In vivo micro-computed tomography allows direct three-dimensional quantification of both bone formation and bone resorption parameters using time-lapsed imaging.

[1]  R. Müller,et al.  Mechanical loading of mouse caudal vertebrae increases trabecular and cortical bone mass-dependence on dose and genotype , 2010, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[2]  J. Jurvelin,et al.  Metabolic status of human trabecular bone affects reproducibility and agreement of microCT and histomorphometry , 2009 .

[3]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Effects of PTH treatment on tibial bone of ovariectomized rats assessed by in vivo micro-CT , 2009, Osteoporosis International.

[4]  G. H. van Lenthe,et al.  Non-invasive bone competence analysis by high-resolution pQCT: an in vitro reproducibility study on structural and mechanical properties at the human radius. , 2009, Bone.

[5]  Ralph Müller,et al.  A novel in vivo mouse model for mechanically stimulated bone adaptation – a combined experimental and computational validation study , 2008, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[6]  V. Jorgetti,et al.  Accentuated osteoclastic response to parathyroid hormone undermines bone mass acquisition in osteonectin-null mice. , 2008, Bone.

[7]  Timothy M Wright,et al.  Bone Mass Is Preserved and Cancellous Architecture Altered Due to Cyclic Loading of the Mouse Tibia After Orchidectomy , 2008, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[8]  Ralph Müller,et al.  Automated compartmental analysis for high-throughput skeletal phenotyping in femora of genetic mouse models. , 2007, Bone.

[9]  K. Ishihara,et al.  Gab2 plays distinct roles in bone homeostasis at different time points , 2007, Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism.

[10]  R. Lindsay,et al.  Effects of cyclic vs. daily treatment with human parathyroid hormone (1-34) on murine bone structure and cellular activity. , 2007, Bone.

[11]  Ralph Müller,et al.  Evaluation of Three-dimensional Image Registration Methodologies for In Vivo Micro-computed Tomography , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  R. Müller,et al.  Compartmental Bone Morphometry in the Mouse Femur: Reproducibility and Resolution Dependence of Microtomographic Measurements , 2005, Calcified Tissue International.

[13]  Laurence Vico,et al.  Noninvasive In Vivo Monitoring of Bone Architecture Alterations in Hindlimb‐Unloaded Female Rats Using Novel Three‐Dimensional Microcomputed Tomography , 2003, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[14]  R. Lindsay,et al.  Anabolic action of parathyroid hormone on cortical and cancellous bone differs between axial and appendicular skeletal sites in mice. , 2003, Bone.

[15]  L. Donahue,et al.  Regulation of bone volume is different in the metaphyses of the femur and vertebra of C3H/HeJ and C57BL/6J mice. , 2002, Bone.

[16]  M. Unser,et al.  Interpolation revisited [medical images application] , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[17]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  Direct Three‐Dimensional Morphometric Analysis of Human Cancellous Bone: Microstructural Data from Spine, Femur, Iliac Crest, and Calcaneus , 1999, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[18]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  Morphometric analysis of human bone biopsies: a quantitative structural comparison of histological sections and micro-computed tomography. , 1998, Bone.

[19]  H. Takahashi,et al.  A Morphometric Comparison of Trabecular Structure of Human Ilium Between Microcomputed Tomography and Conventional Histomorphometry , 1997, Calcified Tissue International.

[20]  P. Delmas,et al.  Automatic-interactive measurement of resorption cavities in transiliac bone biopsies and correlation with deoxypyridinoline. , 1995, Bone.

[21]  J. Compston,et al.  Combined inter-observer and inter-method variation in bone histomorphometry. , 1992, Bone.

[22]  E. Bonucci,et al.  Technical variability of bone histomorphometric measurements. , 1990, Bone and mineral.

[23]  H. Frost.  Skeletal structural adaptations to mechanical usage (SATMU): 2. Redefining Wolff's Law: The remodeling problem , 1990, The Anatomical record.

[24]  M. Drezner,et al.  Bone histomorphometry: Standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units: Report of the asbmr histomorphometry nomenclature committee , 1987, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[25]  J. Compston,et al.  Inter-observer and intra-observer variation in bone histomorphometry , 1986, Calcified Tissue International.

[26]  C. Minkin.  Bone acid phosphatase: Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase as a marker of osteoclast function , 1982, Calcified Tissue International.

[27]  Steven K Boyd,et al.  Reproducibility of bone micro-architecture measurements in rodents by in vivo micro-computed tomography is maximized with three-dimensional image registration. , 2010, Bone.

[28]  M. Jergas,et al.  Accurate assessment of precision errors: How to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[29]  R. Midura,et al.  In vivo longitudinal assessment of bone resorption in a fibular osteotomy model using micro-computed tomography. , 2005, The Iowa orthopaedic journal.

[30]  H Weinans,et al.  Detecting and tracking local changes in the tibiae of individual rats: a novel method to analyse longitudinal in vivo micro-CT data. , 2004, Bone.

[31]  Michael Unser,et al.  A pyramid approach to subpixel registration based on intensity , 1998, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[32]  J. Birkenhäger,et al.  Bone appositional rate and percentage of doubly and singly labeled surfaces: comparison of data from 5 and 20 microns sections. , 1987, Bone.