Business Reputation and Labor Efficiency, Productivity, and Cost

Assumed benefits from improved reputation are often used as motives to drive corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives. Are improved cost efficiencies among these reputation benefits? Cost efficiencies and cost management have become more relevant as revenue streams dry up in these tough economic times. Can a good reputation aid these efforts to develop cost efficiencies specifically when managing labor costs? Prior research hypothesizes that good reputation can create labor productivity and efficiency benefits. The purpose of this study is to empirically investigate reputation’s relationship with labor efficiency, labor productivity, and labor cost. Using a sample of highly reputable firms from Fortune’s America’s Most Admired Companies list and a corresponding matched sample of firms, we find that reputation is associated with improved labor efficiency and labor productivity. However, we do not find a significant association between reputation and reduced labor costs. Our study contributes to current research hypothesizing and finding efficiency benefits associated with good reputation. Documenting these potential reputation benefits has important implications for CSR activities and initiatives. It supports recent work that incorporates reputation into a more developed model of the relationship between CSR and performance (Vilanova et al.: 2009, Journal of Business Ethics87, 57–69). This work is useful to businesses and supports strategies focused on “doing well by doing good” and maintaining healthy reputations.

[1]  F. Schmidt,et al.  Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 2003 .

[2]  Joel Podolny.  A Status-Based Model of Market Competition , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[3]  A. Carroll.  A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance , 1979 .

[4]  Bradley R. Agle,et al.  The Relationship between Social and Financial Performance , 1999 .

[5]  篠原 正明,et al.  William W.Cooper,Lawrence M.Seiford,Kaoru Tone 著, DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS : A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000年, 318頁 , 2002 .

[6]  K. Smith,et al.  Does brand management of corporate reputation translate into higher market value? , 2010 .

[7]  Henry Mintzberg.  The rise and fall of strategic planning , 1993 .

[8]  Amiya K. Basu,et al.  Salesforce Compensation Plans: An Agency Theoretic Perspective , 1985 .

[9]  Jeff Frooman.  Stakeholder Influence Strategies , 1999 .

[10]  A. Campbell,et al.  Corporate strategy: The quest for parenting advantage , 1995 .

[11]  C. Fombrun,et al.  What's in a Name? Reputation Building and Corporate Strategy , 1990 .

[12]  G. Lee Willinger,et al.  Financial Implications of the Decision to Increase Reliance on Contingent Labor , 2001, Decis. Sci..

[13]  Anne E. Polivka,et al.  On the Definition of "Contingent Work." , 1989 .

[14]  John Elkington,et al.  Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st‐century business , 1998 .

[15]  G. Dowling,et al.  Creating Corporate Reputations , 2002 .

[16]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  A field study of the impact of a performance-based incentive plan , 1996 .

[17]  Ying Fan.  Ethical branding and corporate reputation , 2005 .

[18]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[19]  Abagail McWilliams,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility: a Theory of the Firm Perspective , 2001 .

[20]  R. Frank.  Choosing the Right Pond: Human Behavior and the Quest for Status , 1986 .

[21]  E. Brenda,et al.  Evolution and Implementation: A Study of Values , 2002 .

[22]  R. Edward Freeman,et al.  Response: Divergent Stakeholder Theory , 1999 .

[23]  Betty J. Simkins,et al.  Corporate Governance, Board Diversity, and Firm Value , 2003 .

[24]  G. Dowling,et al.  Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance , 2002 .

[25]  M. Porter,et al.  Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. , 2006, Harvard business review.

[26]  A. o'sullivan.  Economics Principles in Action , 2001 .

[27]  J. Mahon,et al.  The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate , 1997 .

[28]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[29]  A. J. Sison,et al.  The Cultural Dimension of Codes of Corporate Governance: A Focus on the Olivencia Report , 2000 .

[30]  T. Gössling,et al.  The Worth of Values – A Literature Review on the Relation Between Corporate Social and Financial Performance , 2008 .

[31]  J. Rosett.  Labour leverage, equity risk and corporate policy choice , 2003 .

[32]  For business or the good of all? A Finnish approach to corporate social responsibility , 2004 .

[33]  J. Elkington.  Cannibals with Forks , 1997 .

[34]  T. Gössling,et al.  Social Role Conceptions and CSR Policy Success , 2007 .

[35]  A Great Company Can Be a Great Investment , 2006 .

[36]  A. Wicks,et al.  Convergent Stakeholder Theory , 1999 .

[37]  Geoffrey B. Sprinkle,et al.  The effects of monetary incentives on effort and task performance: theories, evidence, and a framework for research , 2002 .

[38]  D. Wood.  Corporate Social Performance Revisited , 1991 .

