Augmenting Voting Interfaces to Improve Accessibility and Performance
暂无分享,去创建一个
Reading disabled (RD) voters represent approximately 1 in 7 voters. Current electronic voting technologies exhibit substantially different error rates between RD voters and non-RD voters. These error rates are not consistent. For example, full-faced voting systems are better suited for RD individuals, while page-by-page systems are better for non-RD voters. We seek to analyze the differences in the voter’s performance in order to build interfaces that reduce mistakes and errors for both RD and non-RD voters.
[1] L. Silver,et al. Learning Disabilities , 1987 .
[2] D. Hammill,et al. A New Definition of Learning Disabilities , 1988, Journal of learning disabilities.
[3] K. Flannery,et al. Male prevalence for reading disability is found in a large sample of Black and White children free from ascertainment bias , 2000, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.
[4] Michael Tomz,et al. How Does Voting Equipment Affect the Racial Gap in Voided Ballots , 2003 .