The Long-Term Operating Performance of European Mergers and Acquisitions

We investigate the long-term profitability of corporate takeovers of which both the acquiring and target companies are from Continental Europe or the UK. We employ four different measures of operating performance that allow us to overcome a number of measurement limitations of the previous literature, which yielded inconsistent conclusions. Both acquiring and target companies significantly outperform the median peers in their industry prior to the takeovers, but the raw profitability of the combined firm decreases significantly following the takeover. However, this decrease becomes insignificant after we control for the performance of the peer companies which are chosen in order to control for industry, size and pre-event performance. None of the takeover characteristics (such as means of payment, geographical scope, and industry-relatedness) explain the post-acquisition operating performance. Still, we find an economically significant difference in the long-term performance of hostile versus friendly takeovers, and of tender offers versus negotiated deals: the performance deteriorates following hostile bids and tender offers. The acquirer's leverage prior takeover seems to have no impact on the post-merger performance of the combined firm, whereas the acquirer's cash holdings are negatively related to performance. This suggests that companies with excessive cash holdings suffer from free cash flow problems and are more likely to make poor acquisitions. Acquisitions of relatively large targets result in better profitability of the combined firm subsequent to the takeover, whereas acquisitions of a small target lead to a profitability decline.

[1]  L. Renneboog,et al.  Mergers and Acquisitions in Europe , 2006 .

[2]  R. Powell,et al.  Does Operating Performance Increase Post-takeover for UK Takeovers? A Comparison of Performance Measures and Benchmarks , 2005 .

[3]  Sara B. Moeller,et al.  Are Cross-Border Acquisitions Different from Domestic Acquisitions? Evidence on Stock and Operating Performance for U.S. Acquirers , 2006 .

[4]  M. Goergen,et al.  Project financed by the European Commission, DG Research , 2001 .

[5]  Y. Hoshino,et al.  Productivity and operating performance of Japanese merging firms: Keiretsu-related and independent mergers , 2002 .

[6]  Jonathan C. Ho,et al.  The Impact of Acquisitions on Operating Performance: Some Australian Evidence , 2002 .

[7]  Hun Y. Park,et al.  The Value of Corporate Diversification: Evidence from Post-Merger Performance in Japan , 2002 .

[8]  D. Mueller,et al.  The Effects of Mergers: An International Comparison , 2001 .

[9]  Aloke Ghosh,et al.  Does operating performance really improve following corporate acquisitions , 2001 .

[10]  Scott C. Linn,et al.  Are cash acquisitions associated with better postcombination operating performance than stock acquisitions , 2001 .

[11]  葉 聰明,et al.  Productivity and operating performance of Japanese merging firms : keiretsu-related and independent mergers , 2001 .

[12]  Prem C. Jain,et al.  Financial leverage changes associated with corporate mergers , 2000 .

[13]  Anil Shivdasani,et al.  The Effect of Bank Relations on Investment Decisions: An Investigation of Japanese Takeover Bids , 2000 .

[14]  Rashidah Abdul Rahman,et al.  Corporate Acquisitions and the Operating Performance of Malaysian Companies , 2000 .

[15]  Robert S. Harris,et al.  TAKEOVERS, MANAGEMENT REPLACEMENT, AND POST-ACQUISITION OPERATING PERFORMANCE: SOME EVIDENCE FROM THE 1980s , 1999 .

[16]  Aloke Ghosh,et al.  Managerial Ownership, the Method of Payment for Acquisitions, and Executive Job Retention , 1998 .

[17]  Anand M. Vijh,et al.  Do Long‐Term Shareholders Benefit From Corporate Acquisitions? , 1997 .

[18]  A. Dickerson,et al.  THE IMPACT OF ACQUISITIONS ON COMPANY PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM A LARGE PANEL OF UK FIRMS , 1997 .

[19]  Jarrad Harford,et al.  Corporate Cash Reserves and Acquisitions , 1997 .

[20]  Jeannette A. Switzer.  Evidence on real gains in corporate acquisitions , 1996 .

[21]  Brad M. Barber,et al.  Detecting abnormal operating performance: The empirical power and specification of test statistics , 1996 .

[22]  David J. Denis,et al.  Performance Changes Following Top Management Dismissals , 1995 .

[23]  D. Spiess,et al.  Underperformance in long-run stock returns following seasoned equity offerings , 1995 .

[24]  Kent Clark,et al.  Mergers as a Means of Restructuring Distressed Firms: An Empirical Investigation , 1994, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[25]  G. Mandelker,et al.  The Post-Merger Performance of Acquiring Firms: A Re-examination of an Anomaly , 1992 .

[26]  Marcia Millon Cornett,et al.  Medium of Payment in Corporate Acquisitions: Evidence from Interstate Bank Mergers , 1991 .

[27]  Richard S. Ruback,et al.  Does Corporate Performance Improve after Mergers? , 1990 .

[28]  Michael Bradley,et al.  Synergistic gains from corporate acquisitions and their division between the stockholders of target and acquiring firms , 1988 .

[29]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers , 1999 .

[30]  Ronald W. Masulis,et al.  Seasoned Equity Offerings: An Empirical Investigation , 1986 .

[31]  P. Asquith,et al.  Equity issues and offering dilution , 1986 .

[32]  Dennis C. Mueller,et al.  The Determinants and effects of mergers : an international comparison , 1980 .

[33]  G. Meeks,et al.  Disappointing Marriage: A Study of the Gains from Merger , 1977 .

[34]  B. Lev,et al.  The Microeconomic Consequences of Corporate Mergers , 1972 .

[35]  T. Hogarty.  The Profitability of Corporate Mergers , 1970 .