The Future of U.S. Non-Strategic Nuclear Weapons and Implications for NATO Drifting Toward the Foreseeable Future

[1]  M. May,et al.  Effectiveness of Nuclear Weapons against Buried Biological Agents , 2004 .

[2]  Juan Velasco,et al.  The Future of the U.S , 2005 .

[3]  Graham Allison,et al.  Nuclear Terrorism: The Ultimate Preventable Catastrophe , 2004 .

[4]  R. Lebow.  Deterrence: Then and now , 2005 .

[5]  P. Morgan.  Taking the long view of deterrence , 2005 .

[6]  J. Larsen,et al.  Controlling Non-Strategic Nuclear Weapons: Obstacles and Opportunities , 2001 .

[7]  Gerard J. Degroot,et al.  The Bomb: A Life , 2004 .

[8]  Charles L. Glaser,et al.  Critiquing the NPR’s New Nuclear Missions , 2005 .

[9]  Amy F. Woolf.  Conventional Warheads for Long-Range Ballistic Missiles: Background and Issues for Congress , 2006 .

[10]  R. Norris,et al.  NUCLEAR INSECURITY A Critique of the Bush Administration's Nuclear Weapons Policies , 2004 .

[11]  Christopher Preble.  Joint Strike Fighter Can a Multiservice Fighter Program Succeed , 2002 .

[12]  Jonathan Medalia.  "Bunker Busters": Sources of Confusion in the Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator Debate , 2004 .

[13]  M. Quinlan.  The future of United Kingdom nuclear weapons: shaping the debate , 2006 .

[14]  Lawrence Freedman.  Deterrence: A reply , 2005 .

[15]  David S. Yost.  France's evolving nuclear strategy , 2005 .

[16]  Thomas E. Halverson.  The Last Great Nuclear Debate: NATO and Short-Range Nuclear Weapons in the 1980s , 1995 .

[17]  M. Clarke.  Does my bomb look big in this? Britain's nuclear choices after Trident , 2004 .

[18]  Brian G. Polser.  Theater Nuclear Weapons in Europe: The Contemporary Debate , 2004 .

[19]  Kurt M. Campbell,et al.  The Nuclear Tipping Point: Why States Reconsider Their Nuclear Choices , 2005 .

[20]  J. Deutch.  A Nuclear Posture for Today , 2005 .

[21]  Daryl G. Press,et al.  The Rise of U.S. Nuclear Primacy , 2006 .

[22]  David S. Yost.  The US and nuclear deterrence in Europe , 1999 .