[39]  Peter Pruzan,et al.  The Question of Organizational Consciousness: Can Organizations Have Values, Virtues and Visions? , 2001 .

[40]  T. Jones.  INSTRUMENTAL STAKEHOLDER THEORY: A SYNTHESIS OF ETHICS AND ECONOMICS , 1995 .

[41]  M. Porter.  Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance , 1985 .

[42]  Charles J. Fombrun,et al.  Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image , 1996 .

[43]  B. Gray.  Cross-Sectoral Partners: Collaborative Alliances among Business, Government and Communities , 1996 .

[44]  Andrew Pettigrew,et al.  The Handbook of Strategy and Management , 2001 .

[45]  L. Preston,et al.  The Corporate Social-Financial Performance Relationship , 1997 .

[46]  Stuart Landon,et al.  The Use of Quality and Reputation Indicators by Consumers: The Case of Bordeaux Wine , 1997 .

[47]  Angela Clinton.  Flexible labor: Restructuring the American work force , 1997 .

[48]  Jeanne M. Brett,et al.  Agency Theory and Variable Pay Compensation Strategies , 1996 .

[49]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[50]  W. Cooper,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software , 1999 .

[51]  John Kay,et al.  Foundations Of Corporate Success , 1995 .

[52]  Ram C. Rao,et al.  Compensating Heterogeneous Salesforces: Some Explicit Solutions , 1990 .

[53]  R. Banker,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of Continuing Improvements Following the Implementation of a Performance-Based Compensation Plan , 1999 .

[54]  J. Rosett.  Equity Risk and the Labor Stock: The Case of Union Contracts , 2001 .

[55]  P. Groenewegen,et al.  A Bibliometric Analysis of 30 Years of Research and Theory on Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Social Performance , 2005 .

[56]  Edieal J. Pinker,et al.  Optimizing the use of contingent labor when demand is uncertain , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[57]  A. Carroll.  A Three-Dimensional Conceptual , 1979 .

[58]  C. Shapiro.  Premiums for High Quality Products as Returns to Reputations , 1983 .

[59]  A. S. Blinder,et al.  Paying for productivity : a look at the evidence , 1990 .

[60]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  Green and Competitive : Ending the Stalemate , 1996 .

[61]  Marc Vilanova,et al.  Exploring the Nature of the Relationship Between CSR and Competitiveness , 2008 .

[62]  D. Payne,et al.  Evolution and Implementation: A Study of Values, Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility , 2002 .

[63]  José Allouche,et al.  A Meta-analytical investigation of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance , 2005 .

[64]  Kendall Roth,et al.  Why Companies Go Green: A Model of Ecological Responsiveness , 2000 .

[65]  Martin T. Stuebs,et al.  Corporate Reputation And Technical Efficiency: Evidence From The Chemical And Business Services Industries , 2011 .

[66]  David Hess,et al.  The Next Wave of Corporate Community Involvement: Corporate Social Initiatives , 2002 .

[67]  Marcellus Jones,et al.  The drivers of corporate social responsibility : a critical review , 2006 .

[68]  Karen E. Schnietz,et al.  Exploring the Financial Value of a Reputation for Corporate Social Responsibility During a Crisis , 2005 .

[69]  J. Harrison,et al.  STAKEHOLDERS, SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY, AND PERFORMANCE: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE AND THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES , 1999 .

[70]  M. Freeland,et al.  National Hospital Input Price Index , 1979, Health care financing review.

[71]  R. Edward Freeman,et al.  Divergent Stakeholder Theory , 1999 .

[72]  David R. Jackson,et al.  The strategic power of corporate values , 1994 .

[73]  G. Milkovich,et al.  Relationships Among Risk, Incentive Pay, and Organizational Performance , 1998 .

[74]  Irene M. Herremans,et al.  An investigation of corporate social responsibility reputation and economic performance , 1993 .

[75]  Lawrence M. Kahn,et al.  Paying for Productivity. , 1992 .

[76]  Edieal J. Pinker,et al.  Contingent Labor Contracting Under Demand and Supply Uncertainty , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[77]  N. Sum,et al.  Globalization and Paradoxes of Ethical Transnational Production: Code of Conduct in a Chinese Workplace , 2005 .

[78]  C. Huxham.  Creating Collaborative Advantage , 1997 .

[79]  Anne E. Polivka.  Contingent and Alternative Work Arrangements, Defined. , 1996 .

[80]  John A. Wagner,et al.  Incentive payment and nonmanagerial productivity: An interrupted time series analysis of magnitude and trend , 1988 .

[81]  C. Prahalad,et al.  To revitalize corporate performance, we need a whole new model of strategy. Strategic intent. , 1989, Harvard business review.

[82]  N. Smith,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility: Whether or How? , 2003 .