Capacity Analysis of Lattice Reduction Aided Equalizers for Massive MIMO Systems

Massive multi-input-multi-output (MIMO) systems are the future of the communication system. The proper design of the MIMO system needs an appropriate choice of detection algorithms. At the same time, Lattice reduction (LR)-aided equalizers have been well investigated for MIMO systems. Many studies have been carried out over the Korkine–Zolotareff (KZ) and Lenstra–Lenstra–Lovasz (LLL) algorithms. This paper presents an analysis of the channel capacity of the massive MIMO system. The mathematical calculations included in this paper correspond to the channel correlation effect on the channel capacity. Besides, the achievable gain over the linear receiver is also highlighted. In this study, all the calculations were further verified through the simulated results. The simulated results show the performance comparison between zero forcing (ZF), minimum mean squared error (MMSE), integer forcing (IF) receivers with log-likelihood ratio (LLR)-ZF, LLR-MMSE, KZ-ZF, and KZ-MMSE. The main objective of this work is to show that, when a lattice reduction algorithm is combined with the convention linear MIMO receiver, it improves the capacity tremendously. The same is proven here, as the KZ-MMSE receiver outperforms its counterparts in a significant margin.

[1]  Keith Holt,et al.  A Lattice-Reduction-Aided Soft Demapper for High-Rate Coded MIMO-OFDM Systems , 2007, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[2]  László Lovász,et al.  Factoring polynomials with rational coefficients , 1982 .

[3]  Taufik Abrão,et al.  Efficient Lattice Reduction Aided Detectors Under Realistic MIMO Channels , 2016, Wireless Personal Communications.

[4]  Samarendra Nath Sur,et al.  Capacity Analysis of MIMO in Non-Uniform Nakagami Channel with Linear Receiver , 2017 .

[5]  Jaeseok Kim,et al.  Low-complexity lattice reduction algorithm for MIMO detectors with tree searching , 2017, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[6]  Mohammed El-Hajjar,et al.  Hardware Efficient Architecture for Element-Based Lattice Reduction Aided K-Best Detector for MIMO Systems , 2018, J. Sens. Actuator Networks.

[7]  Michail Matthaiou,et al.  On the Sum Rate of MIMO Nakagami-m Fading Channels with Linear Receivers , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[8]  Xiaoli Ma,et al.  Lattice-reduction aided equalization for OFDM systems , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[9]  John M. Cioffi,et al.  On the distribution of SINR for the MMSE MIMO receiver and performance analysis , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[10]  Jianping Li,et al.  A novel hybrid fix‐LLL lattice reduction algorithm for MIMO detection system , 2017 .

[11]  Jun Tong,et al.  On the Energy Efficiency of Massive MIMO Systems With Low-Resolution ADCs and Lattice Reduction Aided Detectors , 2020, Symmetry.

[12]  Cong Ling,et al.  On the Proximity Factors of Lattice Reduction-Aided Decoding , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[13]  Cong Ling,et al.  Boosted KZ and LLL Algorithms , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[14]  S. Malarvizhi,et al.  Lattice reduction aided pre-processor for large scale MIMO detection , 2019, Microprocess. Microsystems.

[15]  John S. Thompson,et al.  Fixing the Complexity of the Sphere Decoder for MIMO Detection , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[16]  Tiejun Lv,et al.  Semidefinite Programming Relaxation Based Virtually Antipodal Detection for MIMO Systems Using Gray-Coded High-Order QAM , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[17]  Xiaoli Ma,et al.  Element-Based Lattice Reduction Algorithms for Large MIMO Detection , 2013, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[18]  Lajos Hanzo,et al.  Fifty Years of MIMO Detection: The Road to Large-Scale MIMOs , 2015, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[19]  Erik G. Larsson,et al.  Scaling Up MIMO: Opportunities and Challenges with Very Large Arrays , 2012, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[20]  Alexander Vardy,et al.  Closest point search in lattices , 2002, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[21]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Probability of error in MMSE multiuser detection , 1997, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[22]  M. Guenach,et al.  Novel Lattice Reduction Algorithms: Precoder Reduction and Vector Perturbation Tradeoffs , 2018, IEEE Communications Letters.

[23]  Shikai Qiu,et al.  Efficient MIMO Preprocessor With Sorting-Relaxed QR Decomposition and Modified Greedy LLL Algorithm , 2020, IEEE Access.

[24]  Sidan Du,et al.  Complex Korkine-Zolotareff Reduction Algorithm for Full-Diversity MIMO Detection , 2013, IEEE Communications Letters.

[25]  Hyundong Shin,et al.  On the error probability of binary and M-ary signals in Nakagami-m fading channels , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[26]  Erik G. Larsson,et al.  Energy and Spectral Efficiency of Very Large Multiuser MIMO Systems , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[27]  Wai Ho Mow,et al.  Complex Lattice Reduction Algorithm for Low-Complexity Full-Diversity MIMO Detection , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[28]  Michael Gastpar,et al.  Integer-Forcing Linear Receivers , 2014, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[29]  M. Seysen,et al.  Simultaneous reduction of a lattice basis and its reciprocal basis , 1993, Comb..

[30]  Xiao-Wen Chang,et al.  On the KZ Reduction , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[31]  Jaeseok Kim,et al.  Near-ML MIMO Detection Algorithm With LR-Aided Fixed-Complexity Tree Searching , 2014, IEEE Communications Letters.