The NMDA receptor antagonist D-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoate (D-AP5) impairs spatial learning and LTP in vivo at intracerebral concentrations comparable to those that block LTP in vitro

This series of experiments investigated whether the NMDA receptor antagonist D-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoate (D-AP5) could induce impairments of spatial learning across a dose range comparable to its impairment of hippocampal long-term potentiation (LTP) in vivo. Estimations of the extracellular concentration of D-AP5 in hippocampus using microdialysis were also made to compare whether these impairments occur at concentrations similar to those required to impair LTP in the in vitro hippocampal slice. Rats were chronically infused with D-AP5 into the lateral ventricle at a range of concentrations (0–50 mM) via osmotic minipumps. They were first trained to find and escape onto a hidden platform in an open-field water maze task. After the behavioral learning, they were anesthetized with urethane and an attempt was made to evoke and monitor hippocampal LTP. Extracellular samples of D-AP5 in hippocampus were then taken using microdialysis, and finally, the animals were killed and tissue samples dissected. The microdialysis and tissue samples were analyzed for D-AP5 content using HPLC with fluorescence detection. The results established, first, that D-AP5 impairs spatial learning in a linear dose-dependent manner, highly correlated with its corresponding impairment of hippocampal LTP in vivo. No concentration of D-AP5 was observed to block LTP without affecting learning. Second, the microdialysis estimates indicated that, subject to certain assumptions, D-AP5 causes these impairments at extracellular concentrations comparable to those that impair LTP in vitro. Third, comparison of the whole tissue and microdialysis samples revealed a concentration ratio of approximately 30:1, indicating that 97% of the intracerebral D-AP5 is inaccessible to the dialysis probes. Infusion of 20 mM EGTA was found to cause a sevenfold increase in D-AP5 in the dialysis perfusates, suggesting that at least part of the inaccessible D-AP5 is trapped by a calcium-dependent mechanism. Two further behavioral control studies indicated that the D-AP5-induced impairment of spatial learning is unlikely to be secondary to a drug- induced motor disturbance, and that the performance of the D-AP5 group whose concentration was just sufficient to block hippocampal LTP completely was statistically indistinguishable from that of a group of rats with bilateral hippocampal lesions induced by ibotenic acid. Taken together, these findings offer support for the hypothesis that activation of NMDA receptors is necessary for certain kinds of learning.

[1]  B. Pitt Psychopharmacology , 1968, Mental Health.

[2]  G. Handelmann,et al.  Hippocampus, space, and memory , 1979 .

[3]  I. Engberg,et al.  The actions of excitatory amino acids on motoneurones in the feline spinal cord. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  M. Eckardt The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map , 1980 .

[5]  J. Macdonald,et al.  L-aspartic acid induces a region of negative slope conductance in the current-voltage relationship of cultured spinal cord neurons , 1982, Brain Research.

[6]  G. Collingridge,et al.  Excitatory amino acids in synaptic transmission in the Schaffer collateral‐commissural pathway of the rat hippocampus. , 1983, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  R. Dingledine N‐methyl aspartate activates voltage‐dependent calcium conductance in rat hippocampal pyramidal cells. , 1983, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  C. Cotman,et al.  Anatomical distributions of four pharmacologically distinct 3H-L-glutamate binding sites , 1983, Nature.

[9]  G. Lynch,et al.  The biochemistry of memory: a new and specific hypothesis. , 1984, Science.

[10]  R. Morris Developments of a water-maze procedure for studying spatial learning in the rat , 1984, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[11]  L. Nowak,et al.  Magnesium gates glutamate-activated channels in mouse central neurones , 1984, Nature.

[12]  A. Ganong,et al.  Long-term potentiation in the hippocampus involves activation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors , 1984, Brain Research.

[13]  C. Cotman,et al.  Distribution of N-methyl-D-aspartate-sensitive L-[3H]glutamate-binding sites in rat brain , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[14]  Bruce L. McNaughton,et al.  Enhancement of hippocampal field potentials in rats exposed to a novel, complex environment , 1985, Brain Research.

