On the impact of motion-thrust coupling in floating tidal energy applications

Abstract Floating systems provide an opportunity to expand the available tidal stream energy resource and reduce the levelised cost of energy by increasing the number of viable deployment sites; simplifying the installation, maintenance and decommissioning; and by accessing greater flow speeds near the free surface. However, the inevitable exposure to free surface conditions raises questions over both the power delivery and the survivability of these systems, both due to the presence of waves and the associated excitation of the floating structures. Without addressing these concerns through scale modelling in laboratories and prototype deployments, the risk to investors is too high to gain significant support for the industry. Therefore, this paper presents physical modelling and analysis of a 1:12 scale model of the Modular Tide Generators floating tidal platform concept, a pseudo-generic design consisting of a catamaran-style platform, catenary mooring system and a submerged horizontal axis tidal turbine. The behaviour of the full system is explored in a range of wave, current, and following wave–current conditions; with and without the turbine; and in rigidly fixed and moored configurations. The results imply that a linear superposition of waves and currents is an adequate modelling approach for determining the mean and cyclic values for the mooring loads and motion of the system. However, the loading on, and power generated by, the turbine are more complex and have implications for power delivery quality and the lifespan of the turbine. In particular, the magnitude of the cyclic loading increases with the current speed, as well as the surge and pitch motion which is observed to be most influential near harmonics of the pitch resonance frequency.

[1]  I. Owen,et al.  The effects of wave–current interaction on the performance of a model horizontal axis tidal turbine , 2014 .

[2]  Mohamed Benbouzid,et al.  Tidal energy site characterization for marine turbine optimal installation: Case of the Ouessant Island in France , 2017 .

[3]  Michael Selwyn Longuet-Higgins,et al.  Mass transport in water waves , 1953, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[4]  Mohamed Benbouzid,et al.  Developments in large marine current turbine technologies – A review , 2017 .

[5]  Elisabetta Tedeschi,et al.  Grid integration and power quality testing of Marine Energy Converters: Research activities in the MaRINET Project , 2014, 2014 Ninth International Conference on Ecological Vehicles and Renewable Energies (EVER).

[6]  Lars Johanning,et al.  First Steps toward a Multi-Parameter Optimisation Tool for Floating Tidal Platforms – Assessment of an LCoE-Based Site Selection Methodology , 2017 .

[7]  P. Fraenkel,et al.  Matching tidal current plants to local flow conditions , 1998 .

[8]  Luksa Luznik,et al.  The effect of surface waves on the performance characteristics of a model tidal turbine , 2011 .

[9]  S. Tatum,et al.  CFD modelling of a tidal stream turbine subjected to profiled flow and surface gravity waves , 2016 .

[10]  O. Madsen,et al.  Combined wave and current interaction with a rough bottom , 1979 .

[11]  L. E. Myers,et al.  Fundamentals applicable to the utilisation of marine current turbines for energy production , 2003 .

[12]  George Gabriel Stokes,et al.  On the theory of oscillatory waves , 2009 .

[13]  Luksa Luznik,et al.  The influence of surface gravity waves on marine current turbine performance , 2013 .

[14]  W. Sheng,et al.  Economic and socio-economic assessment methods for ocean renewable energy: Public and private perspectives , 2015 .

[15]  S. Loyer,et al.  Wind turbine wake properties: Comparison between a non-rotating simplified wind turbine model and a rotating model , 2013 .

[16]  Yong Ma,et al.  The effects of surge motion of the floating platform on hydrodynamics performance of horizontal-axis tidal current turbine , 2015 .

[17]  A. Olczak,et al.  The influence of waves on tidal stream turbine arrays , 2016 .

[18]  Patrick Devine-Wright,et al.  Enhancing local distinctiveness fosters public acceptance of tidal energy: A UK case study , 2011 .

[19]  Yonggang Lin,et al.  Indirect load measurements for large floating horizontal-axis tidal current turbines , 2020 .

[20]  AbuBakr S. Bahaj,et al.  Experimental verifications of numerical predictions for the hydrodynamic performance of horizontal axis marine current turbines , 2007 .

[21]  Long Chen,et al.  A review of survivability and remedial actions of tidal current turbines , 2015 .

[22]  Davide Medici,et al.  Experimental studies of wind turbine wakes : power optimisation and meandering , 2005 .

[23]  Liang Zhang,et al.  Study of the hydrodynamic derivatives of vertical-axis tidal current turbines in surge motion , 2016 .

[24]  Gregorio Iglesias,et al.  Grid parity in tidal stream energy projects: An assessment of financial, technological and economic LCOE input parameters , 2016 .

[25]  Mukrimin Sevket Guney,et al.  Classification and assessment of energy storage systems , 2017 .

[26]  S. Neill,et al.  Resource assessment for future generations of tidal-stream energy arrays , 2015 .

[27]  Ervin Bossanyi,et al.  Wind Energy Handbook , 2001 .

[28]  S. Neill,et al.  Tidal stream resource characterisation in progressive versus standing wave systems , 2018, Applied Energy.

[29]  Motohiko Umeyama,et al.  Coupled PIV and PTV Measurements of Particle Velocities and Trajectories for Surface Waves Following a Steady Current , 2011 .

[30]  Benoît Gaurier,et al.  Flume tank characterization of marine current turbine blade behaviour under current and wave loading , 2013 .

[31]  R. Simons,et al.  The interaction of waves and a turbulent current: waves propagating against the current , 1983, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[32]  R. Simons,et al.  The interaction between waves and a turbulent current: waves propagating with the current , 1982, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[33]  Benoit Dal Ferro,et al.  Wave and tidal energy: Its Emergence and the Challenges it Faces , 2006 .

[34]  L. E. Myers,et al.  Experimental analysis of the flow field around horizontal axis tidal turbines by use of scale mesh disk rotor simulators , 2010 .

[35]  John Ringwood,et al.  A Blind Comparative Study of Focused Wave Interactions with Floating Structures (CCP-WSI Blind Test Series 3) , 2020 .

[36]  Pasquale M. Sforza,et al.  Three-Dimensional Wakes of Simulated Wind Turbines , 1981 .

[37]  G.J.W. Van Bussel,et al.  Experimental comparison of a wind-turbine and of an actuator-disc near wake , 2016 .

[38]  L. E. Myers,et al.  Quantifying wave and yaw effects on a scale tidal stream turbine , 2014 .

[39]  Peter Stansby,et al.  Experimental study of extreme thrust on a tidal stream rotor due to turbulent flow and with opposing waves , 2014 .

[40]  Siming Zheng,et al.  Development of a fully nonlinear, coupled numerical model for assessment of floating tidal stream concepts , 2020 .

[41]  S. Neill,et al.  Characteristics of the velocity profile at tidal-stream energy sites , 2017 .

[42]  Irene Penesis,et al.  Hydrodynamic modelling of marine renewable energy devices : a state of the art review , 2015 .

[43]  Sa Brown,et al.  Developing a coupled turbine thrust methodology for floating tidal stream concepts: Verification under prescribed motion , 2020 .