Identifying Framing Bias in Online News

It has been observed that different media outlets exert bias in the way they report the news, which seamlessly influences the way that readers’ knowledge is built through filtering what we read. Therefore, understanding bias in news media is fundamental for obtaining a holistic view of a news story. Traditional work has focused on biases in terms of “agenda setting,” where more attention is allocated to stories that fit their biased narrative. The corresponding method is straightforward, since the bias can be detected through counting the occurrences of different stories/themes within the documents. However, these methods are not applicable to biases which are implicit in wording, namely, “framing” bias. According to framing theory, biased communicators will select and emphasize certain facts and interpretations over others when telling their story. By focusing on facts and interpretations that conform to their bias, they can tell the story in a way that suits their narrative. Automatic detection of framing bias is challenging since nuances in the wording can change the interpretation of the story. In this work, we aim to investigate how the subtle pattern hidden in language use of a news agency can be discovered and further leveraged to detect frames. In particular, we aim to identify the type and polarity of frame in a sentence. Extensive experiments are conducted on real-world data from different countries. A case study is further provided to reveal possible applications of the proposed method.

[1]  David Lazer,et al.  A Frame of Mind: Using Statistical Models for Detection of Framing and Agenda Setting Campaigns , 2015, ACL.

[2]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  QUOTUS: The Structure of Political Media Coverage as Revealed by Quoting Patterns , 2015, WWW.

[3]  Shanto Iyengar,et al.  News Coverage of the Gulf Crisis and Public Opinion , 1993 .

[4]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Media Landscape in Twitter: A World of New Conventions and Political Diversity , 2011, ICWSM.

[5]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Framing, Agenda Setting, and Priming: The Evolution of Three Media Effects Models , 2007 .

[6]  Ewan Klein,et al.  Natural Language Processing with Python , 2009 .

[7]  Ethan M Balk,et al.  Accuracy of Data Extraction of Non-English Language Trials with Google Translate , 2012 .

[8]  Stefano DellaVigna,et al.  The Fox News Effect: Media Bias and Voting , 2006 .

[9]  Daniel Jurafsky,et al.  Linguistic Models for Analyzing and Detecting Biased Language , 2013, ACL.

[10]  David S. Siroky,et al.  What Animates Political Debates ? Analyzing Ideological Perspectives in Online Debates between Opposing Parties , 2015 .

[11]  Abhinandan Das,et al.  Google news personalization: scalable online collaborative filtering , 2007, WWW '07.

[12]  William A. Gamson,et al.  News as Framing , 1989 .

[13]  Amy X. Zhang,et al.  Identifying and Analyzing Moral Evaluation Frames in Climate Change Blog Discourse , 2014, ICWSM.

[14]  D. Shaw,et al.  Agenda setting function of mass media , 1972 .

[15]  Seungwoo Kang,et al.  NewsCube: delivering multiple aspects of news to mitigate media bias , 2009, CHI.

[16]  Jesse M. Shapiro,et al.  Ideological Segregation Online and Offline , 2010 .

[17]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Characterizing Information Diets of Social Media Users , 2015, ICWSM.

[18]  Jürgen Schmidhuber,et al.  Long Short-Term Memory , 1997, Neural Computation.

[19]  Robert M. Entman,et al.  Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm , 1993 .

[20]  Noah A. Smith,et al.  The Media Frames Corpus: Annotations of Frames Across Issues , 2015, ACL.

[21]  Elisha Elovic,et al.  Testing and Comparing Computational Approaches for Identifying the Language of Framing in Political News , 2015, NAACL.

[22]  Tim Groseclose,et al.  A Measure of Media Bias , 2005 .

[23]  James N. Druckman,et al.  The Impact of Media Bias: How Editorial Slant Affects Voters , 2005, The Journal of Politics.

[24]  Noah A. Smith,et al.  Measuring Ideological Proportions in Political Speeches , 2013, EMNLP.

[25]  Björn W. Schuller,et al.  New Avenues in Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis , 2013, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[26]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Who says what to whom on twitter , 2011, WWW.

[27]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBLINEAR: A Library for Large Linear Classification , 2008, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[28]  Noah A. Smith,et al.  Tracking the Development of Media Frames within and across Policy Issues , 2014 .

[29]  Jürgen Schmidhuber,et al.  Framewise phoneme classification with bidirectional LSTM and other neural network architectures , 2005, Neural Networks.

[30]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[31]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook , 2015, Science.

[32]  R. Kelly Garrett,et al.  The promise and peril of real-time corrections to political misperceptions , 2013, CSCW.

[33]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[34]  Eli Pariser FILTER BUBBLE: Wie wir im Internet entmündigt werden , 2012 .

[35]  J. Crowcroft,et al.  Visualizing Media Bias through Twitter , 2012, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.

[36]  Sean A. Munson,et al.  Presenting diverse political opinions: how and how much , 2010, CHI.

[37]  Christopher D. Manning,et al.  Introduction to Information Retrieval , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[38]  Jungwoo Kim,et al.  The politics of comments: predicting political orientation of news stories with commenters' sentiment patterns , 2011, CSCW.

[39]  Mounia Lalmas,et al.  Social media news communities: gatekeeping, coverage, and statement bias , 2013, CIKM.

[40]  James H. Martin,et al.  Speech and language processing: an introduction to natural language processing, computational linguistics, and speech recognition, 2nd Edition , 2000, Prentice Hall series in artificial intelligence.

[41]  D. Hosmer,et al.  Logistic Regression, Conditional , 2005 .

[42]  Philip Resnik,et al.  More than Words: Syntactic Packaging and Implicit Sentiment , 2009, NAACL.

[43]  Eli Pariser,et al.  The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You , 2011 .

[44]  J. Ross Quinlan,et al.  C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning , 1992 .

[45]  Virgílio A. F. Almeida,et al.  From bias to opinion: a transfer-learning approach to real-time sentiment analysis , 2011, KDD.

[46]  M. McCombs Agenda setting function of mass media , 1977 .

[47]  Patrick C. Meirick,et al.  Wanted, Dead or Alive: Media Frames, Frame Adoption, and Support for the War in Afghanistan , 2007 .

[48]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[49]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Latent Dirichlet Allocation , 2001, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[50]  Michael Halliday,et al.  An Introduction to Functional Grammar , 1985 .

[51]  Luis Alfonso Ureña López,et al.  Random Walk Weighting over SentiWordNet for Sentiment Polarity Detection on Twitter , 2012, WASSA@ACL.

[52]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  A Study of Cross-Validation and Bootstrap for Accuracy Estimation and Model Selection , 1995, IJCAI.

[53]  D. P. Baron,et al.  Persistent Media Bias , 2004 .

[54]  Delip Rao,et al.  Semi-Supervised Polarity Lexicon Induction , 2009, EACL.

[55]  Marko Grobelnik,et al.  DiversiNews: Surfacing Diversity in Online News , 2015, AI Mag..

[56]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[57]  Amber E. Boydstun,et al.  Identifying Media Frames and Frame Dynamics Within and Across Policy Issues , 2013 .