool for monitoring and regulating learning at university: overconfidence, learning strategy, and personality , 2017 .

[74]  Pauline Howie,et al.  Individual Differences in Decision Making Depend on Cognitive Abilities, Monitoring and Control , 2017 .

[75]  V. Thompson,et al.  Rule-Based Reasoning Is Fast and Belief-Based Reasoning Can Be Slow: Challenging Current Explanations of Belief-Bias and Base-Rate Neglect , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.