Modeling an irritant gas plume for epidemiologic study

Plume dispersion modeling systems are often used in assessing human exposures to chemical hazards for epidemiologic study. We modeled the 2005 Graniteville, South Carolina, 54,915 kg railcar chlorine release using both the Areal Locations of Hazardous Atmospheres and Hazard Prediction and Assessment Capability (HPAC) plume modeling systems. We estimated the release rate by an engineering analysis combining semi-quantitative observations and fundamental physical principles. The use of regional meteorological conditions was validated by comparing concentration estimates generated by two source-location weather data-sets. The HPAC model estimated a chlorine plume with 20 ppm outdoor concentrations up to 7 km downwind and 0.25 km upwind/downgrade. A comparative analysis of our two models showed that HPAC was the best candidate for use as a model system on which epidemiologic studies could be based after further model validation. Further validation studies are needed before individual exposure estimates can be reliable and the chlorine plume more definitively modeled.

[1]  John Howard Perry,et al.  Chemical Engineers' Handbook , 1934 .

[2]  Seshu Dharmavaram,et al.  Comparison of six widely‐used dense gas dispersion models for three recent chlorine railcar accidents , 2008 .

[3]  Steve Warner,et al.  Evaluation of Transport and Dispersion Models: A Controlled Comparison of HPAC and NARAC Predictions , 2001 .

[4]  Bin Zou,et al.  Air pollution exposure assessment methods utilized in epidemiological studies. , 2009, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[5]  C. J. Lea,et al.  Use of Advanced Techniques to Model the Dispersion of Chlorine in Complex Terrain , 2001 .

[6]  Robert L Buckley,et al.  Modeling Dispersion from Toxic Gas Released after a Train Collision in Graniteville, SC , 2007, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[7]  J. Heagy,et al.  Comparisons of Transport and Dispersion Model Predictions of the Joint Urban 2003 Field Experiment , 2008 .

[8]  Bruce G. Terrell,et al.  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration , 2020, Federal Regulatory Guide.

[9]  Don W. Green,et al.  Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook , 2007 .

[10]  Robert Jones,et al.  Chlorine Gas: An Evolving Hazardous Material Threat and Unconventional Weapon , 2010, The western journal of emergency medicine.

[11]  S. Hanna,et al.  Evaluation of the Hazard Prediction and Assessment Capability (HPAC) Model with the Oklahoma City Joint Urban 2003 (JU2003) Tracer Observations , 2008 .

[12]  Krassimir Georgiev,et al.  Advances in Air Pollution Modeling for Environmental Security , 2005 .

[13]  J. C. Leung,et al.  A generalized correlation for one‐component homogeneous equilibrium flashing choked flow , 1986 .

[14]  Steve Warner,et al.  Comparisons of Transport and Dispersion Model Predictions of the Mock Urban Setting Test Field Experiment , 2006 .

[15]  S. A. Fisher,et al.  Experimental Determination of Two-Phase Flow Rates of Hydrocarbons Through Restrictions , 2006 .

[16]  J. Leung,et al.  A Generalized Correlation for Two-Phase Nonflashing Homogeneous Choked Flow , 1990 .

[17]  Steven R. Hanna,et al.  Handbook on atmospheric diffusion , 1982 .

[18]  Liang-Chy Chien.  Aloha , 2014 .

[19]  David Werth,et al.  A case study of chlorine transport and fate following a large accidental release , 2012 .

[20]  Rex Britter,et al.  Toxic industrial chemical (TIC) source emissions modeling for pressurized liquefied gases , 2011 .