Evaluating the impact of transmission range on the performance of VANET

Recently, interest in the field of Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks (VANETs) has grown among research community to improve traffic safety and efficiency on the roads. Despite the many advantages, the transmission range in vehicular network remains one of the major challenges due to the unique characteristics of VANETs such as various communication environments, highly dynamic topology, high node mobility and traffic density. The network would suffer from a broadcast-storm in high vehicular density when a fixed transmission range in VANET is used, while in sparse vehicular density the network could be disconnected frequently. In this paper, we evaluated the impact of different transmission ranges and number of flows formed between vehicles in a highway scenario using AODV as routing protocol. In order to validate the simulation of VANET, traffic and network simulators (SUMO & NS-2) have been used. The performance was evaluated in terms of packet delivery ratio and end-to-end delay. The simulation results have shown that better performance was achieved in term of higher PDR and lower end-to-end delay for less than 500 meters transmission range. On the contrary, the PDR started to decrease and end-to-end delay increased when the transmission range exceeded 500 meters. The performance degraded as the number of flows increased.

[1]  Luca Delgrossi,et al.  Optimal data rate selection for vehicle safety communications , 2008, VANET '08.

[2]  Sachin Shetty,et al.  Enhancing connectivity for spectrum-agile Vehicular Ad hoc NETworks in fading channels , 2014, 2014 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium Proceedings.

[3]  Yan Wei,et al.  A Transmission Range Adaptive Broadcast Algorithm for Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks , 2010, 2010 Second International Conference on Networks Security, Wireless Communications and Trusted Computing.

[4]  Garimella Rama Murthy,et al.  Vehicular Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks; Principles and Challenges , 2011, ArXiv.

[5]  Vaibhav Godbole Intelligent Driver Mobility Model and Traffic Pattern Generation based Optimization of Reactive Protocols for Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks , 2013 .

[6]  Sherali Zeadally,et al.  Vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETS): status, results, and challenges , 2010, Telecommunication Systems.

[7]  Nasser Torabi,et al.  Implementation of the IEEE 802.11p/1609.4 DSRC/WAVE in NS-2 , 2014, 2014 4th International Conference on Computer and Knowledge Engineering (ICCKE).

[8]  Sanjay S. Dorle,et al.  Wireless Transmission Impact on the Lifetime of Routing Path in VANET , 2010, 2010 3rd International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering and Technology.

[9]  Wang Ying,et al.  A Novel Routing Protocol for VANETS , 2013 .

[10]  Dipak Ghosal,et al.  Impact of Transmission Power on the Performance of UDP in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[11]  Hannes Hartenstein,et al.  VANET: Vehicular Applications and Inter-Networking Technologies , 2010, VANET.

[12]  A.V. Babu,et al.  Network connectivity of one-dimensional Vehicular Ad hoc Network , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Communications and Signal Processing.

[13]  Erik G. Ström,et al.  Evaluation of the IEEE 802.11p MAC Method for Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communication , 2008, 2008 IEEE 68th Vehicular Technology Conference.

[14]  Anna Maria Vegni,et al.  On the Optimal Design of a Broadcast Data Dissemination System over VANET providing V2V and V2I Communications —The Vision of Rome as a Smart City— , 2013 .

[15]  Amir Qayyum,et al.  MAC Layer Challenges and Proposed Protocols for Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks , 2015 .

[16]  Sidi-Mohammed Senouci,et al.  Introduction to Vehicular Networks , 2009 .