Budou posadky dlouhotrvajicich letu nachiyne ke skupinove jednomyslnosti? Vysledky simulacni studie : The risk for groupthink during long-duration space missions: Results from a 105 day confinement study

On a mission to Mars the crew will experience high autonomy and interdependence. “Groupthink,” known as a tendency to strive for consensus at the cost of considering alternative courses of action, represents a potential safety hazard. This chapter addresses two aspects of “groupthink”: the extent to which confined crew members perceive increasing convergence in personal values, and whether they attribute less tension to individual differences over time. It further examines the impact of personal values for interpersonal compatibility. These questions were investigated in a 105-day confinement study in which a multinational crew (N = 6) simulated a Mars mission. The Portrait of Crew Values Questionnaire was administered regularly to assess personal values, perceived value homogeneity, and tension attributed to value disparities. Interviews were conducted before and after the confinement. Multiple regression analysis revealed no significant changes in value homogeneity over time; rather the opposite tendency was indicated. More tension was attributed to differences in hedonism, benevolence and tradition in the last 35 days when the crew was allowed greater autonomy. Three subgroups, distinct in terms of personal values, were identified. No evidence for “groupthink” was found. The results suggest that personal values should be considered in composition of crews for long-duration missions.

[1]  I. Janis.  Victims Of Groupthink , 1972 .

[2]  N Kanas,et al.  Content analysis of the crew communication with external communicants under prolonged isolation. , 1997, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[3]  G M Sandal.  Crew Tension during a Space Station Simulation , 2001, Environment and behavior.

[4]  L A Palinkas,et al.  Sociocultural influences on psychosocial adjustment in Antarctica. , 1989, Medical anthropology.

[5]  A. Sarris.  Applying Organisational Theory to Isolated, Confined and Extreme Settings , 2008 .

[6]  C. Cassell,et al.  Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research , 2004 .

[7]  L. Palinkas,et al.  Seasonal variation of depressive symptoms in Antarctica , 1995, Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica.

[8]  G. Hofstede.  Culture′s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations , 2001 .

[9]  Gro M Sandal.  Culture and tension during an international space station simulation: results from SFINCSS '99. , 2004, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[10]  Catherine Cassell,et al.  Using Data Matrices , 2004 .

[11]  Leena M Tomi,et al.  The role of cross-cultural factors in long-duration international space missions: lessons from the SFINCSS-99 study. , 2002, Space technology.

[12]  G. R. Leon,et al.  Positive Experiences and Personal Growth in a Two-Man North Pole Expedition Team , 2011 .

[13]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications. , 1990 .

[14]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Extending the Cross-Cultural Validity of the Theory of Basic Human Values with a Different Method of Measurement , 2001 .

[15]  P. Suedfeld,et al.  The impact of outer space on inner space. , 2004, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[16]  Nick Kanas,et al.  Space Psychology and Psychiatry , 2003 .

[17]  A W Holland,et al.  Multicultural factors in the space environment: results of an international shuttle crew debrief. , 1993, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[18]  J. Edwards,et al.  Complementary and supplementary fit: a theoretical and empirical integration. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[19]  H Ursin,et al.  Interpersonal relations during simulated space missions. , 1995, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[20]  A D Kelly,et al.  Crewmember communication in space: a survey of astronauts and cosmonauts. , 1992, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[21]  P. Suedfeld.  Space memoirs: Value hierarchies before and after missions—A pilot study , 2006 .

[22]  A. Kristof-brown,et al.  CONSEQUENCES OF INDIVIDUALS' FIT AT WORK: A META-ANALYSIS OF PERSON-JOB, PERSON-ORGANIZATION, PERSON-GROUP, AND PERSON-SUPERVISOR FIT , 2005 .

[23]  Bryan Burrough,et al.  Dragonfly: NASA and the Crisis Aboard Mir , 1999 .

[24]  S. Schwartz.  A Theory Of Cultural Value Orientations: Explication And Applications , 2006 .

[25]  Fons J. R. van de Vijver,et al.  Personal values and crew compatibility: Results from a 105 days simulated space mission , 2011 .

[26]  Nick Kanas,et al.  High versus low crewmember autonomy in space simulation environments , 2010 .

[27]  Beth G. Chung-Herrera,et al.  Diversity in organizations: Where are we now and where are we going? , 2009 .

[28]  Danny J. Johnson,et al.  The Use of Person-Group Fit for Employment Selection: A Missing Link in Person-Environment Fit , 2001 .

[29]  N Kanas,et al.  Crewmember interactions during a Mir space station simulation. , 1996, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.