Abstract Revolutionary changes in how cargo and people are transported into space are needed to enable the affordable development and exploration of space in the 21st century. Diverse efforts to achieve major, but incremental Earth-to-orbit (ETO) improvements in the relatively near term have been undertaken in recent years in the US, including the Department of Defense evolved expendable launch vehicle system development project. The NASA-industry reusable launch vehicle (RLV) program is addressing this challenge for the mid-term. The RLV program will validate the technology to enable industry to develop all-rocket reusable launch systems that can deliver payloads from the current Civil Needs Data Base in the 20,000–40,000 pounds class and smaller to low Earth orbit (LEO) at costs of approximately $1000–$2000 per pound. This represents a factor of 5 (or more) reduction below existing launch services. This “next generation” improvement in launch capability is a vital element of the US National Space Transportation policy for current and planned government and commercial payloads. The longer-term challenge is also being addressed. During 1995–1997, NASA conducted the highly reusable space transportation (HRST) study project to address the longer-term challenge: how to achieve an additional factor of 10 reduction in launch costs—to approximately $100–$200 per payload pound to LEO—thus enabling a revolutionary expansion of space activity and enterprise. The HRST study has identified a “grand strategy” for achieving these cost goals, based on pursuing a revolutionary advance in main propulsion architectures and technology for ETO systems to enable a dramatic improvements in subsystem operability. The HRST study has examined diverse approaches, including combination propulsion systems, combined cycle propulsion, launch assist systems, and revolutionary rocket propulsion. An integrated assessment has been conducted, including both the concepts defined as part of the study as well as past concepts. This assessment suggests that the cost goals of HRST are achievable within the next 10–20 years if appropriate technology investments are pursued. This paper provides a summary report on the results and findings of the HRST study project.
[1]
Michael D. Griffin,et al.
The cost of access to space
,
1994
.
[2]
Michael J. Neufeld,et al.
The Rocket and the Reich: Peenemunde and the Coming of the Ballistic Missile Era
,
1994
.
[3]
John Mankins.
The MagLifter - An advanced concept using electromagnetic propulsion in reducing the cost of space
,
1994
.
[4]
William Escher,et al.
A user's primer for comparative assessments of all-rocket and rocket-based combined-cycle propulsion systems for advanced Earth-to-orbit space transport applications
,
1995
.
[5]
Cort L. Durocher,et al.
National Space Transportation Studies
,
1986
.
[6]
Douglas O. Stanley,et al.
Design options for advanced manned launch systems (AMLS)
,
1990
.
[7]
Douglas O. Stanley,et al.
Advanced manned launch system (AMLS) review
,
1989
.
[8]
E. A. Folomeev,et al.
Rocket based combined cycles for vertical take-off space vehicles
,
1995
.
[9]
William Escher.
Motive power for next generation space transports - Combined airbreathing + rocket propulsion
,
1995
.
[10]
Makoto Nagatomo,et al.
Feasibility study on linear-motor-assisted take-off (LMATO) of winged launch vehicle
,
1987
.
[11]
Howard E. McCurdy.
The cost of space flight
,
1994
.