Development and implementation of “Check of Medication Appropriateness” (CMA): advanced pharmacotherapy-related clinical rules to support medication surveillance

BackgroundTo improve medication surveillance and provide pharmacotherapeutic support in University Hospitals Leuven, a back-office clinical service, called “Check of Medication Appropriateness” (CMA), was developed, consisting of clinical rule based screening for medication inappropriateness. The aim of this study is twofold: 1) describing the development of CMA and 2) evaluating the preliminary results, more specifically the number of clinical rule alerts, number of actions on the alerts and acceptance rate by physicians.MethodsCMA focuses on patients at risk for potentially inappropriate medication and involves the daily checking by a pharmacist of high-risk prescriptions generated by advanced clinical rules integrating patient specific characteristics with details on medication. Pharmacists’ actions are performed by adding an electronic note in the patients’ medical record or by contacting the physician by phone. A retrospective observational study was performed to evaluate the primary outcomes during an 18-month study period.Results39,481 clinical rule alerts were checked by pharmacists for which 2568 (7%) electronic notes were sent and 637 (1.6%) phone calls were performed. 37,782 (96%) alerts were checked within four pharmacotherapeutic categories: drug use in renal insufficiency (25%), QTc interval prolonging drugs (11%), drugs with a restricted indication or dosing (14%) and overruled very severe drug-drug interactions (50%). The emergency department was a frequently involved ward and anticoagulants are the drug class for which actions are most frequently carried out. From the 458 actions performed for the four abovementioned categories, 69% were accepted by physicians.ConclusionsThese results demonstrate the added value of CMA to support medication surveillance in synergy with already integrated basic clinical decision support and bedside clinical pharmacy. Otherwise, the study also highlighted a number of limitations, allowing improvement of the service.

[1]  David W. Bates,et al.  The evolution of the market for commercial computerized physician order entry and computerized decision support systems for prescribing , 2016, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[2]  A. Camm,et al.  European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of new oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. , 2013, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[3]  Robert C. Wolpert,et al.  A Review of the , 1985 .

[4]  R. Frontini,et al.  EAHP survey 2010 on hospital pharmacy in Europe: parts 4 and 5. Clinical services and patient safety , 2013 .

[5]  David W. Bates,et al.  Can surveillance systems identify and avert adverse drug events? A prospective evaluation of a commercial application. , 2008, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[6]  E. Roughead,et al.  Drug‐related hospital admissions: a review of Australian studies published 1988‐1996 , 1998, The Medical journal of Australia.

[7]  Thomas H. Payne,et al.  Review Paper: Medication-related Clinical Decision Support in Computerized Provider Order Entry Systems: A Review , 2007, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[8]  D. Warren,et al.  Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter-related infection: 2009 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. , 2009, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[9]  N. Porta,et al.  Prevalence, risk factors and main features of adverse drug reactions leading to hospital admission , 2013, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

[10]  E. Shortliffe Computer programs to support clinical decision making. , 1990, JAMA.

[11]  Nicolette de Keizer,et al.  The impact of computerized physician medication order entry in hospitalized patients - A systematic review , 2008, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[12]  Mirjam K. Rommers,et al.  Evaluation of rule effectiveness and positive predictive value of clinical rules in a Dutch clinical decision support system in daily hospital pharmacy practice , 2013, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[13]  Willemijn L. Eppenga,et al.  Comparison of a basic and an advanced pharmacotherapy-related clinical decision support system in a hospital care setting in the Netherlands , 2012, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[14]  R. Raschke,et al.  A computer alert system to prevent injury from adverse drug events: development and evaluation in a community teaching hospital. , 1998, JAMA.

[15]  Bjorn Winkens,et al.  Evaluation of clinical rules in a standalone pharmacy based clinical decision support system for hospitalized and nursing home patients , 2015, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[16]  W. Churchill,et al.  Computer-based system for preventing adverse drug events. , 2004, American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.

[17]  David Newby,et al.  Do computerised clinical decision support systems for prescribing change practice? A systematic review of the literature (1990-2007) , 2009, BMC health services research.

[18]  W. J. Mulder,et al.  The support of medication reviews in hospitalised patients using a clinical decision support system , 2016, SpringerPlus.

[19]  David W. Bates,et al.  Review Paper: What Evidence Supports the Use of Computerized Alerts and Prompts to Improve Clinicians' Prescribing Behavior? , 2009, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[20]  Jeffrey L Schnipper,et al.  Clinical pharmacists and inpatient medical care: a systematic review. , 2006, Archives of internal medicine.

[21]  Marc Berg,et al.  Overriding of drug safety alerts in computerized physician order entry. , 2006, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[22]  P. Hudson,et al.  Medication errors: hospital pharmacist perspective. , 2005, Drugs.

[23]  Henk-Jan Guchelaar,et al.  A Computerized Adverse Drug Event Alerting System Using Clinical Rules , 2011, Drug safety.

[24]  ELSKE AMMENWERTH,et al.  Review Paper: The Effect of Electronic Prescribing on Medication Errors and Adverse Drug Events: A Systematic Review , 2008, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[25]  A. Egberts,et al.  Frequency of and Risk Factors for Preventable Medication-Related Hospital Admissions in the Netherlands , 2009 .

[26]  Monique W. M. Jaspers,et al.  Effects of clinical decision-support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a synthesis of high-quality systematic review findings , 2011, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..