[15]  T. Salt,et al.  Mediation of thalamic sensory input by both NMDA receptors and non-NMDA receptors , 1986, Nature.

[16]  N. Dale Excitatory synaptic drive for swimming mediated by amino acid receptors in the lamprey , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[17]  B L McNaughton,et al.  Long-term enhancement of hippocampal synaptic transmission and the acquisition of spatial information , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[18]  G. Lynch,et al.  Selective impairment of learning and blockade of long-term potentiation by an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, AP5 , 1986, Nature.

[19]  S. Butcher,et al.  Extracellular Overflow of Neuroactive Amino Acids During Severe Insulin‐Induced Hypoglycemia: In Vivo Dialysis of the Rat Hippocampus , 1986, Journal of neurochemistry.

[20]  M. Mayer,et al.  The physiology of excitatory amino acids in the vertebrate central nervous system , 1987, Progress in Neurobiology.

[21]  L. Cooper,et al.  A physiological basis for a theory of synapse modification. , 1987, Science.

[22]  E. Costa,et al.  Learning impairment in rats by N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists , 1988, Neuropharmacology.

[23]  Lai-Wo Stan Leung,et al.  APV, an N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonist, blocks the hippocampal theta rhythm in behaving rats , 1988, Brain Research.

[24]  P. Contreras,et al.  Biochemical and behavioral effects of sigma and PCP ligands , 1988, Synapse.

[25]  S. Iversen,et al.  The behavioural effects of MK-801: a comparison with antagonists acting non-competitively and competitively at the NMDA receptor. , 1989, European journal of pharmacology.

[26]  H. Wigström,et al.  Onset Characteristics of Long‐Term Potentiation in the Guinea‐Pig Hippocampal CA1 Region in Vitro , 1989, The European journal of neuroscience.

[27]  H. Benveniste Brain Microdialysis , 1989, Journal of neurochemistry.

[28]  R. Morris Synaptic plasticity and learning: selective impairment of learning rats and blockade of long-term potentiation in vivo by the N-methyl-D- aspartate receptor antagonist AP5 , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[29]  L. Jarrard On the use of ibotenic acid to lesion selectively different components of the hippocampal formation , 1989, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[30]  R. G. M. Morris,et al.  Synaptic plasticity and learning II: Do different kinds of plasticity underlie different kinds of learning? , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  N. Daw,et al.  The location and function of NMDA receptors in cat and kitten visual cortex , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[32]  C. A. Castro,et al.  Recovery of spatial learning deficits after decay of electrically induced synaptic enhancement in the hippocampus , 1989, Nature.

[33]  N. Daw,et al.  The effect of varying stimulus intensity on NMDA-receptor activity in cat visual cortex. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  Michael V. Johnston,et al.  Physiological and pathophysiological roles of excitatory amino acids during central nervous system development , 1990, Brain Research Reviews.

[35]  R. Morris,et al.  Hippocampal synaptic plasticity and NMDA receptors: a role in information storage? , 1990, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[36]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  Hippocampal representation in place learning , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[37]  R. Morris,et al.  Ibotenate Lesions of Hippocampus and/or Subiculum: Dissociating Components of Allocentric Spatial Learning , 1990, The European journal of neuroscience.

[38]  W. Abraham,et al.  Effects of the NMDA antagonists CPP and MK-801 on radial arm maze performance in rats , 1990, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[39]  D. Attwell,et al.  The release and uptake of excitatory amino acids. , 1990, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[40]  J. W. Rudy,et al.  Why NMDA-receptor-dependent long-term potentiation may not be a mechanism of learning and memory: Reappraisal of the NMDA-receptor blockade strategy , 1990, Psychobiology.

[41]  J. Keith,et al.  Why NMDA-receptor—dependent long-term potentiation may not be a learning and memory mechanism, or is it Memorex? A reply to Morris, Gallagher, and Staubli , 1990, Psychobiology.